Wahdat-al-Khayāl (Unity of Thought): A Psychologist’s Response to Wahdat-al-Wujūd (Unity of Being) and Wahdat-alShuhūd (Unity of Witnessing)

Authors

  • Waqar Husain *

    Department of Humanities, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad Campus, Park Road, Islamabad 45550, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55121/prr.v2i1.511

Keywords:

Thought, Infinite Consciousness, Metaphysics, Metaphysical Monism, Philosophy of Self, Reality, Mysticism, Spirituality

Abstract

The quest to comprehend the nature of reality and the essence of selfhood has long animated metaphysical inquiry across civilizations. The current discourse presents the concept of Wahdat-al-Khayāl (Unity of Thought) as the foundational ontology. By critically engaging with classical metaphysical frameworks of Wahdat-al-Wujūd (Unity of Being) and Wahdat-al-Shuhūd (Unity of Witnessing), this work has argued that neither existence nor observation alone can adequately account for the ultimate nature of reality. Instead, thought, as the dynamic cognitive activity of Infinite Consciousness, underlies and constitutes all that appears within the cosmos. Crucially, the present philosophy challenges prevailing dualisms between subject and object, mind and matter, and being and witnessing. It posits that the apparent material universe and multiplicity of selves are not independent realities but emanations of thought, emphasizing the inseparability and supremacy of Khayāl —thought—as the ultimate ground of all existence. This perspective not only advances metaphysical understanding but also offers profound implications for psychosocial health, suggesting that wellness emerges through the reorientation from fragmented selfhood to authentic unity with infinite consciousness. By grounding reality in thought, the Wahdat-al-Khayāl framework integrates ancient wisdom with contemporary insights, offering a novel path for philosophical inquiry and psychological practice. It invites scholars and clinicians to reconsider the nature of self, consciousness, and existence, advocating for approaches that facilitate transcendence, coherence, and holistic wellness. Ultimately, this philosophy affirms that the deepest truth of our being is unity—an indivisible oneness of thought—beyond all illusion of separation and multiplicity.

References

[1] Kiria, A., 2022. Damaskios’ Triadic Theory of the One in View of its Divergence from the Principle Theories of Iamblichus and Proclus [in German]. Phasis. 25, 4–48.

[2] Khlebnikov, G., Abyzova, L., 2018. Picture of Universum in Neoplatonism: God – Faith – Person – World. Bulletin of the DSU. Series: Socio-philosophical problems of human and social development [in Ukrainian]. 9, 18–26.

[3] Armstrong, A.H., 1967. The Architecture of the Intelligible Universe in the Philosophy of Plotinus: An Analytical and Historical Study. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–128.

[4] Elkaisy-Friemuth, M., Dillon, J.M., 2009. The Afterlife of the Platonic Soul: Reflections of Platonic Psychology in the Monotheistic Religions. Ancient Mediterranean and Medieval Texts and Contexts. Brill: Leiden, Boston. pp. 1–236.

[5] Bussanich, J., 1996. Plotinus’s Metaphysics of the One. In: Gerson, L.P. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 38–65.

[6] Bertozzi, A., 2021. Plotinus on Love: An Introduction to His Metaphysics Through the Concept of Eros. Brill: Leiden, Boston.

[7] Guthrie, K.S., 1990. An English Index to the Enneads of Plotinus. Chthonios Books: Hastings, England.

[8] Kalligas, P., Fowden, E.K., Pilavachi, N., 2014. The Enneads of Plotinus: A Commentary. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA.

[9] O’Meara, D.J., 1993. Plotinus: An introduction to the Enneads. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[10] Daniel, S.H., 2007. Reexamining Berkeley’s Philosophy. University of Toronto Press: Toronto, Canada.

[11] Dicker, G., 2011. Berkeley's Idealism: A Critical Examination. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA.

[12] Jacquette, D., 1985. Berkeley’s continuity argument for the existence of God. The Journal of Religion. 65(1), 1–14.

[13] Kail, P.J.E., 2014. Berkeley's A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge: An introduction. Cambridge Introductions to Key Philosophical Texts. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA.

[14] Berkeley, G., 1971. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, 1734. Scolar Press: England, UK.

[15] Berkeley, G., 2006. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Barnes & Noble Publishing, Inc.: New York, NY, USA.

[16] Tipton, I.C., 1988. Berkeley—The Philosophy of Immaterialism. Garland Publishing, Inc.: New York, NY, USA.

[17] Roche, A.F., 2018. Kant’s transcendental deduction and the unity of space and time. Kantian Review. 23(1), 41–64.

[18] Bitbol, M., 2010. Reflective metaphysics: Understanding quantum mechanics from a Kantian standpoint. Philosophica. 83(1), 53–83.

[19] Guyer, P., 2010. The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press: England, UK.

[20] Goy, I., 2023. Kant on Proofs for God's Existence. De Gruyter: Berlin; Boston.

[21] Norman, J., Welchman, A., 2023. Schopenhauer’s The World as Will and Representation: A Critical Guide. Cambridge Critical Guides. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA.

[22] Segala, M., 2024. A Convex Mirror: Schopenhauer's Philosophy and the Sciences. Oxford University PressNew York: NY, USA.

[23] Wicks, R., 2011. Schopenhauer’s The World as Will and Representation: A Reader’s Guide. Continuum International Publishing Group: London, UK.

[24] Norman, J., Welchman, A., Janaway, C., 2010. The World as Will and Representation. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Schopenhauer. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA.

[25] Pippin, R.B., 2012. Introductions to Nietzsche. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA.

[26] Metzger, J.A., 2009. Nietzsche, Nihilism and the Philosophy of the Future. Continuum International Publishing Group: London, UK.

[27] May, S., 2011. Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morality: A Critical Guide. Cambridge Critical Guides. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA.

[28] Nietzsche, F.W., Ansell-Pearson, K., Diethe, C., 2007. On the Genealogy of Morality. Rev. student ed. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA.

[29] Welshon, R., 2024. Friedrich Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morality: A Guide. Oxford Guides to Philosophy. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA.

[30] Mach, E., 1890. The analysis of the sensations. The Monist, A Quarterly Magazine Devoted to the Philosophy of Science (1890–1905). 1(1), 48.

[31] Mach, E., 1914. The Analysis of Sensations, and the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical. Open Court Publishing Company: Chicago, IL, USA.

[32] Husserl, E., 1989. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: Second book studies in the phenomenology of constitution. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, Netherlands.

[33] Merleau-Ponty, M., Landes, D.A. (trans.), 2013. Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge: New York, NY, USA.

[34] Hidayat, Y.F., 2025. The Concept of Wahdat al-Wujud Ibn 'Arabi's Thought and its Relevance in Sufism. Journal of Noesantara Islamic Studies. 1(6), 325–334.

[35] Fakih, Z.K., 1998. Ibn Arabi and the Understanding of Wahdat al-Wujud [in German]. Reflection [in German]. 1(1), 55–66.

[36] Abrahamov, B., 2015. Ibn Al-Arabi's Fusus Al-Hikam: An Annotated Translation of "The Bezels of Wisdom". Routledge: London, UK.

[37] Firdaus, M.A., Sahib, R., 2021. Wahdat Al-Syuhud: Ahmad Sirhindi's criticism on the concept of Wahdat Al-Wujud Ibn 'Arabi. Millati: Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities. 6(2), 209–224.

[38] Cheifetz, H., 2023. Al-Shaʿrānī’s defence of Ibn ʿArabī in Context: interpreting ‘the oneness of existence’ (waḥdat al-wujūd) as experiential oneness. Journal of Sufi Studies. 12(2), 182–215.

[39] Mohrhoff, U., 2014. Manifesting the quantum world. Foundations of Physics. 44(6), 641–677.

[40] Greenstein, G., Zajonc, A., 1997. The quantum challenge: Modern research on the foundations of quantum mechanics. Jones & Bartlett Learning: Sudbury, MA, USA.

[41] Weissmann, G., Larson, C.S., 2017. The quantum paradigm and challenging the objectivity assumption. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy. 13(2), 281–297.

[42] Wallace, D., 2016. Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. In: Rickles, D. (ed.). The Ashgate Companion to Contemporary Philosophy of Physics. Routledge: Oxford, UK. pp. 22–104.

[43] Calosi, C., Wilson, J., 2018. Quantum metaphysical indeterminacy. Philosophical Studies. 176(10), 2599–2627.

[44] Zambianco, M.H., Landulfo, A.G.S., Matsas, G.E.A., 2019. Observer dependence of entanglement in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. Physical Review A. 100(6), 062126.

[45] Shimony, A., 1963. Role of the observer in quantum theory. American Journal of Physics. 31(10), 755–773.

[46] Cunningham, P.F., 2024. The real 'hard problem' of consciousness: where do thoughts come from, if not the brain? Journal of Consciousness Studies. 31(7), 28–54.

[47] Wahbeh, H., Radin, D., Sagher, U., et al., 2022. What if consciousness is not an emergent property of the brain? Observational and empirical challenges to materialistic models. Frontiers in Psychology. 13, 955594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.955594

[48] Meese, T.S., 2018. The how and why of consciousness? Frontiers in Psychology. 9, 02173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02173

[49] Bostrom, N., 2003. Are we living in a computer simulation? The Philosophical Quarterly. 53(211), 243–255.

[50] Wheeler, J.A., 1990. Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links. In: Zurek, W.H. (ed.). Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, USA. pp. 3–28.

[51] Strawson, G., 2008. Realistic Monism: Why Physicalism Entails Panpsychism. In: Real Materialism. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA. pp. 53–74.

[52] Goff, P., 2017. Consciousness and Fundamental Reality. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA.

[53] Whitehead, A.N., 2010. Process and Reality. Simon and Schuster: New York, NY, USA.

[54] Griffin, D.R., 2008. Unsnarling the World-Knot: Consciousness, Freedom, and the Mind-Body Problem. Wipf and Stock Publishers: Eugene, OR, USA.

[55] Georgetown University, Steinhardt, J., Coale, A.J., 1966. Science and the Modern world. Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA.

[56] Gödel, K., 1931. On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems I [in German]. Monthly Journal of Mathematics and Physics [in German]. 38(1), 173–198.

[57] Penrose, R., 2016. The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[58] Penrose, R., 1994. Shadows of the Mind, vol. 4. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[59] Dutta, R., Sarmah, C., 2024. Shankaracharya’s outlooks on impermanence nature of life and world and the significance of its spiritual values on the light of his famous verse “Brahman satya jagat mithya”. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts. 5(6), 2727–2731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i6.2024.3326

[60] Bhanu, U., 2024. Interpretations of the Self in Hindu Philosophy: Advaita vs. Dvaita. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research. 6(5), 1–10.

[61] Roy, D.K.S., 2022. Advaita epistemology and metaphysics – a critical analysis. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research. 5(3), 2727–2731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i3-29

[62] Burmistrov, S.L., 2022. The problem of ontological independence in Mahāyāna Buddhist philosophy. Written monuments of the East [in Russian]. 19(1), 19–32.

[63] Stepien, R.K., 2021. Substantialism, essentialism, emptiness: Buddhist critiques of ontology. Journal of Indian Philosophy. 49(5), 871–893.

[64] Singh, N.G.K., 2019. Guru Nanak’s sensuous metaphysics. Sikh Formations. 15(1–2), 200–211.

[65] Mandair, A.P.S., 2024. Diasporic impulses: Sikh philosophy as an assemblage. Philosophy East and West. 74(2), 364–378.

[66] Zhirtueva, N.S., 2021. The material and the ideal in the context of typology of the world’s mystical doctrines. Bulletin of Slavic Cultures [in Russian]. 61, 104–114.

[67] Karuvelil, G., 2025. Person-mysticism: the heart of Christian spirituality. Theology Today. 81(4), 346–362.

[68] Spencer, D., 2021. The challenge of mysticism: a primer from a Christian perspective. Sophia. 60(4), 1027–1045.

[69] Otten, W., 2016. Christianity’s content: (Neo)platonism in the middle ages, its theoretical and theological appeal. Numen. 63(2–3), 245–270.

[70] Lebens, S., 2020. Idealism ex Nihilo. In: The Principles of Judaism. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. pp. 70–92.

[71] Huss, B., 2021. “For the letter kills, but the spirit gives life”: Halakha versus Kabbalah in the study of Jewish mysticism. Modern Judaism – A Journal of Jewish Ideas and Experience. 41(1), 47–70.

[72] Inge, W.R., 2009. Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism. Philosophy. 23(85), 188–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S003181910000629X

[73] Husain, W., 2022. It’s time to translate the Quranic words Nafs & Qalb as referring to mind & intelligence. Islamiyyat. 44(2), 77–95.

[74] Husain, W., 2024. The Quranic perspective on psychopathology and psychotherapy: a comprehensive guide for psychotherapists of Islamic world. International Journal of Islamic Psychology. 7, 29–57.

[75] Husain, W., 2021. Components of psychosocial health. Health Education. 122(4), 387–401.

[76] Husain, W., Zainal, K., Shahril, M.I., et al., 2024. Simplifying the understanding and measurement of mental disorders through a comprehensive framework of psychosocial health. OBM Integrative and Complementary Medicine. 9(1), 1–30.

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (June 2025)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Waqar Husain

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.