Abstract

This philosophical article examines the ontological assumptions underlying exclusionary claims of cultural preservation and racialised belonging. Contemporary debates on cultural identity frequently oscillate between pluralist recognition and defensive forms of exclusion, yet they rarely interrogate the conception of culture that renders such exclusion intelligible in the first place. To address this problem, the article introduces the concept of cultural extensibility in order to challenge the view that cultures exist as closed, self-identical, or self-sufficient entities. Drawing on hermeneutic phenomenology, relational ontology, postcolonial thought, critical phenomenology, and philosophy of race, the article argues that cultural identity develops through historically mediated and relationally constituted processes rather than through fixed cultural essences or insulated traditions. From this perspective, exclusionary identity claims rely upon a substantialist understanding of culture that denies the relational conditions through which cultural continuity becomes possible. The discussion further examines phenomenologically how racialised exclusion attempts to stabilise identity by restricting relational openness through affective orientation, perceptual fixation, epistemic closure, and defensive forms of cultural self-preservation. This process is described as a form of ontological contraction in which relational co-presence is reinterpreted as threat or intrusion rather than as a constitutive condition of cultural existence. The article concludes that anti-Black exclusion is not only ethically unjustifiable but also ontologically incoherent, and it proposes an ethics of cohabitation grounded in the historically mediated and relational structure of cultural being itself.

Keywords

Cultural ExtensibilityRelational OntologyCritical PhenomenologyPhilosophy of RaceRacialised ExclusionRelational Identity

References

  1. [1] Appadurai, A., 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  2. [2] Gilroy, P., 2004. After Empire: Melancholia or Convivial Culture? Routledge: London, UK.
  3. [3] Vertovec, S., 2019. Talking around super-diversity. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 42(1), 125–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1406128
  4. [4] Hegel, G.W.F., 1979. Phenomenology of Spirit. Miller, A.V. (Trans.). Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
  5. [5] Al-Saji, A., 2019. Glued to the image: A critical phenomenology of racialization through works of art. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 77(4), 475–488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12680
  6. [6] Ngo, H., 2022. Critical phenomenology and the banality of white supremacy. Philosophy Compass. 17(1), e12796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12796
  7. [7] Weiss, G., Murphy, A.V., Salamon, G. (Eds.), 2019. 50 Concepts for a Critical Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press: Evanston, IL, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvmx3j22
  8. [8] Mills, C.W., 2007. White ignorance. In: Sullivan, S., Tuana, N. (Eds.). Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance. State University of New York Press: Albany, NY, USA. pp. 11–38.
  9. [9] Fricker, M., 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
  10. [10] Dotson, K., 2014. Conceptualizing epistemic oppression. Social Epistemology. 28(2), 115–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.782585
  11. [11] Medina, J., 2013. The Epistemology of Resistance. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
  12. [12] Gadamer, H.G., 2004. Truth and Method, 2nd ed. Continuum: London, UK.
  13. [13] Glissant, É., 1997. Poetics of Relation. Wing, B. (Trans.). University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.10257
  14. [14] Bhabha, H.K., 1994. The Location of Culture, 2nd ed. Routledge: London, UK.
  15. [15] Britton, C., 1999. Édouard Glissant and Postcolonial Theory: Strategies of Language and Resistance. University of Virginia Press: Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  16. [16] Dash, J.M., 1998. The Other America: Caribbean Literature in a New World Context. University Press of Virginia: Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  17. [17] Lionnet, F., Shih, S.-M. (Eds.), 2005. Minor Transnationalism. Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386643
  18. [18] Gordon, J.A., 2014. Creolizing Political Theory: Reading Rousseau through Fanon. Fordham University Press: New York, NY, USA.
  19. [19] Shannon, D.B., Hackett, A., 2024. Opaque reciprocity: Or theorising Glissant’s ‘right to opacity’ as a communication and language praxis in early childhood education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. 45(1), 118–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2023.2273336
  20. [20] Kopf, M., 2025. The End of "New World Literature": Migration and Creolization in Maryse Condé's Traversée de la mangrove and V.S. Naipaul's A House for Mr. Biswas. Journal of World Literature. 10(1), 86–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/24056480-01001005
  21. [21] Jeyasingh, T.E., 2025. Édouard Glissant and the importance of reading well: Opacitic-reading as geographic method. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 50(2), e12685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12685
  22. [22] Fanon, F., 2008. Black Skin, White Masks. Grove Press: New York, NY, USA.
  23. [23] Ahmed, S., 2006. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388074
  24. [24] Derrida, J., Dufourmantelle, A., 2000. Of Hospitality. Bowlby, R. (Trans.). Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA, USA.
  25. [25] Levinas, E., 1969. Totality and Infinity. Duquesne University Press: Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  26. [26] Agamben, G., 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Heller-Roazen, D. (Trans.). Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA, USA.
  27. [27] Gündoğdu, A., 2015. Rightlessness in an Age of Rights. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199370412.001.0001
  28. [28] Ziarek, E.P., 2013. Feminist reflections on vulnerability: Disrespect, obligation, action. SubStance. 42(3), 67–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2013.0036
  29. [29] Zehfuss, M., Vaughan-Williams, N., 2024. From security-space to time-race: Reimagining borders and migration in global politics. International Political Sociology. 18(3), olae019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olae019
  30. [30] Achiume, E.T., 2022. Racial borders. The Georgetown Law Journal. 110(3), 445–508.
  31. [31] Da Lomba, S., Vermeylen, S., 2023. Rethinking vulnerability as a radically ethical device: Ethical vulnerability analysis and the EU's "migration crisis". Human Rights Review. 24(2), 263–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-023-00685-5
  32. [32] Martín, A., 2021. What is white ignorance? The Philosophical Quarterly. 71(4), pqaa073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqaa073
  33. [33] Teo, T., 2022. What is a white epistemology in psychological science? A critical race-theoretical analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 13, 861584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.861584
  34. [34] Nikolaidis, A.C., 2023. Structural white ignorance and education for racial justice. Theory and Research in Education. 21(1), 52–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14778785231162106
  35. [35] Habgood-Coote, J., 2024. Search engines, white ignorance, and the social epistemology of technology. Philosophy. 99(3), 479–510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S003181912400007X
  36. [36] Santos, B.d.S., 2018. The End of the Cognitive Empire. Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA.
  37. [37] Alcoff, L.M., 2015. The Future of Whiteness. Polity Press: Cambridge, UK.
  38. [38] De Santis, D., Hopkins, B.C., Majolino, C. (Eds.), 2020. The Routledge Handbook of Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy. Routledge: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003084013
  39. [39] Ricoeur, P., 1992. Oneself as Another. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA.
  40. [40] Nancy, J.-L., 2000. Being Singular Plural. Stanford University Press: Redwood City, CA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503619005
  41. [41] Bongie, C., 1998. Islands and Exiles: The Creole Identities of Post/Colonial Literature. Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA, USA.
  42. [42] Hallward, P., 2001. Absolutely Postcolonial: Writing between the Singular and the Specific. Manchester University Press: Manchester, UK.
  43. [43] Panaïté, O., 2021. Relating the Universal, Universalizing the Relation: The Glissant-Derrida Ch(i)asm(us). MLN. 136(4), S-134–S-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/mln.2021.0072
  44. [44] Benhabib, S., 2004. The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents, and Citizens. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790799
  45. [45] Massumi, B., 2002. Parables for the Virtual. Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822383574
  46. [46] Lacan, J., 1977. Écrits: A Selection. Sheridan, A. (Trans.). W. W. Norton: New York, NY, USA.
  47. [47] Antich, P.A., 2023. Mitigating tensions between phenomenology and critique. Puncta: Journal of Critical Phenomenology. 6(2), 6–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61372/PJCP.v6i2.2
  48. [48] Gündoğdu, A., 2026. A Critical Phenomenology of Racialized Vulnerability: Judith Butler and the Rodney King Trial. American Political Science Review. 120(2), 477–489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055425100932
  49. [49] Kakoliris, G., 2024. Jacques Derrida on the Aporias of Hospitality. Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57966-0
  50. [50] Gilroy, P., 2002. Against Race: Imagining Political Culture beyond the Color Line. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
  51. [51] Bhambra, G.K., 2014. Connected Sociologies. Bloomsbury Academic: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472544377
  52. [52] Mbembe, A., 2017. Critique of Black Reason. Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373230
  53. [53] Balibar, É., 2014. Equaliberty: Political Essays. Ingram, J. (Trans.). Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA.
  54. [54] Modood, T., 2017. Must Interculturalists misrepresent multiculturalism? Comparative Migration Studies. 5, 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-017-0058-y

How to Cite

Viateur Nkurunziza. Cultural Extensibility and the Ethics of Cohabitation: Exclusionary Identity, Anti-Blackness, and the Ontology of Culture. Philosophy and Realistic Reflection. 29 June 2026. https://doi.org/10.55121/prr.v3i2.102510
Citation formats

Copyright & License

Copyright © 2026 Viateur Nkurunziza. Published by Japan Bilingual Publishing Co..

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Article Metrics

335Abstract views
193Downloads