Open Access Article

Assessment of the Applicability of Green Building Rating System in Mitigating Impacts of Building Projects

Authors

  • Akeem Bolaji Wahab

    Department of Building, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife 220282, Nigeria
  • Fola Oluwatimilehin Olaoye

    Healthy and Sustainable Buildings, Deggendorf Institute of Technology, European Campus Rottal-Inn, 94469 Pfarrkirchen, Germany
  • Samuel Oludare Omojola

    Department of Building, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife 220282, Nigeria
  • Nwora Valentine Ngwoke

    Department of Building, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife 220282, Nigeria
  • Peter Oluwapelumi Ipadeola

    Department of Architecture, Building and Quantity Surveying, Abiola Ajimobi Technical University, Ibadan 200255, Nigeria
  • Bidemi Funmilola Olukoya Olukoya

    Department of Architecture, Building and Quantity Surveying, Abiola Ajimobi Technical University, Ibadan 200255, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55121/upc.v4i1.1130
Received: 10 February 2026 | Revised: 19 April 2026 | Accepted: 26 April 2026 | Published Online: 3 May 2026

Abstract

The study examined Green Building Rating System (GBRS) in use for building projects in Lagos State, Nigeria. The data for the study were collected from primary and secondary sources on the strengths and weaknesses, criteria of assessment, and the required criteria for enhancing their applicability to the Nigerian local context from the identified twelve (12) certified green building projects. Out of eighteen (18) green building experts identified in the study area, thirteen (13) participated in the study. The data obtained were analysed using thematic analysis, priority ranking and fraction method. The results showed that the most prevalent GBRS in use in the study area were Excellence in Design for Greater Efficiencies (EDGE) and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). Limitation in the adoption of the EDGE and LEED was their lack of functionality in the social aspects of sustainability in buildings. The study developed a weighting framework and flowchart representation of the criteria to be considered by the green building experts to enhance applicability of the rating systems. The study concluded that the EDGE and LEED adopted in the study area focused exclusively on the environmental aspects of sustainability that would mitigate impacts of buildings but they should be adapted to include social and economic aspects of sustainability so as to improve their usage in assessing and certifying buildings while the Nigerian government should equally make efforts to develop her own home-grown green building rating system so as to deepen applicability of GBRS in the country.

Keywords

EDGE, LEED, GBRS, Nigeria

References

[1] Firoozi, A.A., Firoozi, A.A., Oyejobi, D.O., et al., 2024. Emerging Trends in Sustainable Building Materials: Technological Innovations, Enhanced Performance, and Future Directions. Results in Engineering. 24, 103521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103521

[2] Darko, A., Chan, A.P., Owusu, E.K., et al., 2018. Benefits of Green Building: A Literature Review. In Proceedings of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) COBRA 2018, London, UK, 23–24 April 2018.

[3] Kriss, J., 2014. What Is Green Building? Available from: https://www.usgbc.org/articles/what-green-building (cited 10 May 2025).

[4] Olabi, A.G., Shehata, N., Issa, U.H., et al., 2024. The Role of Green Buildings in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. International Journal of Thermofluids. 25, 101002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2024.101002

[5] Ola, O.S., Adjekophori, B., 2018. Adoption of Green Building Practice in Commercial Properties in Lagos, Nigeria. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research. 8(6), 182–191.

[6] Babarinde, S.A., Olanrewaju, O.I., Oyefusi, O.N., et al., 2019. Critical Review of Factors Inhibiting the Adoption of Green Building Design in Nigeria. PM World Journal. 8(7), 1–13.

[7] Marchi, L., Antonini, E., Politi, S., et al., 2021. Green Building Rating Systems (GBRSs). Encyclopedia. 1(4), 998–1009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia1040076

[8] Tang, K.H.D., Foo, C.Y.H., Tan, I.S., et al., 2020. A Review of the Green Building Rating Systems. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 943, 012060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/943/1/012060

[9] Haapio, A., Viitaniemi, P., 2008. A Critical Review of Building Environmental Assessment Tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 28(7), 469–482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2008.01.002

[10] Ashcroft, S., 2024. LEED: Building a Greener Future for Construction. Available from: https://constructiondigital.com/sustainability-green-building/LEED-building-a-greener-future-for-construction (cited 10 May 2025).

[11] Atanda, J.O., Olukoya, O.A., 2019. Green Building Standards: Opportunities for Nigeria. Journal of Cleaner Production. 227, 366–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.189

[12] Gbonegun, V., 2020. Experts List Hinderances to Green Building Developments in Nigeria. Available from: https://guardian.ng/property/experts-list-hinderances-to-green-building-developments-in-nigeria/ (cited 15 September 2021).

[13] Amasuomo, T.T., Atanda, J., Baird, G., 2017. Development of a Building Performance Assessment and Design Tool for Residential Buildings in Nigeria. Procedia Engineering. 180, 221–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.181

[14] Assefa, S., Lee, H.-Y., Shiue, F.-J., et al., 2022. Sustainability Performance of Green Building Rating Systems (GBRSs) in an Integration Model. Buildings. 12(2), 208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020208

[15] Shan, M., Hwang, B.G., 2018. Green Building Rating Systems: Global Reviews of Practices and Research Efforts. Sustainable Cities and Society. 39, 172–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.034

[16] Sustainable Investment Group (SIG), 2020. Top 12 Green Building Rating Systems. Available from: https://sigearth.com/top-12-green-building-rating-systems/ (cited 15 October 2025).

[17] Isimbi, D., Park, J., 2022. The Analysis of the EDGE Certification System on Residential Complexes to Improve Sustainability and Affordability. Buildings. 12(10), 1729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101729

[18] Clark, C.E., 2021. Green Building Overview and Issues. Congressional Research Service: Washington, DC, USA. Available from: https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R46719

[19] Green Building Initiative, 2026. About GBI: Sustainable, healthy, and resilient buildings for all. Available from: http://www.greenglobes.com/about.asp (cited 15 October 2025).

[20] Forsberg, M., de Souza, C.B., 2020. Implementing Regenerative Standards in Politically Green Nordic Social Welfare States: Can Sweden Adopt the Living Building Challenge? Sustainability. 13(2), 738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020738

[21] Building and Construction Authority, 2026. Green Mark Certification Scheme. Available from: https://www1.bca.gov.sg/sustainability/greenmark/ (cited 15 October 2025).

[22] Hong Kong Green Building Council Limited, 2026. BEAM Plus Introduction. Available from: https://www.hkgbc.org.hk/eng/beam-plus/introduction/ (cited 15 October 2025).

[23] Karunathilake, H., Anuradha, S., Punchihewa, H., et al., 2024. Green Building Rating Systems: Insights for Implementing Sustainable Building Practices in Sri Lanka. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Sustainable Built Environment (ICSBE), Kandy, Sri Lanka, 20–22 December 2024; pp. 693–705.

[24] Morton, S.M., Bandara, D.K., Robinson, E.M., et al., 2012. In the 21st Century, What Is an Acceptable Response Rate? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 36(2), 106–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00854.x

[25] Banani, R., Vahdati, M.M., Shahrestani, M., et al., 2016. The Development of Building Assessment Criteria Framework for Sustainable Non-Residential Buildings in Saudi Arabia. Sustainable Cities and Society. 26, 289–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.07.007

[26] Afolabi, A.O., Tunji-Olayeni, P.F., Oyeyipo, O.O., et al., 2017. The Socio-Economics of Women Inclusion in Green Construction. Construction Economics and Building. 17(1), 70–89.

[27] Adewolu, A.O., 2023. Green Building Certification in Nigeria: A Comparative Study of Selected Rating Systems. International Journal of Engineering Inventions. 12(5), 233–240.

[28] Felgueiras, F., Mourão, Z., Moreira, A., et al., 2023. Indoor environmental quality in offices and risk of health and productivity complaints at work: A literature review. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances. 10, 100314.

[29] Elnagar, E., Düvier, C., Batra, Z., et al., 2024. Creating a comprehensive framework for design, construction and management of healthy buildings. Energy and Buildings. 324, 114883.

Downloads

How to Cite

Wahab, A. B., Olaoye, F. O., Omojola, S. O., Ngwoke, N. V., Ipadeola, P. O., & Olukoya, B. F. O. (2026). Assessment of the Applicability of Green Building Rating System in Mitigating Impacts of Building Projects. Urban Planning and Construction, 4(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.55121/upc.v4i1.1130

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (May 2026): In Progress

Copyright & License

Copyright (c) 2026 Akeem Bolaji Wahab, Fola Oluwatimilehin Olaoye, Samuel Oludare Omojola, Nwora Valentine Ngwoke, Peter Oluwapelumi Ipadeola, Bidemi Funmilola Olukoya Olukoya

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.