Abstract

Positive psychology offers a valuable framework for supporting student wellbeing, confidence, and optimism,
particularly among students entering higher education through non-traditional pathways. This study evaluated Be Positive, a 12-week, asynchronous positive psychology intervention piloted in an Australian Enabling program designed to prepare students for undergraduate study. The program used animated videos, information sheets, and reflective activities to introduce strategies for reframing unhelpful thinking, managing stress, cultivating positive emotions, and strengthening adaptive study behaviours. Qualitative data were collected through weekly surveys and focus groups and analysed using the Framework Method in conjunction with the Discourse Force Framework, which examines purpose, cognitive structure, behavioural intent, and emotional resonance in educational multimedia. Findings indicate that students valued the program’s accessible language, relatable scenarios, visual metaphors, and practical strategies. Participants described greater awareness of their thinking patterns, increased use of positive self-talk and reframing, improved capacity to respond to academic stress, and stronger motivation to persist with study. The materials also normalised struggle and fostered emotional connection, helping students interpret setbacks as part of learning rather than evidence of personal inadequacy. Drawing on these findings, the paper proposes a Positive Psychology-Informed Whole-Person Learning Framework that integrates cognitive, emotional, behavioural, and social dimensions in the design and evaluation of wellbeing interventions. The study
demonstrates how carefully designed positive psychology initiatives can support integral human flourishing, engagement, and academic confidence among Enabling students.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] James, T., 2024. Is University for Me? Bridging the Gap: Equity Students Journey to University through an Enabling Program [PhD Thesis]. University of Tasmania: Hobart, Australia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25959/27927849
  2. [2] Walters, V., James, T., 2020. ANTS and POTS: Do they change lives? Students' perceptions on the value of positive psychology concepts. Student Success. 11(1), 46–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v11i1.1461
  3. [3] Morgan, B., Simmons, L., Ayles, N., 2023. Flourish-HE: An online positive education programme to promote university student wellbeing. Frontiers in Education. 8, 1124983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1124983
  4. [4] Willans, J.A., 2010. Navigating Personal Change: Transforming Perceptions of Self as Learner [PhD Thesis]. CQUniversity: Rockhampton, Australia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25946/13459547
  5. [5] Crawford, N.L., Johns, S., 2018. An academic's role? Supporting student wellbeing in pre-university enabling programs. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. 15(3), 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53761/1.15.3.2
  6. [6] Crawford, N., Lisciandro, J., Jones, A., et al., 2016. Models of support for student wellbeing in enabling programs: Comparisons, contrasts and commonalities at four Australian universities. In Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial Conference of the Foundation and Bridging Educators New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand, 1–2 December 2016; pp. 1–18. Available from: https://fabenz.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Nicole-Crawford.pdf
  7. [7] Nieuwoudt, J.E., 2021. Psychological distress among students in enabling education: An exploratory study. Australian Journal of Adult Learning. 61(1), 6–25.
  8. [8] Habel, C., Whitman, K., Stokes, J., 2016. Exploring the Experience of Low-SES Students via Enabling Pathways. National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education, Curtin University: Perth, Australia. Available from: https://www.acses.edu.au/publication/exploring-the-experience-of-low-ses-students-via-enabling-pathways/
  9. [9] Taylor, J.A., van Eyk, T., Syme, S., 2020. Enabling success at university: The impact of an Australian programme to provide access to university. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 44(1), 69–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1504011
  10. [10] Phan, H.P., Ngu, B.H., Shih, J.-H., et al., 2020. Validating 'optimizing' concepts: The importance of personal resolve, effective functioning, and academic striving. Educational Psychology. 40(4), 448–472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1693507
  11. [11] Phan, H.P., Ngu, B.H., 2022. Advancing the study of "Goals of Best Practice": Toward achieving optimal best – educational implications to developments in flow research and positive optimal psychology. Frontiers in Psychology. 13, 838560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.838560
  12. [12] Phan, H.P., Ngu, B.H., Chen, S.-C., et al., 2021. Empirical validation of the psychological concept of a perceived feeling of 'energy': Advancement into the study of positive psychology. PLOS ONE. 16(11), e0259762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259762
  13. [13] Holmes, K., 2019. Neuroscience, mindfulness and holistic wellness reflections on interconnectivity in teaching and learning. Interchange. 50(3), 445–460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-019-09360-6
  14. [14] Linley, P.A., Joseph, S., Harrington, S., et al., 2006. Positive psychology: Past, present, and (possible) future. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 1(1), 3–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760500372796
  15. [15] Seary, K., Willans, J., 2020. Pastoral care and the caring teacher – value adding to enabling education. Student Success. 11(1), 12–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v11i1.1456
  16. [16] James, T., Walters, V., 2020. How positive is positive psychology in an enabling program? Investigating the transformative power of positive psychology for enabling students. Australian Journal of Adult Learning. 60(2), 170–189.
  17. [17] Schreiner, L.A., 2010. The "thriving quotient": A new vision for student success. About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience. 15(2), 2–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.20016
  18. [18] Fredrickson, B.L., 2001. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist. 56(3), 218–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
  19. [19] Barry, M.M., 2009. Addressing the determinants of positive mental health: Concepts, evidence and practice. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion. 11(3), 4–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14623730.2009.9721788
  20. [20] Hobbs, C., Armitage, J., Hood, B., et al., 2022. A systematic review of the effect of university positive psychology courses on student psychological wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology. 13, 1023140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1023140
  21. [21] Gilmore, A.H., McNeilage, A.G., Ashton-James, C.E., 2025. A scoping review of factors associated with Australian university student wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing. 15(1), 4063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v15i1.4063
  22. [22] Zhao, G.X., Zhao, M.Y., Bean, C.R., et al., 2025. Well-being interventions in U.S. colleges: A scoping review from a positive higher education perspective. Frontiers in Psychology. 16, 1601955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1601955
  23. [23] Hall, D.A., Juliana, J., Manickam, M., et al., 2024. Contributions of positive psychology to higher education across Asia: A scoping review and unifying thematic framework. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. 33(5), 1275–1285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00798-y
  24. [24] Zhoc, K.C.H., Cai, Y., Yeung, S.S., et al., 2022. Subjective wellbeing and emotion regulation strategies: How are they associated with student engagement in online learning during COVID-19? British Journal of Educational Psychology. 92(4), 1537–1549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12513
  25. [25] Kahu, E.R., Stephens, C., Leach, L., et al., 2013. The engagement of mature distance students. Higher Education Research & Development. 32(5), 791–804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.777036
  26. [26] Tokuhama-Espinosa, T., 2011. Mind, Brain, and Education Science: A Comprehensive Guide to the New Brain-Based Teaching, 1st ed. W.W. Norton & Company: New York, NY, USA.
  27. [27] Young, T., MacInnes, S., Jarden, A., et al., 2022. The impact of a wellbeing program imbedded in university classes: The importance of valuing happiness, baseline wellbeing and practice frequency. Studies in Higher Education. 47(4), 751–770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1793932
  28. [28] Norwich, B., Moore, D., Stentiford, L., et al., 2022. A critical consideration of 'mental health and wellbeing' in education: Thinking about school aims in terms of wellbeing. British Educational Research Journal. 48(4), 803–820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3795
  29. [29] Henning, M.A., Krägeloh, C.U., Moir, F., et al., 2023. Wellbeing in Higher Education: Harnessing Mind and Body Potentialities. Routledge: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003102687
  30. [30] Lambert, L., Passmore, H.-A., Joshanloo, M., 2019. A positive psychology intervention program in a culturally-diverse university: Boosting happiness and reducing fear. Journal of Happiness Studies. 20(4), 1141–1162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9993-z
  31. [31] Waters, L., Algoe, S.B., Dutton, J., et al., 2022. Positive psychology in a pandemic: Buffering, bolstering, and building mental health. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 17(3), 303–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2021.1871945
  32. [32] Erez, A., Isen, A.M., 2002. The influence of positive affect on the components of expectancy motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology. 87(6), 1055–1067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1055
  33. [33] Fredrickson, B.L., 2013. Positive emotions broaden and build. In: Devine, P., Plant, A. (Eds.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 47. Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA. pp. 1–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00001-2
  34. [34] Laakso, M., Fagerlund, Å., Pesonen, A.-K., et al., 2023. The impact of the positive education program flourishing students on early adolescents' daily positive and negative emotions using the experience sampling method. The Journal of Early Adolescence. 43(4), 385–417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316221105582
  35. [35] Bandura, A., 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman: New York, NY, USA.
  36. [36] Hof, S., 2026. Unravelling the impact of the 'Be Positive' pilot programme at CQUniversity: Exploring educator perspectives on Enabling students' personal growth and well-being. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning. 28(1), 27–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5456/WPLL.28.1.27
  37. [37] Maurer, M.M., Daukantaitė, D., 2020. Revisiting the organismic valuing process theory of personal growth: A theoretical review of Rogers and its connection to positive psychology. Frontiers in Psychology. 11, 1706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01706
  38. [38] Rogers, C.R., 1964. Toward a modern approach to values: The valuing process in the mature person. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 68(2), 160–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046419
  39. [39] Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M., 2012. Self-determination theory. In: Van Lange, P.A.M., Kruglanski, A.W., Higgins, E.T. (Eds.). Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, Volume 1. SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. pp. 416–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21
  40. [40] Ryan, R.M., Duineveld, J.J., Di Domenico, S.I., et al., 2022. We know this much is (meta-analytically) true: A meta-review of meta-analytic findings evaluating self-determination theory. Psychological Bulletin. 148(11–12), 813–842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000385
  41. [41] Liu, C., Elms, P., 2019. Animating student engagement: The impacts of cartoon instructional videos on learning experience. Research in Learning Technology. 27, 2124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v27.2124
  42. [42] O'Neill, R., James, T., Hof, S., et al., 2024. Thriving, not just surviving: Using positive psychology to build psychological wellbeing in pre-tertiary students. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. 21(10), 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53761/vzg13r44
  43. [43] James, T., Knight, B., 2025. Learning that resonates: The Discourse Force Framework for holistic evaluation. Learning Letters. 5, 64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20851/ll.v5.64
  44. [44] Gale, N.K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., et al., 2013. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 13(1), 117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
  45. [45] Schneider, S., Beege, M., Nebel, S., et al., 2022. The Cognitive-Affective-Social Theory of Learning in digital Environments (CASTLE). Educational Psychology Review. 34(1), 1–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09626-5
  46. [46] Zull, J.E., 2002. The Art of Changing the Brain: Enriching the Practice of Teaching by Exploring the Biology of Learning. Stylus Publishing: Sterling, VA, USA.
  47. [47] Larsen, A., James, T., 2022. A sense of belonging in Australian higher education: The significance of self-efficacy and the student-educator relationship. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. 19(4), 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.4.5

How to Cite

Trixie James, Sara Hof, Katrina Johnston, Ruth O'Neill. Promoting Integral Human Flourishing through a Holistic Positive Psychology Intervention in Higher Education. Journal of Education and Learning Environments. 2 September 2026. https://doi.org/10.55121/jele.v2i2.102293
Citation formats

Copyright & License

Copyright © 2026 Trixie James, Sara Hof, Katrina Johnston, Ruth O'Neill. Published by Japan Bilingual Publishing Co..

Article Metrics

574Abstract views
247Downloads