Exploring Hindering and Facilitating Mechanisms of Digital Awareness and the Role of Intra- and Interpersonal Factors via a Scoping Review of Research

Authors

  • Leonie Brummer *

    Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55121/jele.v1i1.818

Keywords:

Digital Awareness, Digital Literacy, Digital Citizenship, Lifelong Learning, Intrapersonal Factors, Interpersonal Factors

Abstract

Our current society requires individuals to be sufficiently digitally literate, and these individuals can be labelled as digital citizens—(success)fully participating in and operating on different levels of our society, such as in public, work, and/or private lives. With our increasingly digitally mediated society, identifying hindering and facilitating mechanisms and intra- and interpersonal factors provides us insight into the influential factors to become digital aware and/or to increase the quality of the awareness—with subsequent consequences for society and education. Via a scoping review of the last nine years and covering 42 articles, these mechanisms and individual factors are reported on in existing research about digital literacy and digital citizenship—reasoning that these mechanisms and factors also influence digital awareness. Facilitating mechanisms and intrapersonal factors (e.g., skills, knowledge) were mentioned more often than hindering mechanisms (e.g., disengagement) and interpersonal factors (e.g., communication). Method sections included fewer factors than introductions, allowing for sufficient delimitation of research. Overall, there was a cognitive dominance of facilitators/hindrances and intrapersonal factors. Overlap exists between hindrances and facilitators; these can be considered two ends of a spectrum (e.g., disengagement and engagement). Furthermore, the interplay of hindrances and facilitators and intrapersonal factors calls for more research to reveal unique contributions of each factor.

References

[1] Brummer, L., 2025. Conceptualizing Digital Awareness: Introducing a Definition of Digital Awareness as an Extension of Digital Literacy and Digital Citizenship. Innovations in Pedagogy and Technology. 1(2), 44–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63385/ipt.v1i2.125

[2] Beiswenger, K.L., Grolnick, W.S., 2010. Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Factors Associated With Autonomous Motivation in Adolescents’ After-School Activities. The Journal of Early Adolescence. 30(3), 369–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431609333298

[3] Rimal, R.N., 2003. Intergenerational Transmission of Health: The Role of Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Communicative Factors. Health Education & Behavior. 30(1), 10–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198102239256

[4] Helsper, E.J., 2008. Digital Inclusion: An Analysis of Social Disadvantage and the Information Society. Department for Communities and Local Government: London, UK.

[5] Jaeger, P.T., Bertot, J.C., Thompson, K.M., et al., 2012. The Intersection of Public Policy and Public Access: Digital Divides, Digital Literacy, Digital Inclusion, and Public Libraries. Public Library Quarterly. 31(1), 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2012.654728

[6] Littlejohn, A., Beetham, H., McGill, L., 2012. Learning at the Digital Frontier: A Review of Digital Literacies in Theory and Practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 28(6), 547–556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00474.x

[7] Gilster, P., 1997. Digital Literacy. Wiley: New York, NY, USA.

[8] Martínez-Bravo, M.-C., Sádaba-Chalezquer, C., Serrano-Puche, J., 2020. Fifty Years of Digital Literacy Studies: A Meta-research for Interdisciplinary and Conceptual Convergence. Profesional de la Información. 29(4), 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.jul.28

[9] UNESCO, 2011. Media and Information Literacy: Curriculum for Teachers. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000192971?posInSet=8&queryId=28c42b34-5f6e-4a02-9258-8e2fb2d5f4f1 (cited 15 November 2021).

[10] UNESCO, 2018. A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy Skills for Indicator 4.4.2. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265403?posInSet=1&queryId=0e0a5c7b-496d-443d-bbd2-039bed2a5179 (cited 15 November 2021).

[11] Frau-Meigs, D., 2022. How Disinformation Reshaped the Relationship Between Journalism and Media and Information Literacy (MIL): Old and New Perspectives Revisited. Digital Journalism. 10(5), 912–922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2081863

[12] Hintz, A., Dencik, L., Wahl-Jorgensen, K., 2019. Citizenship in a Digital Age. Digital Citizenship in a Datafied Society. Polity Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 20–42.

[13] Ribble, M., 2007. The Nine Elements of Digital Citizenship. In: Ribble, M. (Ed.). Digital Citizenship in Schools, 1st ed. International Society for Technology in Education: Eugene, Oregon, USA. pp. 23–56.

[14] Okada, A., Sherborne, T., Panselinas, G., et al., 2025. Fostering Transversal Skills Through Open Schooling Supported by the CARE-KNOW-DO Pedagogical Model and the UNESCO AI Competencies Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 1–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-025-00458-w

[15] Bawden, D., 2008. Origins and Concepts of Digital Literacy. In: Lankshear, C., Knobel, M. (Eds.). Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices, 1st ed. Peter Lang Publishing: New York, NY, USA. pp. 17–32.

[16] Darlis, V., Sari, D.K., 2021. The Effectiveness of Blended Learning: The Impact of Student’s Characteristics and Digital Literacy on Student Performance. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance (ICED-QA 2020), Padang, Indonesia, 20–22 August 2020; pp. 561–566.

[17] Djihad, G., Khadidja, M., 2025. The Identity Crisis in the Context of Achieving Digital Citizenship. Science, Education and Innovations in the Context of Modern Problems. 8(4), 822–831.

[18] Vromen, A., Xenos, M.A., Loader, B., 2015. Young People, Social Media and Connective Action: From Organisational Maintenance to Everyday Political Talk. Journal of Youth Studies. 18(1), 80–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2014.933198

[19] Gardenier, A.M., Van Est, R., Royakkers, L., 2024. Technological Citizenship in Times of Digitization: An Integrative Framework. Digital Society. 3, 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-024-00106-1

[20] Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G.V., et al., 1996. Multifaceted Impact of Self-Efficacy Beliefs on Academic Functioning. Child Development. 67, 1206–1222.

[21] Jünger, M., Mietzner, M., 2020. Banking Goes Digital: The Adoption of FinTech Services by German Households. Finance Research Letters. 34, 101260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.08.008

[22] Prior, D.D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., et al., 2016. Attitude, Digital Literacy and Self-Efficacy: Flow-on Effect for Online Learning Behaviour. The Internet and Higher Education. 29, 91–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.01.001

[23] Lu, C., Gu, M.M., 2025. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Factors and Outcomes of Digital Citizenship Among Adults. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. 45(5), 1130–1145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2023.2296352

[24] Brandtzaeg, P.B., Følstad, A., Skjuve, M., 2025. Emerging AI Individualism: How Young People Integrate Social AI into Everyday Life. Communication and Change. 1(11), 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44382-025-00011-2

[25] Schunk, D.H., Pajares, F., 2009. Self-Efficacy Theory. In: Wentzel, K.R., Miele, D.B. (Eds.). Handbook of Motivation at School, 1st ed. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 35–54.

[26] Chu, R.J., Chu, A.Z., 2010. Multi-level Analysis of Peer Support, Internet Self-Efficacy and e-Learning Outcomes: The Contextual Effect of Collectivism and Group Potency. Computers & Education. 55(1), 145–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.011

[27] Moos, D.C., Azevedo, R., 2009. Self-Efficacy and Prior Domain Knowledge: To What Extent Does Monitoring Mediate Their Relationship With Hypermedia Learning? Metacognition and Learning. 4, 197–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-009-9045-5

[28] Candrasari, Y., 2019. Mediated Interpersonal Communication: A New Way of Social Interaction in the Digital Age. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Media Conference 2019 (IMC 2019), Surabaya, Indonesia, 7–8 November 2019; pp. 537–548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200325.041

[29] Williams, N.N., 2016. Digital Mirror: An Examination of Social Media’s Influence on Late Adolescent Black Females’ Global Self-Concept [PhD thesis]. University of North Carolina at Charlotte: Charlotte, NC, USA. pp. 1–20.

[30] Jiang, L.C., Bazarova, N.N., Hancock, J.T., 2010. The Disclosure-Intimacy Link in Computer-Mediated Communication: An Attributional Extension of the Hyperpersonal Model. Human Communication Research. 37(1), 58–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01393.x

[31] Venter, E., 2019. Challenges for Meaningful Interpersonal Communication in a Digital Era. HTS Theological Studies. 75(1), 1–6.

[32] Mandal, F.B., 2014. Nonverbal Communication in Humans. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment. 24(4), 417–421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2013.831288

[33] Bliss-Carroll, N.L., 2016. The Nature, Function and Value of Emojis as Contemporary Tools of Digital Interpersonal Communication [Master’s thesis]. Gardner-Webb University: Boiling Springs, NC, USA. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/openview/4bac706f3d5d372f5ebf4107a9ae2ce0/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750 (cited 13 February 2025).

[34] Elcıcek, M., Erdemci, H., Karal, H., 2018. Examining the Relationship Between the Levels of Digital Citizenship and Social Presence for Graduate Students Having Online Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 19(1), 203–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.382801

[35] Takavarasha, S., Chilliers, L., Chinyamurdindi, W., 2018. Navigating the Unbeaten Track From Digital Literacy to Digital Citizenship: A Case of University Students in South Africa’s Eastern Cape Province. Reading & Writing – Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa. 9(1), 1–15. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-1348580955

[36] Machackova, H., Bedrosovaa, M.J., Muzika, M., et al., 2021. Digital Skills Among Youth: A Dataset From a Three-Wave Longitudinal Survey in Six European Countries. Data in Brief. 54, 110396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.110396

[37] Schreurs, K., Quan-Haase, A., Martin, K., 2017. Problematizing the Digital Literacy Paradox in the Context of Older Adults’ ICT Use: Aging, Media Discourse, and Self-Determination. Canadian Journal of Communication. 42(2), 359–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2017v42n2a3130

[38] Son, J.-B., Park, S.-S., Park, M., 2017. Digital Literacy of Language Learners in Two Different Contexts. The JALT CALL Journal. 13(2), 77–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v13n2.j213

[39] Liu, G.L., Darvin, R., Ma, C., 2024. Exploring AI-Mediated Informal Digital Learning of English (AI-IDLE): A Mixed Method Investigation of Chinese EFL Learners’ AI Adoption and Experiences. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 1–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2310288

[40] Phillips, A.L., Lee, V.R., 2019. Whose Responsibility Is It? A State-wide Survey of School Librarians on Responsibilities and Resources for Teaching Digital Citizenship. School Library Research. 22, 1–20.

[41] Mugheri, N.A., 2017. The Theoretical Rebuilding of Literacy in Pakistan Apropos Custom to Contemporary Technology. Language in India. 17(8), 337–350.

[42] Anisimova, E.S., 2020. Digital Literacy of Future Preschool Teachers. Journal of Social Studies Education Research. 11(1), 230–253.

[43] Kim, K.T., 2019. The Structural Relationship Among Digital Literacy, Learning Strategies, and Core Competencies Among South Korean College Students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. 19(2), 3–21.

[44] Grncharovska, S.P., Osmani, F., Stankovska, G., 2016. The Impact of the Students’ Gender and High School Type on the Level of Digital Competency Development for Lifelong Learning. Journal of Education and Practice. 7(24), 108–114.

[45] Casero-Ripollés, A., 2017. Producing Political Content for Web 2.0: Empowering Citizens and Vulnerable Populations. El Profesional de la Información. 26(1), 13–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.ene.02

[46] Jwaifell, M., 2018. The Proper Use of Technologies as a Digital Citizenship Indicator: Undergraduate English Language Students at Al-Hussein Bin Talal University. World Journal of Education. 8(3), 86–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v8n3p86

[47] Eckert, S., Metzger-Riftkin, J., Nurmis, J., 2018. Teaching Girls Online Skills: Results of the Wikid Grrls Intervention. Journal of Media Literacy Education. 10(3), 20–42.

[48] Sivrikaya, M.H., 2020. An Analysis on Digital Literacy Level of Faculty of Sports Science Students. Asian Journal of Education and Training. 6(2), 117–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2020.62.117.121

[49] Dashtestani, R., Hojatpanah, S., 2022. Digital Literacy of EFL Students in a Junior High School in Iran: Voices of Teachers, Students and Ministry Directors. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 35(4), 635–665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744664

[50] Duradoni, M., La Gamma, M., Serritella, E., 2024. Adapting to the Evolving Digital Landscape: Development and Validation of the VirtHuLab Self Efficacy Scale. Psychological Reports. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941241253601

[51] Jan, S., 2017. Investigating the Relationship Between Students’ Digital Literacy and Their Attitude Towards Using ICT. International Journal of Educational Technology. 5(2), 26–34.

[52] Dedebali, N.C., Dasdemir, I., 2019. Social Studies Teachers Candidates' Perception of Digital Citizenship. International Journal of Educational Methodology. 5(3), 465–477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.3.465

[53] Mishra, C., 2019. Faculty Perceptions of Digital Information Literacy (DIL) at an Indian University: An Exploratory Study. New Review of Academic Librarianship. 25(1), 76–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2018.1517102

[54] Mack, E.A., Marie-Pierre, L., Redican, K., 2017. Entrepreneurs' Use of Internet and Social Media Applications. Telecommunications Policy. 41(2), 120–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.12.001

[55] Alqahtani, A., Alqahtani, F., Alqurashi, M., 2017. The Extent of Comprehension and Knowledge With Respect to Digital Citizenship Among Middle Eastern and US Students at UNC. Journal of Education and Practice. 8(9), 96–102.

[56] Surmelioglu, Y., Seferoglu, S.S., 2019. An Examination of Digital Footprint Awareness and Digital Experiences of Higher Education Students. World Journal of Educational Technology: Current Issues. 11(1), 48–64.

[57] Baterna, H.B., Mina, T.D.G., Rogayan, D.V., 2020. Digital Literacy of STEM Senior High School Students: Basis for Enhancement Program. International Journal of Technology in Education. 3(2), 105–117.

[58] English, J.A., 2016. A Digital Literacy Initiative in Honors: Perceptions of Students and Instructors About Its Impact on Learning and Pedagogy. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council. 17(2), 533. Available from: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal/533/

[59] Çam, E., Kiyici, M., 2017. Perceptions of Prospective Teachers on Digital Literacy. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology. 5(4), 29–44.

[60] Kim, M., Choi, D., 2018. Development of Youth Digital Citizenship Scale and Implication for Educational Setting. Educational Technology & Society. 21(1), 155–171.

[61] Hauck, M., 2019. Virtual Exchange for (Critical) Digital Literacy Skills Development. European Journal of Language Policy. 11(2), 187–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/ejlp.2019.12

[62] Erdem, C., Koçyiğit, M., 2019. Exploring Undergraduates' Digital Citizenship Levels: Adaptation of the Digital Citizenship Scale to Turkish. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology. 7(3), 22–38.

[63] Teimouri, M., Benrazavi, S.R., Griffiths, M.D., et al., 2018. A Model of Online Protection to Reduce Children's Online Risk Exposure: Empirical Evidence From Asia. Sexuality & Culture. 22, 1205–1229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9522-6

[64] Kara, N., 2018. Understanding University Students’ Thoughts and Practices About Digital Citizenship: A Mixed Methods Study. Educational Technology & Society. 21(1), 172–185.

[65] Clark, T., Simpson, C., 2020. Using a Student-Staff Partnership to Map, Understand, and Develop the Digital Curriculum. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 32(1), 138–148.

[66] Nordin, M., Ahmad, T., Zubairi, A., 2016. Psychometric Properties of a Digital Citizenship Questionnaire. International Educational Studies. 9(3), 71–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n3p71

[67] García-Valcárcel Muñoz-Repiso, A., Casillas Martín, S., Basilotta Gómez-Pablos, V., 2020. Validation of an Indicator Model (INCODIES) for Assessing Student Digital Competence in Basic Education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research. 9, 110–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.1.459

[68] Alturki, K.I., Alharbi, W.O., 2018. Social Media Contribution to the Promotion of Digital Citizenship Among Female Students at Imam Mohammed Bin Saud Islamic University in Riyadh. English Language Teaching. 11(1), 80–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n1p80

[69] Alsalem, M.A., 2016. Redefining Literacy: The Realities of Digital Literacy for Students With Disabilities in K–12. Journal of Education and Practice. 7(32), 205–215.

[70] Hamutoglu, N.B., Gemikoakli, O., de Raffaele, C., et al., 2020. Comparative Cross-Cultural Study in Digital Literacy. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 88, 121–148.

[71] Baskara, F.R., 2025. Conceptualizing Digital Literacy for the AI Era: A Framework for Preparing Students in an AI-Driven World. Data and Metadata. 4(530), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025530

[72] Greene, J.A., Crompton, H., 2025. Synthesizing Definitions of Digital Literacy for the Web 3.0. TechTrends. 69, 21–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-01015-3

[73] Lan, M., Liu, H., Pan, Q., 2025. Unpacking the Digital Literacy–Self-Regulated Learning Nexus: A Systematic Review and a Three-Level Meta-Analysis. Educational Research Review. 48, 100713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100713

[74] Tan, C.Y., Xu, N., Liang, M., et al., 2025. Meta-Analysis of Associations Between Digital Parenting and Children’s Wellbeing. Educational Research Review. 48, 100699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100699

[75] Styron, R.A., Bonner, J.L., Styron, J.L., 2016. Are Teacher and Principal Candidates Prepared to Address Student Cyberbullying? The Journal of At-Risk Issues. 19(1), 19–28.

[76] Valbuena, G., Van der Schaaf, M., O’Sullivan, P., et al., 2021. When I Say… Attitude. Medical Education. 55(8), 892–893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14470

[77] Tricco, A.C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., et al., 2018. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine. 169(7), 467–473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

[78] Moreno de Diezmas, E.N., Manzano, P.D., 2016. PLEs in Primary School: The Learners’ Experience in the Piplep Project. Digital Education Review. 29, 45–61.

[79] Sulianta, F., Sapriya, S., Supriatna, N., et al., 2019. Digital Content Model Framework Based on Social Studies Education. International Journal of Higher Education. 8(5), 214–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n5p214

[80] Alaleeli, S., Alnajjar, A., 2020. The Arab Digital Generation's Engagement With Technology: The Case of High School Students in the UAE. Journal of Technology and Science Education. 10(1), 159–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.756

[81] Dedebali, N.C., 2020. Analysis of Digital Literacy and Metaphoric Perceptions of Teacher Candidate. International Journal of Educational Methodology. 6(1), 135–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.1.135

[82] Hollandsworth, R., Donovan, J., Welch, M., 2018. Digital Citizenship: You Can’t Go Home Again. TechTrends. 61, 524–530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0190-4

Downloads

How to Cite

Brummer, L. (2025). Exploring Hindering and Facilitating Mechanisms of Digital Awareness and the Role of Intra- and Interpersonal Factors via a Scoping Review of Research. Journal of Education and Learning Environments, 1(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.55121/jele.v1i1.818

Issue

Section

Article