Techno-Economic Assessment of Rice Seedling-Raising Trays in Northern Iran

Authors

  • Alireza Allameh *

    Rice Research Institute of Iran (RRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Rasht 41996-13475, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55121/nc.v5i1.440

Keywords:

Rice, Mechanized Transplanting, Seedling Trays, Seedling Vigor, Crop Yield, Techno-Economic Assessment

Abstract

Mechanized rice transplanting has become an essential practice in modern rice cultivation due to its economic advantages, reduced labor requirements, and shorter operation time compared with manual transplanting. However, successful mechanized transplanting depends on the provision of high-quality mat-type seedlings, which are produced in specially designed plastic trays. These trays play a critical role in seedling establishment and ultimately influence crop performance. In this study, nine types of rice seedling-raising trays were evaluated—four made from high-quality virgin materials and five from recycled plastics—to assess their effects on seedling mat quality, transplanting efficiency, yield, and yield components. The experiment was conducted using a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. Results showed that seedling mats raised in high-quality trays (P10, PK, P50, and RF) exhibited significantly better performance (p < 0.05) compared to those raised in recycled trays. Seedlings grown in quality trays had greater shoot cross-sectional area and higher strength, resulting in improved mechanical transplanting efficiency. Key transplanting traits—including the number of hills per unit area, hill spacing uniformity, number of seedlings per hill, and rates of missing, buried, or damaged seedlings—were all significantly superior in the quality tray treatments. Similarly, grain yield and yield components were significantly higher for seedlings raised in quality trays, which also demonstrated greater resistance to lodging. In contrast, recycled trays exhibited substantial deformation (bulging, twisting, and breakage) due to weak polymer bonding, leading to poor mat uniformity. The economic analysis confirmed that, despite their higher purchase price, using quality trays was economically justified, with a production cost of approximately 0.23 USD per kilogram of paddy, compared with 0.29 USD for recycled trays

References

[1] Hossain, M.A., Becker, K., 2002. In vitro rumen degradability of crude protein in seeds from four Sesbania spp. and the effects of treatments designed to reduce the levels of antinutrients in the seeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 95(1–2), 49–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00310-8

[2] Chand, S.P., Gautam, S., Karki, R., et al., 2025. Productivity and basic economics in spring paddy production by mechanical rice transplanter versus traditional manual method. Discover Agriculture. 3, 209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-025-00360-y

[3] Akmal, N., Hussain, A., Yousaf, M., et al., 2023. Exploring potential of mechanical transplanting of rice in Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research. 36(2), 169–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2023/36.2.169.182

[4] Sarkar, S., Saha, C.K., Ahamed, S., et al., 2024. Mechanical rice transplanting: A profitable business for Bangladeshi agropreneurs. Journal of Agricultural Machinery and Bioresources Engineering. 8(1), 202–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61361/jambe.v8i1.7

[5] Alizadeh, M.R., Yadollahinia, A.R., Rahimi-Ajdadi, F., 2011. Techno-economic performance of a self-propelled rice transplanter and comparison with hand transplanting for hybrid rice variety. International Journal of Natural and Engineering Sciences. 5(3), 27–30.

[6] Mamun, M.A.A., Rana, M.M., Miranda, A.J., 2013. Tray soil management in raising seedlings for rice transplanter. Canadian Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences. 7(3), 2481–2489.

[7] Niu, G., Wang, G., Li, B., et al., 2014. Design of rice factory three-dimensional carpet raising seedlings system engineering. IERI Procedia. 8, 93–100.

[8] He, H., You, C., Wu, H., et al., 2017. Effects of nursery tray and transplanting methods on rice yield. Agronomy Journal. 110(1), 104–114.

[9] Wayayok, A., Mohammad, U., Zubairu, U.B., et al., 2017. Comparative study on the performance of rice seedlings raised by single seedling nursery tray method and conventional system. American Journal of Plant Biology. 2(1), 1–4.

[10] Andoniaina, R.M., Yakiyama, H., Shoji, K., 2018. Thirty-row arrayed rice mat seedlings. Journal of JSAMFE. 80(5), 320–321.

[11] Shaikh, N.Y., Ashraful Alam, M., Kamruzzaman, M., et al., 2021. Effect of seedling density on mat type seedling quality for mechanical transplanting in dry season rice. Agricultural Sciences. 12, 1231–1243.

[12] Padasht Dehkaee, F., Tajadodi Talab, K., Alizadeh, M., et al., 2016. Rice Instructions: Planting, Protecting, Harvesting, and Post-Harvest Operations. Agricultural Teaching Publication: Lexington, KY, USA.

[13] CSAM & UN ESCAP, 2017. ANTAM Standard Code for Testing of Paddy Transplanters. CSAM: Beijing, China.

[14] Rikhter, P., Dinc, I., Zhang, Y., et al., 2022. Life cycle environmental impacts of plastics: A review (NIST GCR 22-032). National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

[15] Zhang, J., Tong, T., Potcho, P.M., et al., 2020. Nitrogen effects on yield, quality and physiological characteristics of giant rice. Agronomy. 10(11), 1816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111816

[16] Yao, X., Yang, W., Ren, W., 2009. Effects of seedling raising methods and sowing rates on machine-transplanted long-age rice seedling. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. 25, 152–157.

[17] Islam, A.K.M.S., 2018. Rice Mechanization in Bangladesh: An Entrepreneurial Opportunity. SRL Printing Press: Dhaka, Bangladesh.

[18] Liu, Q., Zhou, X., Li, J., et al., 2017. Effects of seedling age and cultivation density on agronomic characteristics and grain yield of mechanically transplanted rice. Scientific Reports. 7, Article No. 14072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14672-7

[19] Pathania, R., Shekhar, J., Rana, S.S., et al., 2016. Evaluation of seeding rates of rice nursery on seedling vigour and its effect on crop productivity under system of rice intensification. Journal of Applied and Natural Science. 8(4), 2224–2230. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/574b/374605cec53dd7eaf2e77a2f59f4e745afeb.pdf

[20] Hossen, M.A., Hossain, M.M., Haque, M.E., et al., 2018. Effect of seed rate on seedling quality for mechanical rice transplanting. Bangladesh Rice Journal. 22, 9–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/brj.v22i1.41834

[21] Shahed, A.B.M., Hossen, M.A., Al Mamun, M.R., et al., 2020. Impact of organic substance on growth attributes of mat type rice seedlings in the trays for machine transplanting. Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics. 10, 694–708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18801/jstei.100120.70

[22] Crawford, R.J., 1981. Plastics Engineering. Pergamon Press Ltd.: Oxford, UK.

[23] Ali, M.S., Hasan, M.A., Sikder, S., et al., 2013. Effect of seedling age and water management on the performance of Boro rice (Oryza sativa L.) variety BRRI Dhan 28. The Agriculturists. 11(2), 28–37. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/agric.v11i2.17484

[24] Ibrahimi, M., Majidian, M., Alizadeh, M., 2020. Effect of tillage and planting methods on soil physical characteristics, grain yield, and milling efficiency of rice (cv. Hashemi). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 22(1), 66–80.

[25] Gholami Rezvani, N., Esfahani, M., Kabi Rahnama, S., et al., 2015. Effect of seed rate on grain yield and yield components of rice (cv. Hashemi) in direct seeding methods. Seed and Plant Production Journal. 31(2), 37–56.

[26] Singh, Y., 2013. Crop and water productivity as influenced by rice cultivation methods under organic and inorganic sources of nutrient supply. Paddy and Water Environment. 11(1–4), 531–542.

[27] Badshah, M., Naimei, T., Zou, Y., et al., 2014. Yield and tillering response of super hybrid rice Liangyoupeijiu to tillage and establishment methods. The Crop Journal. 2(1), 79–86.

[28] Huang, M., Zhou, X.F., Cao, F.B., et al., 2015. No-tillage effect on rice yield in China: a meta-analysis. Field Crops Research. 183, 126–137.

[29] Adhikari, B., Mehera, B., Haefele, S., 2013. Impact of rice nursery nutrient management, seeding density and seedling age on yield and yield attributes. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 4, 146–155.

[30] Aslam, M.M., Zeeshan, M., Irum, A., et al., 2015. Influence of seedling age and nitrogen rates on productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.): A review. In: Chen, G.Q. (Ed.). Prime Archives in Plant Sciences. Vide Leaf: Hyderabad, India.

[31] Awan, T.H., Ali, R., Manzoor, Z., et al., 2011. Effect of different nitrogen levels and row spacing on the performance of newly evolved medium grain rice variety KSK-133. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 21(2), 231–234.

[32] Vijay, J., Mahesh, L., Venkateshwar Rao, N., et al., 2024. Comparative study on cost analysis of mechanical and manual transplanting of rice. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports. 30(10), 39–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i102428

[33] Rajendran, M., Ranganathan, T., 2025. Advancements in paddy transplanter mechanization implications for sustainable agriculture. Sustainable Futures. 10, 101235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101235

Downloads

How to Cite

Allameh, A. (2025). Techno-Economic Assessment of Rice Seedling-Raising Trays in Northern Iran. New Countryside, 5(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.55121/nc.v5i1.440

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (January 2026): In Progress

Section

Article

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Alireza Allameh

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.