Philippine Food Security Paradoxities Exposed: Exploring Structural Inequities and Pathways to Sovereignty

Authors

  • Alvin Servaña

    1 School of Multidisciplinary Studies, De la Salle-College of Saint Benilde, Manila 1004, Philippines

    2 General Education, Polytechnic University of the Philippines - San Juan, San Juan City 1500, Philippines
  • Katya Manalastas *

    1 School of Multidisciplinary Studies, De la Salle-College of Saint Benilde, Manila 1004, Philippines

    3 Department of Philosophy, De la Salle University, Manila 1004, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55121/nc.v5i1.806

Keywords:

Critical Epistemology, Filipino Critical Theory, Critical Studies, Contemporary World Issues, Structural Inequality, SDG2

Abstract

This essay critically examines the persistent food security challenges in the Philippines, a nation paradoxically rich in agricultural resources yet plagued by hunger and malnutrition. Through a comprehensive four-part analysis, it systematically unpacks the complex milieus: historical, economic, political—factors shaping this crisis. Part 1 explores the historical and contemporary dynamics driving the hunger for food sovereignty, examining how export-oriented agriculture—driven by global actors, i.e., multinational corporations and international financial—has systematically marginalised small-scale farmers and eroded local food systems. Part 2 leverages Renato and Letizia Constantino’s “Distorted Priorities: The Politics of Food” to analyse the historical continuities between colonial and contemporary agricultural policies, while employing Foucault’s concepts of biopolitics and governmentality to illuminate the regulatory mechanisms perpetuating these inequities. The analysis reveals how cultural imperialism propagated by fast food chains and environmental degradation caused by monoculture farming have further complicated the nation’s food security landscape. Part 3 applies Iris Marion Young’s “Five Faces of Oppression” framework to systematically analyse exploitation, marginalisation, powerlessness, cultural imperialism, and structural violence within the Philippine food system. Part 4 synthesises these perspectives to examine critical implications for food sovereignty and proposes transformative approaches through food sovereignty principles, genuine agrarian reform, and sustainable agricultural practices. The essay concludes that by addressing structural inequalities and empowering marginalised communities through comprehensive policy reforms and grassroots initiatives, the Philippines can move towards a future where all individuals have access to nutritious, affordable, and culturally appropriate food, reflecting a commitment to social justice and environmental sustainability

References

[1] Foucault, M., 1978. The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. Pantheon Books: New York, NY, USA.

[2] Sporchia, F., Antonelli, M., Aguilar-Martínez, A., et al., 2024. Zero hunger: Future challenges and the way forward towards the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal 2. Sustain Earth Reviews. 7(10), 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-024-00078-7

[3] Valin, H., Hertel, T., Bodirsky, B.L., et al., 2021. Achieving zero hunger by 2030: A review of quantitative assessments of synergies and tradeoffs amongst the UN Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations Food Systems Summit 2021 Scientific Group. Available from: https://sc-fss2021.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/SDG2_Synergies_and_tradeoffs.pdf (cited 8 July 2025).

[4] Pecquet, J., 2018. 10 criticisms of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. The Africa Report. Available from: https://www.theafricareport.com/322366/10-criticisms-of-the-uns-sustainable-development-goals/ (cited 18 August 2025).

[5] Kraak, V.I., Niewolny, K.L., 2024. A scoping review of food systems governance frameworks and models to develop a typology for social change movements to transform food systems for people and planetary health. Sustainability. 16(4), 1469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041469

[6] Swain, R.B., 2018. A critical analysis of the Sustainable Development Goals. In: Leal Filho, W. (Ed.). Handbook of Sustainability Science and Research. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63007-6_20

[7] Byaruhanga, R., Isgren, E., 2023. Rethinking the alternatives: Food sovereignty as a prerequisite for sustainable food security. Food Ethics. 8, 16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41055-023-00126-6

[8] Smallwood, J.M., Delabre, I., Vergara, P., et al., 2023. The governmentality of tropical forests and sustainable food systems, and possibilities for post-2020 sustainability governance. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. 25(1), 103–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2082931

[9] Triki, A., 2022. Decolonising food security in the UN SDGs: Challenging the hegemonic discourse. LSE International Development Review. 2(2), 1–30.

[10] Tirmizey, K.A., 2024. The geometry of (anti)imperialism in food regime analysis. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 56(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X231214419

[11] Zurawski, E., 2025. Food desert imperialism: The colonial legacy of the food desert concept. Environmental Humanities. 17(1), 88–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-11543423

[12] Gomez y Paloma, S., Riesgo, L., Louhichi, K. (Eds.), 2020. The Role of Smallholder Farms in Food and Nutrition Security. Springer: Cham, Netherlands.

[13] Rebolledo, M., 2023. Iris Marion Young’s Five Faces of Oppression. Critical Legal Thinking. Available from: https://criticallegalthinking.com/2023/04/24/iris-marion-youngs-five-faces-of-oppression/ (cited 8 July 2025).

[14] Wahlen, S., 2025. Biopolitics of food. In Geography, Planning, and Tourism. Edward Elgar: London, UK. pp. 50–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800887435.00020

[15] Guiang, F.J.P.A., 2020. The public dimension of Renato Constantino’s ‘historically-informed social criticism’: Facets and critiques of his intellectual legacy, 1945–1978. Philippine Social Sciences Review. 72(1), 23–49.

[16] Constantino, R., Constantino, L.R., 1988. Distorted Priorities: The Politics of Food. Foundation for Nationalist Studies, Inc.: Quezon City, Philippines.

[17] Young, I.M., 1990. The five faces of oppression. In Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA. pp. 48–63.

[18] Foucault, M., 1991. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Burchell, G., Gordon, C., Miller, P. (Eds.). University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA.

[19] United Nations, 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations: New York, NY, USA.

[20] Fertilizer and Pesticide Authority (FPA), 2023. Annual Report. Fertilizer and Pesticide Authority: Quezon City, Philippines. Available from: https://fpa.da.gov.ph/annual-report-2023/

[21] Mendoza, J.E., 2023. Farm-to-market roads ‘overpriced’ by up to 70%. Inquirer.net. Available from: https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2121881/farm-to-market-roads-overpriced-by-up-to-70 (cited 18 August 2025).

[22] Department of Agriculture, 2025. Charting the Path to a Climate Resilient Agriculture. Department of Agriculture: Manila, Philippines. Available from: https://www.da.gov.ph/charting-the-path-to-a-climate-resilient-agriculture/

[23] Servaña, A., 2023. On Freud’s ‘Civilisation and its Discontents’: A Recent Revisit. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367240679_On_Freud's_Civilisation_and_its_Discontents_A_Recent_Revisit (cited 17 June 2025).

[24] Friedman, T.L., 2000. The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalisation. Picador: New York, NY, USA.

[25] Friedman, T.L., 2007. The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, 3rd ed. Picador: New York, NY, USA.

[26] Friedman, T.L., 2009. Hot, Flat, and Crowded: Why We Need a Green Revolution and How it Can Renew America, 2nd ed. Picador: New York, NY, USA.

[27] Held, D., McGrew, A., 2008. The Global Transformations Reader: An Introduction to the Globalization Debate, 2nd ed. Polity: Cambridge, UK.

Downloads

How to Cite

Servaña, A., & Manalastas, K. (2025). Philippine Food Security Paradoxities Exposed: Exploring Structural Inequities and Pathways to Sovereignty. New Countryside, 5(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.55121/nc.v5i1.806

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (January 2026): In Progress

Section

Article

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Alvin Servaña, Katya Manalastas

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.