Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more prevalent in higher education, it raises important pedagogical, ethical, and disciplinary questions. This theoretical paper develops a comprehensive theoretical foundation for considering the use of AI-generated case studies in social work education and examines the implications for teaching, learning, and professional identity formation. The theoretical framework is not exhaustive. Nevertheless, by drawing on Entwistle’s conception of deep learning, Biggs and Tang’s constructive alignment, new materialist perspectives on classroom technology assemblages, and critical discursive frameworks informed by Foucault and Packer, this paper argues that AI-generated case studies can enhance social work students’ reflexivity when used with careful oversight. AI can expand the discursive space, diversify representational possibilities, and save lecturers’ preparation time. Nevertheless, AI presents significant risks related to bias, representational ethics, and over-standardisation. Informed by practice realities, risks can be mediated by drawing on practitioner wisdom to orchestrate AI case study prompts and anchor AI-produced narratives. This theoretical paper emphasises the need for critical AI literacy, transparent governance, and educator–practitioner collaboration to ensure that AI serves as a tool for deep, anti-oppressive, and justice-oriented learning. AI-assisted case study pedagogy is shown to be most valuable when it strengthens, rather than diminishes, human judgement, reflexive practices, and relational social work education. This is a theoretical and conceptual paper. It does not report any empirical findings. Instead, it offers a structured synthesis of relevant pedagogical, philosophical, and practice-based literature to develop a framework for critically integrating AI-generated case studies into social work education.

Keywords

Artificial IntelligenceCase StudiesConstructive AlignmentDeep LearningNew MaterialismSocial Work Education

References

  1. [1] Healy, K., 2022. Social Work Theories in Context: Creating Frameworks for Practice. Bloomsbury Academic: London, UK.
  2. [2] Lee, E., Mishna, F., Brennenstuhl, S., 2010. How to Critically Evaluate Case Studies in Social Work. Research on Social Work Practice. 20(6), 682–689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731509347864
  3. [3] Littman, D.M., Bell, F., Al Wazni, A., et al., 2025. Pedagogies of Possibility: Case Studies from Using Foresight Tools in the Social Work Classroom. Social Work Education. 44(4), 930–947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2024.2368171
  4. [4] Cheung, J.C.-S., Mo, K.Y.-H., Tsang, W.W.-H., et al., 2025. Developing a User Typology of Adopting Innovative Technologies in Social Work. The British Journal of Social Work. 55(6), 3054–3073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaf087
  5. [5] Goldkind, L., Wolf, L., Glennon, A., et al., 2024. The End of the World as We Know It? ChatGPT and Social Work. Social Work. 69(1), 103–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swad044
  6. [6] Hämäläinen, J., Lindh, J., 2025. Social Work in an Information-Intensive Era: Digitalization in Social Work Practices, Expertise, Training, and Research. International Social Work. 69(2), 187–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00208728251382817
  7. [7] Báez, J.C., Bjugstad, A., Park, T.K., et al., 2025. Social Work Educators Innovating with Generative AI: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Social Work Education. 61(1), 14–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2024.2411170
  8. [8] Reamer, F.G., 2023. Artificial Intelligence in Social Work: Emerging Ethical Issues. International Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics. 20(2), 52–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55521/10-020-205
  9. [9] Entwistle, N.J., 2009. Teaching for Understanding at University: Deep Approaches and Distinctive Ways of Thinking. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, UK.
  10. [10] Biggs, J., Tang, C., 1999. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. Open University Press: Maidenhead, UK.
  11. [11] Kinchin, I.M., Gravett, K., 2022. Dominant Discourses in Higher Education: Critical Perspectives, Cartographies and Practice. Bloomsbury Academic: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350180314
  12. [12] Taylor, M., 2018. Understanding Stories of Professional Formation during Early Childhood Education and Care Practice Placements. Irish Educational Studies. 37(2), 227–241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2018.1465838
  13. [13] Rabinow, P., 1984. Polemics, Politics, and Problemizations: An Interview with Michel Foucault. In The Foucault Reader. Pantheon Books: New York, NY, USA. pp. 381–390.
  14. [14] Cecchin, G., Lane, G., Ray, W.A., 1993. Irreverence: A Strategy for Therapists' Survival. Routledge: London, UK.
  15. [15] Foucault, M., 1986. The History of Sexuality, Vol. II: The Use of Pleasure. Vintage Books: New York, NY, USA.
  16. [16] Packer, M.J., 2018. The Science of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
  17. [17] Lee, M.-Y., Greene, G.J., 1999. A Social Constructivist Framework for Integrating Cross-Cultural Issues in Teaching Clinical Social Work. Journal of Social Work Education. 35(1), 21–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1999.10778944
  18. [18] Dallos, R., Vetere, A., 2021. Systemic Therapy and Attachment Narratives: Applications in a Range of Clinical Settings, 2nd ed. Routledge: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003080152
  19. [19] Kong, S.-T., Stepanova, E., Thanki, V., 2023. Collaborative Practice Research in Social Work: Piloting a Model for Research and Professional Learning during COVID-19. European Social Work Research. 1(1), 84–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/XPUV7930
  20. [20] Brown, J., 1997. Circular Questioning: An Introductory Guide. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy. 18(2), 109–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1467-8438.1997.tb00276.x
  21. [21] Social Work England, 2019. Professional Standards. Available from: https://www.socialworkengland.org.uk/standards/professional-standards/ (cited 20 December 2025).
  22. [22] Parker, J., 2025. Social Work Practice: Assessment, Planning, Intervention and Review. Learning Matters: London, UK.
  23. [23] British Association of Social Workers, 2018. Professional Capabilities Framework for Social Work in England Guidance on Using the 2018 Refreshed PCF. Available from: https://basw.co.uk/sites/default/files/2023-07/PCF%20Final%20Documents%20Overview%2011%20June%202018.pdf (cited 20 December 2025).
  24. [24] Land, R., Meyer, J.H.F., Baillie, C., 2010. Editors' Preface: Threshold Concepts and Transformational Learning. In Threshold Concepts and Transformational Learning. Sense Publishers: Rotterdam, The Netherlands. pp. ix–xlii.
  25. [25] Bower, M., 2004. Psychoanalytic Theories for Social Work Practice: Thinking under Fire. Routledge: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203341155_chapter_1
  26. [26] Barradell, S., 2013. The Identification of Threshold Concepts: A Review of Theoretical Complexities and Methodological Challenges. Higher Education. 65, 265–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9542-3
  27. [27] Clandinin, D.J., Huber, J., 2010. Narrative Inquiry. In: McGaw, B., Baker, E., Peterson, P.P. (Eds.). International Encyclopedia of Education, 3rd ed. Elsevier: New York, NY, USA. pp. 436–441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01387-7
  28. [28] Wang, C.C., Geale, S.K., 2015. The Power of Story: Narrative Inquiry as a Methodology in Nursing Research. International Journal of Nursing Sciences. 2(2), 195–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2015.04.014
  29. [29] Kwong, J.M., Fawson, P.R., 2022. Practitioner Wisdom: A Conceptual Approach. The British Journal of Social Work. 52(8), 4721–4737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcac086
  30. [30] Taylor, M., Folarin, E., Greenchester, A., 2023. The Impact on Two Practising Social Workers Who Taught Social Work Students in a University Setting. International Journal of Practice-Based Learning in Health and Social Care. 11(1), 92–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18552/ijpblhsc.v11i1.781
  31. [31] Moseley, A., Taylor, M., Wilson, S., et al., 2024. Reflections from Members of a Collaborative Social Work Practitioner-Academic Research Team. Critical and Radical Social Work. 12(3), 432–440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/20498608Y2024D000000027
  32. [32] Taylor, C.A., 2018. Edu-Crafting Posthumanist Adventures in/for Higher Education. Parallax. 24(3), 371–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2018.1496585
  33. [33] Bateson, G., 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA.
  34. [34] Deleuze, G., Guattari, F., 1994. What Is Philosophy? Verso Books: London, UK.
  35. [35] Banks, S., 2020. Ethics and Values in Social Work. Bloomsbury Academic: London, UK.
  36. [36] Thompson, N., 2020. Anti-Discriminatory Practice: Equality, Diversity and Social Justice. Bloomsbury Publishing: London, UK.
  37. [37] Kamel, H., 2024. Understanding the Impact of AI Hallucinations on the University Community. Cybrarians Journal. 73, 111–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70000/cj.2024.73.622
  38. [38] Molala, T.S., 2025. Social Work in the Digital Age: Towards Adopting Artificial Intelligence in Social Work. International Social Work. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00208728251383134
  39. [39] Taylor, M., James, S., 2023. How Social Work Managers Can Benefit from Teaching Social Work Students in a University. Irish Journal of Academic Practice. 11(1), 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21427/8R7P-FS57
  40. [40] Holzinger, A., Saranti, A., Angerschmid, A., et al., 2023. Toward Human-Level Concept Learning: Pattern Benchmarking for AI Algorithms. Patterns. 4(8), 100788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100788
  41. [41] Haarlammert, M., Birman, D., Oberoi, A., et al., 2017. Inside-Out: Representational Ethics and Diverse Communities. American Journal of Community Psychology. 60(3–4), 414–423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12188
  42. [42] Jude, J., 2018. The Practice of Systemic Reflexivity. Journal of Social Work Practice. 32(1), 45–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2017.1291499
  43. [43] Trevithick, P., 2008. Revisiting the Knowledge Base of Social Work: A Framework for Practice. British Journal of Social Work. 38(6), 1212–1237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm026
  44. [44] Memarian, B., Doleck, T., 2023. Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics (FATE) in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Higher Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 5, 100152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100152
  45. [45] Lan, H., 2025. Sustainable Development of Social Responsibility in Universities in the Digital Era. Information Development. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669241303124
  46. [46] Aubrey, K., Riley, A., 2022. Understanding and Using Educational Theories, 3rd ed. Sage: London, UK.
  47. [47] Simon, G., 2023. Reflexivity 3: Breaking Out of Reflexive Loops to Decolonise Practice. Murmurations: Journal of Transformative Systemic Practice. 6(2), 53–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28963/6.2.4
  48. [48] Bearman, M., Ryan, J., Ajjawi, R., 2023. Discourses of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Critical Literature Review. Higher Education. 86(2), 369–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00937-2
  49. [49] Loyens, S.M.M., Gijbels, D., 2008. Understanding the Effects of Constructivist Learning Environments: Introducing a Multi-Directional Approach. Instructional Science. 36(5), 351–357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9059-4
  50. [50] Segal, M., 2025. Confronting and Managing Ethical Dilemmas in Social Work Using ChatGPT. European Journal of Social Work. 28(1), 155–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2024.2377786
  51. [51] Lou-Barton, G., Davis, S.D., 2019. Systems Theory. In: Lebow, J., Chambers, A., Breunlin, D.C. (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 2894–2899. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_327
  52. [52] Sennett, R., 2019. Building and Dwelling: Ethics for the City. Penguin Books UK: London, UK.
  53. [53] Von Bertalanffy, L., 2017. The History and Status of General Systems Theory. Academy of Management Journal. 15(4), 407–426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/255139
  54. [54] St. Pierre, E.A., 2000. Poststructural Feminism in Education: An Overview. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 13(5), 477–515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390050156422
  55. [55] Nuwasiima, M., Ahonon, M.P., Kadiri, C., 2024. The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning in Social Work Practice. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 24(1), 80–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.24.1.2998
  56. [56] Walker, A.P., Banks, L., Gibbs, D.J., et al., 2025. Generative Artificial Intelligence Use among Social Work Students: The Role of Perceived Utility and Knowledge. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work. 23(1), 177–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2025.2596186
  57. [57] Barad, K., 2003. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 28(3), 801–831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
  58. [58] Reynolds, V., 2019. Justice-Doing at the Intersections of Power: Community Work, Therapy and Supervision. Dulwich Centre Publications: Adelaide, Australia.

How to Cite

Mark Taylor. Artificial Intelligence and Case-Based Learning in Social Work Education: Pedagogical Considerations and Future Directions. Journal of Education and Learning Environments. 21 April 2026. https://doi.org/10.55121/jele.v2i1.1050
Citation formats

Copyright & License

Copyright © 2026 Mark Taylor. Published by Japan Bilingual Publishing Co..

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Article Metrics

1,278Abstract views
663Downloads