Exploring ‘Complex Adaptive Assemblage’ in Urban Design: A Case Study of Rethinking Informal Vendor Activities around Dhaka New Market Shopping Complex

Authors

  • Md. Ekramullah Bhuian

    Department of Architecture, Primeasia University, Dhaka 1213, Bangladesh
  • Fahmida Nusrat *

    Department of Architecture, Primeasia University, Dhaka 1213, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55121/upc.v2i2.200

Keywords:

Urban Design, Complex Adaptive Assemblage, Urban Complexity, Assemblage Thinking, Urban Informality

Abstract

The subject matter of Urban Design has long been criticised for having no substantial basis to formulate a significant
groundwork of theoretical framework in general. Despite having the capability to formulate solutions in creative ways of thinking, Urban Design is subjected to further arguments regarding subject matters due to criticisms. While exploring this substantial amount of literature, this paper aims to put the process of urban design thinking into a hypothesis of the theoretical framework of “Complex Adaptive Assemblage”. In doing so, for more empirical purposes, a real-life scenario of informal vendor activities around a formal shopping complex in Dhaka city is chosen to explore the hypothesis. As a result, using the relevant understanding of the theoretical framework, a synergy is generated to analyze three design proposals aimed to accommodate informal vendor activities within the formal market area. An in-depth observation along with a pictorial survey has been conducted in three selected entry points of the retail premise that display the diverse agglomeration of the shoppers and vendors. The outcome discusses how the synergy works as a viable theoretical framework in the urban design thinking process. This theory-centric hypothetical urban design exercise for a real-life case study eventually has the potential to review the similar context of informal retail activities that is evident in many Global South countries.

References

[1] Boeing, G., 2018. Measuring the complexity of urban form and design. URBAN DESIGN International. 23(4), 281–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-018-0072-1

[2] Dovey, K., Pafka, E., 2016. The science of urban design? URBAN DESIGN International. 21, 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2015.28

[3] de Roo, G., 2018. Ordering principles in a dynamic world of change–on social complexity, transformation and the conditions for balancing purposeful interventions and spontaneous change. Progress in Planning. 125, 1–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2017.04.002

[4] Sengupta, U., Rauws, W.S., de Roo, G., 2023. Planning and complexity: Engaging with temporal dynamics, uncertainty and complex adaptive systems‬l. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 43, 970–974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813516675872 ‬

[5] Marshall, S., 2012. Planning, design and the complexity of cities. In: Portugali, J., Meyer, H., Stolk, E., et al. (eds.). Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age: An Overview with Implications to Urban Planning and Design. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany. pp. 191–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24544-2_11

[6] Kabir, A., Parolin, B., 2012. Planning and development of Dhaka–a story of 400 years. Proceedings of The 15th International Planning History Society Conference; 15–18 July 2012, Sao Paulo, Brazil. pp. 1–20.

[7] Israt, A.S., Adam, M., 2019. From control street to shared space: A study on the street hawking activities in the urban public spaces of Dhaka City. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 8, 1–14.

[8] Jacobs, J., 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House: New York, NY, USA.

[9] Christopher, A., 1965. A city is not a tree. Architectural Forum. 122(1), 58–62.

[10] Hussain, R., 2019. City, informality and poverty: The polarization of the street vendors in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Italian Sociologiacal Review. 9(3), 413–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13136/isr.v9i3.249

[11] Harris, R., 2018. Modes of informal urban development: A global phenomenon. Journal of Planning Literature. 33(3), 267–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412217737340

[12] Dovey, K., 2012. Informal urbanism and complex adaptive assemblage. International Development Planning Review. 34(4), 349–368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2012.23

[13] Earl, C., Eckert, C., Johnson, J., 2004. Complexity models in design. 2004. Proceedings of The International Design Conference - Design 2004; May 18–21, 2004; Dubrovnik, Croatia. pp. 163-168.

[14] Patil, A.P., Dongre, A.R., 2014. An approach for understanding encroachments in the urban environment based on complexity science. URBAN DESIGN International. 19(1), 50–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.12

[15] Bhowmik, S.K., 2005. Street vendors in Asia: A review. Economic and Political Weekly. 40(22–23), 2256–2264.

[16] Siegenfeld, A.F., Bar-Yam, Y., 2020. An introduction to complex systems science and its applications. Complexity. 2020, e6105872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6105872

[17] Sengupta, U., 2017. Complexity theory: The urban is a complex adaptive system. In: Iossifova, D., Doll, C. and Gasparatos, A. (eds.). Defining the Urban. Routledge, UK. p. 249.

[18] El Ghmari, S., Zabadi, A., 2021. Towards a new complex science of cities. African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences. 4(4), 606–620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48346/IMIST.PRSM/ajlp-gs.v4i4.26203

[19] Kamalipour, H., Peimani, N., 2015. Assemblage thinking and the city: Implications for urban studies. Current Urban Studies. 3(4), 402–408. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/cus.2015.34031

[20] Balmaceda, B., Fuentes, M., 2016. Cities and methods from complexity science. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity. 29(5), 1177–1186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-016-6084-2

[21] Batty, M., 2016. Complexity in city systems: Understanding, evolution, and design. Working paper no. 177, 7 March 2016.

[22] Boeing, G., 2018. Urban spatial order: Street network orientation. Applied Network Science. 6, 67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-019-0189-1

[23] Anderson, B., McFarlane, C., 2011. Assemblage and geography. Area. 43(2), 124–127.

[24] Dovey, K., Wood, S., 2015. Public/private urban interfaces: Type, adaptation, assemblage. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability. 8(1), 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2014.891151

[25] Madanipour, A., 2006. Roles and challenges of urban design. Journal of Urban Design. 11(2), 173–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800600644035

[26] Holubec, P., 2014. Assemblage thinking in urban studies: How to conceive of a city?. Advanced Engineering Forum. 12, 17–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.12.17

[27] Murray Li, T., 2007. Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and Society. 36(2), 263–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140701254308

[28] Durose, C., van Ostaijen, M., van Hulst, M., et al., 2022. Working the urban assemblage: A transnational study of transforming practices. Urban Studies. 59(10), 2129–2146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211031431

[29] Batty, M., 2012. Building a science of cities. Cities. 29, S9–S16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.008

[30] Verdinelli, S., Scagnoli, N.I., 2013. Data display in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 12(1), 359–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200117

[31] Kadir, S.A., Jamaludin, M., 2012. Applicability of Malaysian standards and universal design in public buildings in Putrajaya. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 36, 659–669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.072

[32] Hossain, N., 2014. Socio-spatial dialectic of retail environment in developing countries: Perception of retail trends in Dhaka. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences. 2(4), 10–21.

[33] Rahman, T., 2021. Significance of onserving the Dhaka New Market [Bachelor’s theis]. Savar, Bangladesh: Jahangirnagar University.

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (November 2024)

Section

Article