Topic Management in Chinese L2 Natural Conversations

Authors

  • Yiyuan Hou

    Research Center for Language and Language Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

  • Shuangyun Yao *

    Research Center for Language and Language Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55121/le.v2i2.461

Keywords:

Topic Management, Interactional Practices, L2 Interactional Competence, Natural Conversation, Conversation Analysis

Abstract

Topic management plays a crucial role in the smooth and coherent flow of natural conversations, particularly in second language (L2) interactions where learners must navigate not only linguistic forms but also complex interactional structures. This study examines the interactional practices and sequential structures deployed by Chinese L2 learners across three proficiency levels to initiate, develop, change, and close a topic in informal occurring conversation. Drawing on the methodology of Conversation Analysis (CA), the research focuses on how learners utilize specific linguistic and interactional resources—such as preliminary actions, the [formulation + confirmation-seeking marker] format, and content-marked closures—to manage topic progressivity and mark topic boundaries. Findings reveal systematic differences in the frequency, complexity, and sequential placement of these practices across proficiency levels. Higher-level learners demonstrate a greater ability to collaboratively sustain topic development, prepare for disjunctive transitions, and manage topic closures with nuanced, recipient-oriented strategies. In contrast, low-level learners tend to adopt more direct, speaker-centered approaches. These interactional differences reflect varying degrees of L2 interactional competence and point to the developmental nature of topic management skills. The study offers pedagogical implications by identifying teachable practices that contribute to conversational coherence and social alignment. It also contributes to our understanding of how L2 learners mobilize familiar linguistic resources more sophisticatedly to fulfill interactional goals.

References

[1] Hellermann, J., 2007. The Development of Practices for Action in Classroom Dyadic Interaction: Focus on Task Openings. The Modern Language Journal. 91(1), 83–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00503.x

[2] Hellermann, J., 2008. Social Actions for Classroom Language Learning. Multilingual Matters: Bristol, UK. pp.41–82.

[3] Doehler, S.P., Pochon-Berger, E., 2011. Chapter 9. Developing ‘Methods’ for Interaction: A Cross-Sectional Study of Disagreement Sequences in French L2. In: Hall, J., Hellermann, J., Pekarek Doehler, S. (eds.). L2 Interactional Competence and Development. Multilingual Matters: Bristol, UK. pp. 206–243.

[4] Walsh, S., 2011. Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–256.

[5] Doehler, S.P., Pochon-Berger, E., 2015. The Development of L2 Interactional Competence: Evidence from Turn-taking Organization, Sequence Organization, Repair Organization and Preference Organization. In: Cadierno, T., Eskildsen, S. (eds.). Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning. De Gruyter Mouton: Berlin, Germany. pp. 233–268.

[6] Galaczi, E.D., 2008. Peer–Peer Interaction in a Speaking Test: The Case of the First Certificate in English Examination. Language Assessment Quarterly. 5(2), 89–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300801934702

[7] Galaczi, E.D., 2014. Interactional Competence across Proficiency Levels: How do Learners Manage Interaction in Paired Speaking Tests? Applied Linguistics. 35(5), 553–574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt017

[8] Barron, A., Black, E., 2015. Constructing Small Talk in Learner-native Speaker Voice-based Telecollaboration: A Focus on Topic Management and Backchanneling. System. 48, 112–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.009

[9] Abe, M., Roever, C., 2019. Interactional Competence in L2 Text-chat Interactions: First-idea Proffering in Task Openings. Journal of Pragmatics. 144, 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.03.001

[10] Abe, M., Roever, C., 2020. Task Closings in L2 Text-Chat Interactions: A Study of L2 Interactional Competence. CALICO Journal. 37(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.38562

[11] Abe, M., 2023. Topic Management in L2 Task-based Written Interactions. Language Learning & Technology. 27(1), 1–18.

[12] Pekarek Doehler, S., Berger, E., 2018. L2 Interactional Competence as Increased Ability for Context-sensitive Conduct: A Longitudinal Study of Story-openings. Applied Linguistics. 39(4), 555–578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw021

[13] Morris-Adams, M., 2016. Negotiating Topic Changes: Native and Non-native Speakers of English in Conversation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 26(3), 366–383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12134

[14] Couper-Kuhlen, E., Selting, M., 2018. Interactional Linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp.312–328.

[15] Sacks, H., 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Basil Blackwell: Oxford, UK. pp. 752–763.

[16] Button, G., Casey, N., 1985. Structures of Social Action: Generating topic: the use of topic initial elicitors. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Generating-topic%3A-the-use-of-topic-initial-Button-Casey/54cbc6061ad3d73e1eff913280121cffcc28c994 (cited 28 May 2025).

[17] Jefferson, G., 1984. Notes on A Systematic Deployment of the Acknowledgement Tokens “Yeah”; and “Mm Hm”. Paper in Linguistics. 17(2), 197–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818409389201

[18] Beach, W.A., 1993. Transitional Regularities for ‘casual’ “Okay” Usages. Journal of Pragmatics. 19(4), 325–352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90092-4

[19] Stokoe, E.H., 2000. Constructing Topicality in University Students’ Small-group Discussion: A Conversation Analytic Approach. Language and Education. 14(3), 184–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780008666789

[20] Clift, R., 2001. Meaning in Interaction: The Case of Actually. Language. 77(2), 245–291.

[21] Schegloff, E.A., 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. 1, 1–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208

[22] Bolden, G.B., 2008. “So What’s Up?”: Using the Discourse Marker So to Launch Conversational Business. Research on Language and Social Interaction. 41(3), 302–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802237909

[23] Holt, E., 2010. The last laugh: Shared Laughter and Topic Termination. Journal of Pragmatics. 42(6), 1513–1525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.011

[24] Hellermann, J., Cole, E., 2009. Practices for Social Interaction in the Language-Learning Classroom: Disengagements from Dyadic Task Interaction. Applied Linguistics. 30(2), 186–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn032

[25] Seedhouse, P., Supakorn, S., 2015. Topic-as-script and Topic-as-action in Language Assessment and Teaching. Applied Linguistics Review. 6(3), 393–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2015-0018

[26] Dolce, F.M., van Compernolle, R.A., 2020. Topic Management and Student Initiation in An Advanced Chinese-as-a-foreign-language Classroom. Classroom Discourse. 11(1), 80–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1563799

[27] Markee, N., 2005. The Organization of Off-task Talk in Second Language Classrooms. In: Richards, K., Seedhouse, P. (eds.). Applying Conversation Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK. pp. 197–213.

[28] Kasper, G., 2004. Participant Orientations in German Conversation-for-Learning. The Modern Language Journal. 88(4), 551–567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-18-.x

[29] Markman, K.M., 2009. “So What Shall We Talk About”: Openings and Closings in Chat-Based Virtual Meetings. The Journal of Business Communication (1973). 46(1), 150–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943608325751

[30] Gonzales, A., 2013. Chapter 5. Development of Politeness Strategies in Participatory Online Environments: A case study. In: Taguchi, N., Sykes, J.M. (eds.). Technology in Interlanguage Pragmatics Research and Teaching. John Benjamins: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 101–120.

[31] Wong, J., 2005. Sidestepping Grammar. In: Richards, K., Seedhouse, P. (eds.). Applying Conversation Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK. pp. 159–173.

[32] Barraja-Rohan, A.-M., 2003. Past Troubles-talk in Nonnative-native Interviews. Journal of Pragmatics. 35(4), 615–629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00126-1

[33] Cutrone, P., 2005. A Case Study Examining Backchannels in Conversations Between Japanese–British Dyads. Multilingua. 24(3), 237–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2005.24.3.237

[34] Cook, V., 1999. Going Beyond the Native Speaker in Language Teaching. TESOL Quarterly. 33(2), 185–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587717

[35] Nakamura, I., 2008. Understanding How Teacher and Student Talk with Each Other: An Exploration of How ‘repair’ Displays the Co-management of Talk-in-interaction. Language Teaching Research. 12(2), 265–283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807086295

[36] Svennevig, J., 1999. Getting Acquainted in Conversation. John Benjamins: Amsterdam, Netherlands. p.143.

[37] Tryggvason, M.-T., 2004. Comparison of Topic Organization in Finnish, Swedish-Finnish, and Swedish Family Discourse. Discourse Processes. 37(3), 225–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3703_3

[38] Sacks,H., Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G., 1974. A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation. Language. 50(4), 696–735.

[39] Sidnell, J., Stivers, T., 2013. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA. p. 79.

[40] Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., 2011. A System for Transcribing Talk-in-interaction: GAT 2. Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift Zur Verbalen Interaktion. 12, 1–51.

[41] Yue, Y., 2020. A Chinese Conversational Discourse Approach to the Extended Uses of nage. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies. 1, 48–61.

[42] Shen, W., 2020. Evolution of the Chinese Connective suoyi. Chinese Linguistics. 2, 38–43.

[43] Yu, G.D., 2022. Ai as a Topic Transition Signal in Mandarin Conversations. Journal of foreign language. 45(2), 61–71, 92.

[44] Bolden, G.B., 2006. Little Words That Matter: Discourse Markers “So” and “Oh” and the Doing of Other-Attentiveness in Social Interaction. Journal of Communication. 56(4), 661–688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00314.x

[45] Planalp, S., Tracy, K., 1980. Not to Change the Topic But …: A Cognitive Approach to the Management of Conversation. Annals of the International Communication Association. 4(1), 237–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1980.11923805

[46] Shen, Q., Yao, S., 2022. Syntactically Incomplete Turns as Delicate Actions - A Way to Manage Interpersonal Relationships. Journal of Pragmatics. 197, 27–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.05.007

[47] Liu, H., Tian, M., Yao, S., 2024. The Chinese Change-of-state Token o in Responsive Units. Lingua. 310, 103779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103779

[48] Tao, H., 2020. An Interactive Perspective on Topic Constructions in Mandarin: Some New Findings Based on Natural Conversation. In: Huang, C.-R., Lin, Y.-H., Chen, I.-H., Hsu, Y.-Y. (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Chinese Linguistics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 635–668.

[49] Yao, S., Liu, H., 2020. Topic Construction in Natural Spoken Chinese. Contemporary Rhetoric. 6, 62–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16027/j.cnki.cn31-2043/h.2020.06.007

[50] Heritage, J., 1984. A Change-of-state Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement. In: Atkinson, J.M., (eds.). Structures of Social Action. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 299–345.

[51] Tian, M., Yao, S., 2020. The Interactional Function of Duiba in Chinese Conversation. Chinese Language Learning. 3, 46–55.

[52] Yao, S., Tian, M., 2020. The Interactional Function of Shiba and its Epistemic Status in Chinese Daily Conversation. Language teaching and linguistic studies. 6, 47–59.

[53] Heritage, J., Watson, R., 1979. Formulations as Conversational Objects. In: Psathas, G. (eds.). Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. Irvington Press: New York, NY, USA. pp. 123–162.

[54] Deppermann, A., 2011. The Study of Formulations as a Key to an Interactional Semantics. Human Studies. 34(2), 115–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-011-9187-8

[55] Maynard, D.W., 1980. Placement of Topic Changes in Conversation. Semiotica. 30(3–4), 263–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1980.30.3-4.263

[56] Geluykens, R., 1993. Topic Introduction in English Conversation. Transactions of the Philological Society. 91(2), 181–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1993.tb01068.x

[57] Stewart, S., 1997. The Many Faces of Conversational Laughter. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED404859.pdf (cited 28 May 2025).

[58] Zhang, Y., Fang, M., 2023. A Study on Topic: From the Perspective of Syntactic Collaborative Construction in Mandarin Conversation. Chinese Linguistics. 2, 19–31.

[59] Schegloff, E.A., Sacks, H., 1973. Opening up Closings. Semiotica. 8(4), 289–327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289

[60] Tannen, D., 2005. Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. p. 94.

[61] Liddicoat, A.J., 2007. An Introduction to Conversation Analysis. Bloomsbury: London, UK. pp. 259–263.

[62] Drew, P., Holt, E., 1998. Figures of Speech: Figurative Expressions and the Management of Topic Transition in Conversation. Language in Society. 27(4), 495–522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500020200

[63] König, C., 2013. Topic Management in French L2: A Longitudinal Conversation Analytic Study. EUROSLA Yearbook. 13(1), 226–250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.13.11kon

[64] Taguchi, N., Roever, C., 2017. Second Language Pragmatics. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. pp. 208–226.

[65] Seedhouse, P., 2019. The Dual Personality of ‘Topic’ in the IELTS Speaking Test. ELT Journal. 73(3), 247–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccz009

[66] Hırçın-Çoban, M., Sert, O., 2020. Resolving Interactional Troubles and Maintaining Progressivity in Paired Speaking Assessment in an EFL Context. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment. 9(1), 64–94.

Downloads

How to Cite

Hou, Y., & Yao, S. (2025). Topic Management in Chinese L2 Natural Conversations. Linguistic Exploration, 2(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.55121/le.v2i2.461

Issue

Section

Articles