Dynamic Assessment of Tunnels Subjected to Moving Train Loads (Case Study: Tunnel of Tehran Subway Line 3)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55121/tdr.v2i2.252Keywords:
Dynamic Loading, Train Dynamic Load, Numerical Modeling, Dynamic Analysis of Tunnels, Finite Difference MethodAbstract
The expansion of urban populations necessitates improvements in construction and the development of urban infrastructure. The creation of subway tunnels in urban centers has consistently faced considerable challenges and constraints. This study specifically focuses on one such issue: the intersection of subway lines with existing railway lines. The main aim of this research is to model the dynamic load imposed by a moving train on a section of the Tehran Metro Line 3 tunnel as it passes beneath the Tehran-Ahvaz intercity railway. To accomplish this, the dynamic load generated by the train’s movement is simulated, and a corresponding function for this load is derived. This function is subsequently incorporated into a numerical model of the tunnel, which is developed using the Finite Difference Method (FDM). Given that the tunnel is situated within soil, the environment surrounding it is regarded as a continuous equivalent medium. The results of this modeling are then compared with two analytical approaches. The comparison demonstrates a strong correlation between the results, thereby validating the accuracy of the findings from the computational model. Additionally, by assessing the most critical operational conditions for trains on the Tehran-Ahvaz railway, a safety factor of 2.34 is established, indicating the design’s robustness under the specified conditions.
References
[1] Zhang, K., Xie, H., Guo, W., et al., 2023. Experimental study on dynamic response of rock tunnel subjected to train moving load. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources. 9(1), 125.
[2] Zhang, Z.X., Yang, J.Y., Pan, W.B., et al., 2024. Tunnel-Ground Interaction Modelling in Jointed Stratified Rock Masses Under Long-Term High-Speed Train Loading. Proceedings of The ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium; June 23–26, 2024; Golden, CO, USA. pp. 1–9.
[3] Li, L., Cheng, L., Liu, W., et al., 2024. Train-induced response of stiffness-degraded tunnel linings. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 148, 105739.
[4] Li, W., Gu, Y., Zhao, W., et al., 2024. Aerodynamic study of high-speed railway tunnels with variable cross section utilizing equivalent excavation volume. Physics of Fluids. 36(7), 076120.
[5] Tehran Urban and Suburban Railway Company (Metro), 2011. Details methods of primary structures subway tunnel line 3 passing under the railway.
[6] Grossmann, C., 2007. Numerical Treatment of Partial Differential Equations. Springer: Cham, Switzerland.
[7] Hou, G., Chen, C., Qin, S., et al., 2024. Difference scheme. Engineering Applications of Computational Methods. 20, 3–16.
[8] Yağmurlu, M., Gagir, A., 2022. A finite difference approximation for numerical simulation of 2D viscous coupled burgers equations. Mathematical Sciences and Applications E-Notes. 10(3), 146–158.
[9] Afridi, M.I., Khan, M.S., Zhang, Y., et al., 2024. Numerical simulation of Darcy–Brinkman oscillatory flow of dissipative fluid: Utilization of finite difference method. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals. 85, 1–16.
[10] Shlager, K.L., Schneider, J.B., 1995. A selective survey of the finite-difference time-domain literature. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine. 37(4), 39–57.
[11] Gorbacheva, Yu.N., Polevikov, V.K., 2023. A variational-difference method for numerical simulation of equilibrium capillary surfaces. Informatika. 20(4), 56–68. (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.37661/1816-0301-2023-20-4-56-68
[12] Yang, J., Li, Q., Zhu, S., et al., 2024. Train-track-circular tunnel spatially coupled dynamics model and coupling effects of dynamic track-tunnel interactions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2647(15), 152005.
[13] Vataev, A.S., Vatulin, Ya.S., Kavkazsky, V.N., 2023. Simulation of the dynamic impact of high-speed rolling stock on buried structures of the tunnel type. World of Transport and Transportation. 21(6), 72–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30932/1992-3252-2023-21-6-9
[14] Liu, L., Soper, D., 2024. Numerical Modelling of Partially Loaded Freight Train Entering a Tunnel. Proceedings of The Sixth International Conference on Railway Technology: Research, Development and Maintenance; September 1–5, 2024; Prague, Czech. pp. 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4203/ccc.7.3.7
[15] Zhang, Z., Feng, J., Gou, K., et al., 2023. Experimental and numerical evaluation for tunnel structural stability of fiber concrete lining with different crack features under train load. Engineering Failure Analysis. 1(153), 107530.
[16] Szurgott, P., Kozera, D., 2012. Modernization of the KNI 140070 viaduct and its influence on dynamic response under selected high speed train. Journal of KONES. 19(4), 615–624.
[17] Li, H., Wu, G., 2020. Fatigue evaluation of steel bridge details integrating multi-scale dynamic analysis of coupled train-track-bridge system and fracture mechanics. Applied Sciences. 10(9), 3261.
[18] Erduran, E., Gonen, S., Alkanany, A., 2024. Parametric analysis of the dynamic response of railway bridges due to vibrations induced by heavy-haul trains. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering. 20(3), 326–339.
[19] Yuan, P., Dong, Y., Frangopol, D.M., 2022. Reliability Assessment of Railway Bridges under High-Speed Traffic by Considering the track Quality and the System Randomness. Proceedings of The Bridge Safety, Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle, Resilience and Sustainability; Jun 11–15, 2022; Barcelona, Spain. pp. 108–116.
[20] Kim, S.W., Yun, D.W., Chang, S.J., et al., 2022. Dynamic stability assessment of high-speed railway bridges using numerical model updating. Applied Sciences. 12(8), 3948.
[21] Bettinelli, L., Stollwitzer, A., Fink, J., 2023. Numerical study on the influence of coupling beam modeling on structural accelerations during high-speed train crossings. Applied Sciences. 13(15), 8746.
[22] Ayubirad, M.S., Ataei, S., Tajali, M., 2024. Numerical model updating and validation of a truss railway bridge considering train‐track‐bridge interaction dynamics. Shock and Vibration. 2024(1), 4469500.
[23] Tan, S., Ke, X., Pang, Z., et al., 2024. Dynamic Response Prediction of Railway Bridges Considering Train Load Duration Using the Deep LSTM Network. Applied Sciences. 14(20), 9161.
[24] Liu, H., Wang, Y., Zhou, R., et al., 2024. Refined dynamic analysis of three slab tracks on bridge structures under various high-speed train loads. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control. 43(4), 1437–1455.
[25] König, P., Salcher, P., Adam, C., et al., 2021. Dynamic analysis of railway bridges exposed to high-speed trains considering the vehicle–track–bridge–soil interaction. Acta Mechanica. 232, 4583–4608.
[26] Zeng, Q., Dimitrakopoulos, E.G., Lo, C.H., 2015. Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulation of the Dynamic Interaction between High-Speed Trains and a Steel-Truss Arch Bridge. Proceedings of The 2015 World Congress on Advances in Structural Engineering and Mechanics (ASEM15); August 25–29, 2015; Incheon, Republic of Korea.
[27] Zhu, Z., Zhou, G., Zheng, W., et al., 2024. Running safety assessment method of trains under seismic conditions based on the derailment risk domain. Railway Engineering Science. 32(4), 499–517.
[28] Ahmadi, M., 2007. Numerical Analysis of Piles under Lateral Load in Clay Soil. Proceedings of The 7th International Congress of Civil Engineering; June 9, 2007; Tehran, Iran.
[29] Walter, H., 2003. Design of the Shotcrete Tunnel Lining of a Metro Station–Safety Considerations. Proceedings of The Euro-C Conference; (25-July, 2003); St. Johann im Pongau, Austria.
[30] Shokrieh, M.M., Heidarirarani, M., 2009. Comparison of concrete slabs behavior reinforced with steel rebars and FRP pultruded grating. Iran Soc Steel Struct. 5, 18–27.
[31] Hallaji, M., 2011. Investigating the Problems Finite Element Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Slab. Proceedings of The Second National Conference on Concrete; July 25, 2011; Tehran, Iran.
[32] Rashid, S., Parametric Study of Bridge Response to High Speed Trains, Ballasted Track on Concrete Bridges [Master’s thesis]. KTH Royal Institute of Technology: Stockholm, Sweden.
[33] Yang, Y.B., Yau, J.D., Wu, Y.S., 2011. Vehicle-Bridge Interaction Dynamics: With Application to High-Speed Railways. World Scientific: Singapore.
[34] Nejati, H.R., 2009. Dynamic analysis of Railway Tunnels based on In-Situ and laboratory Test Data [Master’s thesis]. Tarbiat Modares University: Tehran, Iran.
[35] Bian, X., Jiang, H., Cheng, C., et al., 2014. Full-scale model testing on a ballastless high-speed railway under simulated train moving loads. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 66, 368–384.
[36] Shooshpasha, I., Sharafkhah, M., 2014. The analytical and experimental study on the settlement of cast‐in‐situ concrete piles in sand. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering. 43(4), 35–45.