Dynamic Evaluation of Bridges: A Case Study of the Chenab Bridge in India

Authors

  • Anshul Jain *

    Department of Civil Engineering, Sagar Institute of Research & Technology, Bhopal 462041, India
  • Dr. Samir Patel

    Department of Civil Engineering, Indus University, Ahmedabad 382115, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55121/tdr.v3i1.541

Keywords:

Chenab Bridge, Dynamic Evaluation , Railway Bridge, Seismic Analysis , Wind Response, Structural Health Monitoring, Finite Element Analysis, Arch Bridge

Abstract

The Chenab Bridge, located in Jammu and Kashmir, India, is the world’s highest railway arch bridge, standing 359 meters above the Chenab River with a main arch span of 467 meters. This paper presents a comprehensive dynamic evaluation of the bridge, focusing on its response to seismic, wind, and blast loads, which are critical given its location in a seismically active and windy Himalayan region. The study employs advanced numerical modeling, field measurements, and structural health monitoring (SHM) data to assess the bridge’s dynamic behavior. Finite element analysis (FEA) and wind tunnel tests are utilized to evaluate modal properties, dynamic amplification factors, and structural stability under extreme environmental conditions. Results indicate that the bridge’s steel arch design, coupled with its robust foundation system, effectively mitigates dynamic excitations, ensuring safety for rail operations at speeds up to 100 km/h. The paper highlights the importance of integrating real-time monitoring systems for long-term performance assessment and provides insights into the design and evaluation of high-altitude bridges in challenging terrains. This paper explores the Chenab Bridge, the world’s highest railway bridge in Jammu and Kashmir, India. It examines its innovative engineering, construction challenges, and socio-economic impact. The study highlights its role in regional connectivity and infrastructure development, offering insights into sustainable design and future railway expansion in challenging terrains.

References

[1] Ahmed, G. H., & Aziz, O. Q. (2020). Stresses, deformations and damages of various joints in precast concrete segmental box girder bridges subjected to direct shear loading. Engineering Structures, 206, 110151.

[2] WSP, 2025. Chenab Bridge. Available from: https://www.wsp.com/en-in/projects/chenab-bridge (cited 02 January 2025).

[3] Al-Azzawi, Z., Stratford, T., Rotter, M., & Bisby, L. (2019). FRP strengthening of web panels of steel plate girders against shear buckling. Part-II: Fatigue study and cyclic series of tests. Composite Structures, 210, 82-95.

[4] Alexander, M., & Beushausen, H. (2019). Durability, service life prediction, and modelling for reinforced concrete structures–review and critique. Cement and Concrete Research, 122, 17-29.

[5] Al-Kaseasbeh, Q., & Mamaghani, I. H. (2019). Buckling strength and ductility evaluation of thin-walled steel stiffened square box columns with uniform and graded thickness under cyclic loading. Engineering Structures, 186, 498-507.

[6] Ataei, A., Zeynalian, M., & Yazdi, Y. (2019). Cyclic behaviour of bolted shear connectors in steel-concrete composite beams. Engineering Structures, 198, 109455.

[7] Bai, L., Shen, R., Zhang, X., & Wang, L. (2019). In-plane stability of self-anchored suspension bridge. J Jilin Univ (Engineering and Technology Edition), 49(05), 1500-1508.

[8] Balkos, K. D., Sjaarda, M., West, J. S., & Walbridge, S. (2019). Static and fatigue tests of steel-precast composite beam specimens with through-bolt shear connectors. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 24(5), 04019036.

[9] Balomenos, G. P., Kameshwar, S., & Padgett, J. E. (2020). Parameterized fragility models for multi-bridge classes subjected to hurricane loads. Engineering Structures, 208, 110213.

[10] Beneberu, E., & Yazdani, N. (2019). Residual strength of CFRP strengthened prestressed concrete bridge girders after hydrocarbon fire exposure. Engineering Structures, 184, 1-14.

[11] Bonopera, M., Chang, K. C., Chen, C. C., Lee, Z. K., Sung, Y. C., & Tullini, N. (2019). Fiber Bragg grating–differential settlement measurement system for bridge displacement monitoring: Case study. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 24(10), 05019011.

[12] Jain, A., Babu, K.A., 2025. Reviewing the green building concepts along with the applications of AI and IoT for environmental monitoring and designing sustainable infrastructures. Journal of Informatics and Mathematical Sciences. 17(1), 123–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26713/jims.v17i1.3056

[13] Cai, Z. K., Wang, Z., & Yang, T. Y. (2019). Cyclic load tests on precast segmental bridge columns with both steel and basalt FRP reinforcement. Journal of Composites for Construction, 23(3), 04019014.

[14] Cheng, J., Xu, M., & Xu, H. (2019). Mechanical performance study and parametric analysis of three-tower four-span suspension bridges with steel truss girders. Steel and Composite Structures, An International Journal, 32(2), 189-198.

[15] Cui, C., Zhang, Q., Bao, Y., Bu, Y., & Luo, Y. (2019). Fatigue life evaluation of welded joints in steel bridge considering residual stress. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 153, 509-518.

[16] Deng, Y., Guo, Q., & Xu, L. (2019). Effects of pounding and fluid–structure interaction on seismic response of long-span deep-water bridge with high hollow piers. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 44(5), 4453-4465.

[17] He, X. H., Fang, D. X., Li, H., & Shi, K. (2019). Parameter optimization for improved aerodynamic performance of louver-type wind barrier for train-bridge system. Journal of Central South University, 26(1), 229-240.

[18] Viuff, T., Xiang, X., Leira, B. J., & Øiseth, O. (2020). Software-to-software comparison of end-anchored floating bridge global analysis. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 25(5), 04020022.

[19] Xiang, X., & Løken, A. (2019, June). Hydroelastic analysis and validation of an end-anchored floating bridge under wave and current loads. In International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (Vol. 58882, p. V009T12A018). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

[20] An, Y., Chatzi, E., Sim, S.H., et al., 2019. Recent progress and future trends on damage identification methods for bridge structures. Structural Control and Health Monitoring. 26(10), e2416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2416

[21] Jain, A., Babu, K.A., 2024. Application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the lifecycle of sustainable buildings: An exhaustive literature review. Journal of Informatics and Mathematical Sciences. 16(1), 97–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26713/jims.v16i1.2947

[22] Dayan, V., Chileshe, N., Hassanli, R., 2022. A scoping review of information-modeling development in bridge management systems. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 148(9), 03122006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002340

[23] Zhao, R., Yuan, Y., Wei, X., et al., 2020. Review of annual progress of bridge engineering in 2019. Advances in Bridge Engineering. 1, 1–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251-020-00011-w

[24] Chenab Rail Bridge. Available from: https://chenabrailbridge.com/

[25] SOFiSTiK, 2015. Chenab Bridge — Jammu & Kashmir, India. Available from: https://www.sofistik.com/en/references/chenab-bridge (cited 03 January 2025).

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (May 2025): In Progress

Section

Article