Humor Construction through Metaphor in a Stand-Up Comedy under Conceptual Blending Theory: A Case Study of The King of Comedy
Authors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55121/le.v3i1.1194Abstract
Humor is essential in daily life and as linguistic research advances, its mechanisms have attracted increasing scholarly attention. Metaphor as a fundamental way humans conceptualize the world plays a key role in constructing humor. And stand-up comedy, combining verbal artistry with social critique, offers rich naturalistic data for linguistic analysis. To better understand how humor can be constructed through metaphor, this study analyzes the Chinese stand-up comedy program The King of Comedy, using Conceptual Blending Theory (CBT) as the analytical framework. The research aims to investigate how different types of metaphorical blending networks generate humor and to further explore the reasons behind the differences. Through a qualitative analysis of metaphorical humor drawn from the "pure performance" versions of the first three episodes, the study identifies four types of metaphorical blends: simplex networks, mirror networks, single-scope networks, and double-scope networks. The findings reveal that these networks construct humor through role reassignment, structural parallelism, frame dominance, and deep conceptual integration. Moreover, the study argues that the differences in humor construction paths can be attributed to two key factors: the depth of conceptual blending and the emergence of novel structures within the blended mental spaces. By illuminating the cognitive processes behind metaphorical humor, this study not only contributes to a more nuanced understanding of humor construction but also extends the application of CBT to the field of discourse analysis, particularly within the context of live stand-up comedy performances.
Keywords
Humor, Metaphor, Conceptual Blending Theory, Stand-Up Comedy, The King of ComedyReferences
[1] Koester, A., 2010. Workplace Discourse. Continuum: London, UK.
[2] Tannen, D., 1984. Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA.
[3] Lakoff, G., Johnson, M., 1980. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA.
[4] Zhao, B., 2023. Blind spot of civilization: Disability humor in stand-up comedy. Disability Research. 2, 33–42. (in Chinese)
[5] Suls, J.M., 1972. A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons. In: Goldstein, J.H., McGhee, P.E. (Eds.). The Psychology of Humor: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues. Academic Press: New York, NY, USA. pp. 81–100.
[6] Raskin, V., 1985. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. D. Reidel Publishing Company: Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
[7] Coulson, S., 2001. Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
[8] Hu, X., 2009. Analysis of Verbal Humor in Chinese Crosstalk from the Perspective of Conceptual Blending Theory. Shanghai International Studies University: Shanghai, China. (in Chinese)
[9] Wang, J., 2015. A Conceptual Blending Analysis of Metaphorical Humor in Talk Shows. Zhejiang University: Hangzhou, China. (in Chinese)
[10] Wang, J., 2002. On the Characteristics and Techniques of Humorous Language. Foreign Language Research. 3, 58–63. (in Chinese)
[11] Deng, Z., 2025. From engagement to stance shifting: A functional linguistic account of power deconstruction in workplace-themed stand-up comedy. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation. 8(12), 122–133.
[12] He, L., Chen, R., Dong, M., 2023. Humorous mockery: How to amuse and be polite at the same time. Journal of Pragmatics. 211, 31–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.04.007
[13] Holmes, J., 2000. Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies. 2(2), 159–185.
[14] Xu, T., Liu, M., Wang, X., 2023. How humor is experienced: An embodied metaphor account. Current Psychology. 42(20), 16674–16686.
[15] Gilbert, J.R., 2004. Performing Marginality: Humor, Gender, and Cultural Critique. Wayne State University Press: Detroit, MI, USA.
[16] Simile, O., 2025. A Linguistic Analysis of Humour in Selected Tanzanian Stand-Up Comedy Shows: A Script-Based Semantic Approach. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 14(1), 8.
[17] Greengross, G., Silvia, P.J., Nusbaum, E.C., 2020. Sex differences in humor production ability: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality. 84, 103886. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103886
[18] Plessen, C.Y., Franken, F.R., Ster, C., et al., 2020. Humor styles and personality: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the relations between humor styles and the Big Five personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences. 154, 109676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109676
[19] Weaver, S., Lockyer, S., 2025. Intersectionality and the Construction of Humour in Contemporary Stand-Up Comedy. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 28(6), 1551–1569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494241294156
[20] Attardo, S., 1994. Linguistic Theories of Humor. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany.
[21] Grady, J., Oakley, T., Coulson, S., 1999. Blending and metaphor. In: Steen, G., Gibbs, R. (Eds.). Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. John Benjamins: Havertown, PA, USA.
[22] Mintz, L.E., 1985. Standup Comedy as Social and Cultural Mediation. American Quarterly. 37(1), 71–80.
[23] Evans, V., Green, M., 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, UK.
[24] Fauconnier, G., 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
[25] Fauconnier, G., Turner, M., 1998. Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science. 22(2), 133–187.
[26] Fauconnier, G., Turner, M., 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. Basic Books: New York, NY, USA.
[27] Berber Sardinha, T., 2006. Collocation lists as instruments for metaphor detection in corpora. DELTA. 22(2), 249–274.
[28] Mason, Z.J., 2004. CorMet: A computational, corpus-based conventional metaphor extraction system. Computational Linguistics. 30(1), 23–44.
[29] Pragglejaz Group, 2007. MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol. 22(1), 1–39.
[30] Liu, X., 2024. Cognitive Mechanism of Verbal Humor Effectuated by Dialogic Resonance: A Conceptual Blending and Setup-Incongruity-Resolution Approach. Journal of Sichuan International Studies University. 40(3), 41–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-6414.2024.03.003 (in Chinese)
[31] Steen, G.J., Dorst, A.G., Herrmann, J.B., et al., 2010. A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
[32] Gaskins, D., Falcone, M., Rundblad, G., 2024. A usage-based approach to metaphor identification and analysis in child speech. Language and Cognition. 16(1), 32–56.
[33] Phan, V.H., Ho-Trinh, Q.T., 2023. A cognitive investigation into the love-life relationship expressed in poetry. Metaphor and Symbol. 38(2), 174–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2022.2058398
[34] Peng, Z., Yu, Y., Tay, D., 2023. COVID-19 as WATER? The functions of WATER metaphors in the metaphorical representation of COVID-19. PLoS ONE. 18(11), e0292806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292806
[35] Nahi, K.A., 2025. The Role of Conceptual Blending in Cognitive Metaphor and Humor. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture. 9.1, 17–39.
[36] Colston, H.L., Katz, A.N., 2004. Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences, 1st ed. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611628
[37] Coulson, S., Oakley, T., 2000. Blending Basics. Cognitive Linguistics. 11(3–4), 175–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.014
[38] Fauconnier, G., Turner, M., 2000. Compression and global insight. Cognitive Linguistics. 11(3–4), 283–304.
[39] Xu, Y., 2025. A Study on the Semantic Cognitive Mechanisms of Internet Meme Usage under Conceptual Blending Theory. Modern Linguistics. 13(7), 372–378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2025.137721 (in Chinese)
[40] Brandt, L., Brandt, P.A., 2005. Making Sense of a Blend: A Cognitive-Semiotic Approach to Metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics. 3(1), 216–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.3.12bra
[41] Krasikova, E.A., Korovina, S.G., 2025. Cognitive Models of Humor in Anecdotal Discourse: Based on the Chinese Language. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics. 16(4), 1121–1143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2025-16-4-1121-1143
Downloads
How to Cite
Copyright & License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lian Liu, Hui Chen, Honggang Liu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submit Manuscript