Emmanuel Levinas’s Ethics of Alterity and Its Relevance to Gender Equality in Patriarchal Indonesian Culture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55121/cci.v3i1.1178Abstract
Patriarchal culture in Indonesia continues to produce unequal gender relations and places women in subordinate positions across various areas of social life. This article aims to examine Emmanuel Levinas’s philosophical concept of alterity and to explore its relevance for efforts to promote gender equality within the context of patriarchal culture in Indonesia. Levinas’s philosophy of alterity asserts that ethical relations are grounded in an unconditional responsibility toward the “Other,” understood as the recognition of the dignity and uniqueness of every individual who must not be reduced to an object of domination. This study employs a qualitative descriptive approach using a literature review method, drawing on an analysis of Levinas’s major works as well as scholarly literature on gender and patriarchy in Indonesia. The data were analyzed interpretively to identify the conceptual relevance between the ethics of alterity and the struggle for gender equality. The findings indicate that the concept of ethical responsibility toward the Other provides a strong normative foundation for rejecting subordination, discrimination, and gender-based violence. Levinas’s thought thus offers a reflective framework that encourages the recognition of women as autonomous and dignified ethical subjects, thereby contributing to the development of more just, equal, and humane social relations in Indonesian society.
Keywords
Philosophy, Emmanuel Levinas, Gender, Women, PatriarchalReferences
[1] Highlen, J., 2021. Levinas and the political problem of original peace. Continental Philosophy Review. 54, 319–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-021-09536-x
[2] Cook, D., 2022. The more-than-human other of Levinas’s Totality & Infinity. Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy. 30(1), 58–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jffp.2022.1008
[3] Villarmea, S., 1999. The provocation of Levinas for feminism. The European Journal of Women’s Studies. 6(3), 291–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/135050689900600303
[4] Mueller, J., Kiefer, M., 2007. Women—Winners or Losers of Globalization? New Challenges for a Gender-Just World Order. Verlag W. Kohlhammer: Stuttgart, Germany. (in German)
[5] Madung, O.G.N., Mere, W.S., 2021. Constructing modern Indonesia based on Pancasila in dialogue with the political concepts underlying the idea of human rights. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights. 5(1), 1–24.
[6] Hamdy, M.K., Hudri, M., 2022. Gender based violence: The relationship of law and patriarchy in Indonesia. EMPATI: Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial. 11(2), 73–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/empati.v11i2.29751
[7] Sukmana, O., Nugroho, A., Sulastri, S., 2025. Feminism movement and challenges of patriarchy in Indonesian mass media. Jurnal Al-Ijtimaiyyah. 11(2), 326–336.
[8] Alfina, A., 2025. Sexual violence and gendered policy responses in an Indonesian urban governance: A critical feminist perspective. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan & Pelayanan Publik. 11(3), 295–313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31947/jakpp.v11i3.47816
[9] Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
[10] Barzola-Elizagaray, P., Agoglia, O., 2024. Deep ecology and the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas: The importance of moving from biocentric responsibility to environmental justice. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics. 24, 31–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00211
[11] Bax, C., 2017. Otherwise than being-with: Levinas on Heidegger and community. Human Studies. 40, 381–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-017-9432-x
[12] Bergen, J.P., 2017. Responsible innovation in light of Levinas: Rethinking the relation between responsibility and innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation. 4(3), 354–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2017.1387510
[13] Levinas, E., 1991. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, 4th ed. Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
[14] Gantt, E.E., Thayne, J.L., Garrett, M.R., 2024. Connecting the theoretical, the personal, and the ethical in psychology: George Kelly and Emmanuel Levinas. Journal of Mind and Behavior. 45(1), 67–94.
[15] Poleshchuk, I., 2010. Heidegger and Levinas: Metaphysics, ontology and the horizon of the other. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology. 10(2), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2989/IPJP.2010.10.2.4.1085
[16] Roesner, M., 2016. The nudity of the ego: An Eckhartian perspective on the Levinas/Derrida debate on alterity. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology. 47(1), 33–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2015.1100881
[17] Yuliastuti, A., Pasopati, R.U., 2021. The epiphany of faces of Covid-19 pandemic as reflected in Edgar Allan Poe’s The Masque of the Red Death. UC Journal: ELT, Linguistics and Literature Journal. 2(1), 43–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/uc.v2i1.3431
[18] Hadirman, B., 2007. Modern Philosophy: From Machiavelli to Nietzsche. Gramedia Pustaka Utama: Jakarta, Indonesia. (in Indonesian)
[19] Bergen, J.P., Verbeek, P.P., 2021. To-do is to be: Foucault, Levinas, and technologically mediated subjectivation. Philosophy and Technology. 34, 325–348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00390-7
[20] Hietanen, J., Sihvonen, A., 2021. Catering to otherness: Levinasian consumer ethics at Restaurant Day. Journal of Business Ethics. 168, 261–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04421-3
[21] Petrilli, S., 2021. The Law Challenged and the Critique of Identity with Emmanuel Levinas. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. 35, 31–69.
[22] Welten, R., 2020. In the beginning was violence: Emmanuel Levinas on religion and violence. Continental Philosophy Review. 53, 355–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-020-09491-z
[23] Lawrence, S., 2019. “I’m a Pacifist”: Peace in the Thought of Emmanuel Levinas. Religions. 10(2), 84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10020084
[24] Narayan, U., 1998. Essence of culture and a sense of history: A feminist critique of cultural essentialism. Hypatia. 13(2), 86–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01227.x
[25] Goswami, D., Hazarika, G., 2025. The Industrial Revolution in Western Europe: A Catalyst for Modern Society. The Voice of Creative Research. 7(3), 219–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53032/tvcr/2025.v7n3.24
[26] James, R., 2018. The gender politics of Music and the Ineffable: On the feminine in Jankelevitch and Levinas. Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology. 5(2), 99–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20539320.2018.1521570
[27] Giovanini, V., 2019. Alterity in Simone de Beauvoir and Emmanuel Levinas: From ambiguity to ambivalence. Hypatia. 34(1), 39–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12454
[28] Rosato, J., 2012. Woman as vulnerable self: The trope of maternity in Levinas’s Otherwise Than Being. Hypatia. 27(2), 348–365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01189.x
[29] White, S., Warburton, E., Hendrawan, A., 2024. Voting against women: Political patriarchy, Islam, and representation in Indonesia. Politics & Gender. 20(2), 391–421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X23000648
[30] Afrizal, R.F., Andini, F.A.D., Harmen, S.Y., 2025. Investigating socioeconomic determinants of women under patriarchal households. Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora. 14(1), 130–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v14i1.88423
Downloads
How to Cite
Copyright & License
Copyright (c) 2026 Henderikus Dasrimin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submit Manuscript