Gendered Regret in Chinese University English Classrooms: Toward a Five-Dimensional Analytical Framework

Authors

  • Jing Hou

    School of Humanities and Foreign Languages, Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi'an 710121, China
  • Xiaoming Tian *

    School of Humanities and Foreign Languages, Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi'an 710121, China
  • Siyi Sun

    School of Humanities and Foreign Languages, Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi'an 710121, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55121/jele.v2i1.1015

Keywords:

Gender, Regret, English, University, China

Abstract

This study uses semi-structured interviews to examine the emergence of gendered regrets in Chinese university English classrooms. Reflexive thematic analysis of interviews with 36 teachers and 53 students across 23 universities identifies how pedagogical practices, student psychology, social expectations, pragmatic language use, and intercultural communication interact to shape gendered experiences. Drawing on these findings, the study introduces the 'Regret Pentagon Diagram', a conceptual framework that categorizes the five dimensions contributing to gendered regret. Pedagogical practices, such as gendered grouping or role expectations, can limit student participation and agency. Psychological factors reveal how students experience self-doubt, discomfort, or exclusion when gendered assumptions conflict with individual identity. Social expectations, including teachers' authority and perceived social status, influence students’ gendered sense of fairness and opportunity. Pragmatic issues highlight how language choices and framing may unintentionally reinforce gender stereotypes, while intercultural communication demonstrates how culturally informed gender expectations can create tension in cross-cultural classrooms. The analysis shows that teachers' unexamined gender assumptions and insufficient cultural sensitivity can lead to student alienation, disengagement, and emotional distress. The study underscores the importance of gender-sensitive pedagogy, reflective teaching practice, and intercultural competence to promote equitable, inclusive, and context-responsive learning environments.

References

[1] OECD, 2025. Gender Equality in a Changing World: Taking Stock and Moving Forward. OECD Publishing: Paris, France.

[2] Sunderland, J., 2000. New understandings of gender and language classroom research: Texts, teacher talk and student talk. Language Teaching Research. 4(2), 149–173.

[3] Minasyan, S., 2017. Gendered patterns in teacher–student interaction in EFL classrooms. Journal of Language and Education. 3(3), 89–98.

[4] Åhslund, I., Boström, L., 2018. Teachers' perceptions of gender differences: What about boys and girls in the classroom? International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 17(4), 28–44.

[5] Gilovich, T., Medvec, V.H., 1995. The experience of regret: What, when, and why. Psychological Review. 102(2), 379–395.

[6] Kahneman, D., Tversky, A., 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 47(2), 263–291.

[7] Samuelson, W., Zeckhauser, R., 1988. Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1(1), 7–59.

[8] Hattiangadi, N., Medvec, V.H., Gilovich, T., 1995. Failing to act: Regrets of Terman's geniuses. International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 40(3), 175–185.

[9] Zeelenberg, M., Pieters, R., 2007. A theory of regret regulation 1.0. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 17(1), 3–18.

[10] Price, B., 2017. A Theory of Regret. Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA.

[11] Gabillon, E., 2020. When choosing is painful: Anticipated regret and psychological opportunity cost. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 178, 644–659.

[12] Kaur, P., Dhir, A., Chen, S., 2016. Understanding online regret experience using the theoretical lens of flow experience. Computers in Human Behavior. 57, 230–239.

[13] Farrugia, A., 2017. Gender, reputation and regret: The ontological politics of Australian drug education. Gender and Education. 29(3), 281–298.

[14] Johnson, M.A., Pétursdóttir, G.M., 2023. “We all have regrets; it doesn't mean we are failures”: Rejecting or regretting motherhood. Journal of Family Issues. 45(7), 1660–1682.

[15] Namkoong, J.-e., Ro, J.H., Hur, T., et al., 2022. Regrets over "me" versus regrets over "us": The influence of culture on action versus inaction regrets. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 25(3), 532–543.

[16] Zhang, X., Zeelenberg, M., Summerville, A., 2021. The role of self-discrepancies in distinguishing regret from guilt. Self and Identity. 20(3), 388–405.

[17] Wei, F.L., 2024. Teachers' attitudes toward regrets: A cultural comparative reading. Cultural Psychology. 31(3), 779–795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X241236746

[18] Gonsar, N., Patrick, L., Cotner, S., 2021. Graduate- and undergraduate-student perceptions of and preferences for teaching practices in STEM classrooms. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research. 3, 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00035-w

[19] Hoffmann, E.A., 2007. Open-ended interviews, power, and emotional labor. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 36(3), 318–346.

[20] Braun, V., Clarke, V., 2021. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflective) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology. 18(3), 328–352.

[21] Schlunegger, M.C., Zumstein-Shaha, M., Palm, R., 2024. Methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies: A scoping review. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 46(8), 611–622.

[22] Linell, P., 1998. Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives, Vol. 3. John Benjamins Publishing: Amsterdam, Netherlands.

[23] Vygotsky, L., 1986. Thought and Language. Kozulin, A. (Trans. and Ed.). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[24] Bao, L., Tian, X., 2022. Climbing the academic ladder: Chinese women academics seeking recognition on the way to becoming professors. International Journal of Educational Development. 91, 102597.

[25] Halstead, J.M., Taylor, M.J., 2000. Learning and teaching about values: A review of recent research. Cambridge Journal of Education. 30(2), 169–202.

[26] Li, J., 2023. Gender never defines me: A study on preschool teachers' do and don't about gender. Social Sciences and Humanities Open. 7(1), 100397.

[27] Gajda, A., Bójko, A., Stoecker, E., 2022. The vicious circle of stereotypes: Teachers' awareness of and responses to students' gender-stereotypical behaviour. PLOS One. 17(6), e0269007.

[28] Wang, L., Yu, Z., 2023. Gender-moderated effects of academic self-concept on achievement, motivation, performance, and self-efficacy: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology. 14, 1136141.

[29] Sánchez-Cabrero, R., Mañoso-Pacheco, L., León-Mejía, A.C., 2023. Gender-differentiated perceptions of teaching among preservice teachers of secondary education. Social Sciences. 12(8), 431.

[30] Andersen, I.G., Smith, E., 2022. Social contexts and gender disparities in students' competence beliefs: The role of gender-stereotypical beliefs and achievement patterns in the classroom for students' self-concept in gender-stereotypical subjects. Frontiers in Education. 7, 840618.

[31] Yang, Y., Zheng, J., 2024. Unfolding the moderating role of gender in the relationship between teacher support and students' well-being: Evidence from PISA 2022. Child Indicators Research. 17(6), 2503–2526.

[32] Mizala, A., Canals, C., Ortega, L., 2023. Educational Practices Series 36: Promoting Gender Equity in and through Education. UNESCO Press: Paris, France.

[33] Kimmel, M.S., 2000. The Gendered Society. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA.

[34] Stryker, S., Burke, P.J., 2000. The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly. 63(4), 284–297.

[35] Tian, X., Yuan, B., 2024. Beyond translation: Exploring the stigmatization of rainbow works translation under frame theory. Journal of Homosexuality. 72(6), 1151–1173.

[36] Allana, A., Asad, N., Sherali, Y., 2010. Gender in academic settings: Role of teachers. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology. 1(4), 343–348.

[37] Jennings, P.A., Greenberg, M.T., 2009. The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research. 79(1), 491–525.

[38] George, E.E., 2016. Handbook of research on gender and economic life. Eastern Economic Journal. 42(2), 314–316.

[39] Roorda, D.L., Koomen, H.M., Spilt, J.L., 2011. The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students' school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research. 81(4), 493–529.

[40] Eckert, P., McConnell-Ginet, S., 2013. Language and Gender, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[41] Bourdieu, P., 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Thompson, J.B. (Ed.). Raymond, G., Adamson, M. (Trans.). Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[42] Romaine, S., 2000. Language in Society: An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[43] Bucholtz, M., Hall, K., 2005. Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies. 7(4–5), 585–614.

[44] Butler, J., 2006. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge: London, UK.

[45] Guimond, S., Branscombe, N.R., Brunot, S., et al., 2007. Culture, gender, and the self: Variations and impact of social comparison processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 92(6), 1118–1134.

[46] Brownell, S., Wasserstrom, J.N. (Eds.), 2002. Chinese Femininities/Chinese Masculinities: A Reader. University of California Press: Oakland, CA, USA.

[47] Hall, E.T., 1976. Beyond Culture. Anchor Books of Doubleday: New York, NY, USA.

[48] Neculaesei, A.N., 2015. Culture and gender role differences. Cross-Cultural Management Journal. 17(1), 31–35.

[49] Soares, A.M., Farhangmehr, M., Shoham, A., 2007. Hofstede's dimensions of culture in international marketing studies. Journal of Business Research. 60(3), 277–284.

[50] Birks, M., Mills, J., 2015. Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide. Sage: London, UK.

[51] Ciecierski, T., Grabarczyk, P. (Eds.), 2020. The Architecture of Context and Context-Sensitivity. Springer: Cham, Switzerland.

[52] St J. Watson, P.W., Sotardi, V.A., Park, J., et al., 2021. Gender self-confidence, scholastic stress, life satisfaction, and perceived academic achievement for adolescent New Zealanders. Journal of Adolescence. 88(1), 120–133.

[53] Lietaert, S., Roorda, D., Laevers, F., et al., 2015. The gender gap in student engagement: The role of teachers' autonomy support, structure, and involvement. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 85(4), 498–518.

[54] Kuteesa, K.N., Akpuokwe, C.U., Udeh, C.A., 2024. Gender equity in education: Addressing challenges and promoting opportunities for social empowerment. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences. 6(4), 631–641.

[55] Tian, X., Rao, Y., Chen, Z., 2024. Love is (not) love? Exploring Chinese university teachers' agency in translating rainbow works. Gender and Education. 37(2), 192–209.

Downloads

How to Cite

Hou, J., Tian, X., & Sun, S. (2026). Gendered Regret in Chinese University English Classrooms: Toward a Five-Dimensional Analytical Framework. Journal of Education and Learning Environments, 2(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.55121/jele.v2i1.1015

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (June 2026): In Progress

Section

Research Article