Artificial Intelligence and Case-Based Learning in Social Work Education: Pedagogical Considerations and Future Directions
Authors
-
Mark Taylor
*
School of Mind, Body and Society, Goldsmiths, University of London, London SE14 6NW, UK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55121/jele.v2i1.1050Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more prevalent in higher education, it raises important pedagogical, ethical, and disciplinary questions. This theoretical paper develops a comprehensive theoretical foundation for considering the use of AI-generated case studies in social work education and examines the implications for teaching, learning, and professional identity formation. The theoretical framework is not exhaustive. Nevertheless, by drawing on Entwistle’s conception of deep learning, Biggs and Tang’s constructive alignment, new materialist perspectives on classroom technology assemblages, and critical discursive frameworks informed by Foucault and Packer, this paper argues that AI-generated case studies can enhance social work students’ reflexivity when used with careful oversight. AI can expand the discursive space, diversify representational possibilities, and save lecturers’ preparation time. Nevertheless, AI presents significant risks related to bias, representational ethics, and over-standardisation. Informed by practice realities, risks can be mediated by drawing on practitioner wisdom to orchestrate AI case study prompts and anchor AI-produced narratives. This theoretical paper emphasises the need for critical AI literacy, transparent governance, and educator–practitioner collaboration to ensure that AI serves as a tool for deep, anti-oppressive, and justice-oriented learning. AI-assisted case study pedagogy is shown to be most valuable when it strengthens, rather than diminishes, human judgement, reflexive practices, and relational social work education. This is a theoretical and conceptual paper. It does not report any empirical findings. Instead, it offers a structured synthesis of relevant pedagogical, philosophical, and practice-based literature to develop a framework for critically integrating AI-generated case studies into social work education.
Keywords:
Social Work Education, Artificial Intelligence, Case Studies, Deep Learning, Constructive Alignment, New MaterialismReferences
[1] Healy, K., 2022. Social Work Theories in Context: Creating Frameworks for Practice. Bloomsbury Academic: London, UK.
[2] Lee, E., Mishna, F., Brennenstuhl, S., 2010. How to Critically Evaluate Case Studies in Social Work. Research on Social Work Practice. 20(6), 682–689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731509347864
[3] Littman, D.M., Bell, F., Al Wazni, A., et al., 2025. Pedagogies of Possibility: Case Studies from Using Foresight Tools in the Social Work Classroom. Social Work Education. 44(4), 930–947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2024.2368171
[4] Cheung, J.C.-S., Mo, K.Y.-H., Tsang, W.W.-H., et al., 2025. Developing a User Typology of Adopting Innovative Technologies in Social Work. The British Journal of Social Work. 55(6), 3054–3073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaf087
[5] Goldkind, L., Wolf, L., Glennon, A., et al., 2024. The End of the World as We Know It? ChatGPT and Social Work. Social Work. 69(1), 103–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swad044
[6] Hämäläinen, J., Lindh, J., 2025. Social Work in an Information-Intensive Era: Digitalization in Social Work Practices, Expertise, Training, and Research. International Social Work. 69(2), 187–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00208728251382817
[7] Báez, J.C., Bjugstad, A., Park, T.K., et al., 2025. Social Work Educators Innovating with Generative AI: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Social Work Education. 61(1), 14–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2024.2411170
[8] Reamer, F.G., 2023. Artificial Intelligence in Social Work: Emerging Ethical Issues. International Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics. 20(2), 52–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55521/10-020-205
[9] Entwistle, N.J., 2009. Teaching for Understanding at University: Deep Approaches and Distinctive Ways of Thinking. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, UK.
[10] Biggs, J., Tang, C., 1999. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. Open University Press: Maidenhead, UK.
[11] Kinchin, I.M., Gravett, K., 2022. Dominant Discourses in Higher Education: Critical Perspectives, Cartographies and Practice. Bloomsbury Academic: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350180314
[12] Taylor, M., 2018. Understanding Stories of Professional Formation during Early Childhood Education and Care Practice Placements. Irish Educational Studies. 37(2), 227–241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2018.1465838
[13] Rabinow, P., 1984. Polemics, Politics, and Problemizations: An Interview with Michel Foucault. In The Foucault Reader. Pantheon Books: New York, NY, USA. pp. 381–390.
[14] Cecchin, G., Lane, G., Ray, W.A., 1993. Irreverence: A Strategy for Therapists' Survival. Routledge: London, UK.
[15] Foucault, M., 1986. The History of Sexuality, Vol. II: The Use of Pleasure. Vintage Books: New York, NY, USA.
[16] Packer, M.J., 2018. The Science of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
[17] Lee, M.-Y., Greene, G.J., 1999. A Social Constructivist Framework for Integrating Cross-Cultural Issues in Teaching Clinical Social Work. Journal of Social Work Education. 35(1), 21–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1999.10778944
[18] Dallos, R., Vetere, A., 2021. Systemic Therapy and Attachment Narratives: Applications in a Range of Clinical Settings, 2nd ed. Routledge: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003080152
[19] Kong, S.-T., Stepanova, E., Thanki, V., 2023. Collaborative Practice Research in Social Work: Piloting a Model for Research and Professional Learning during COVID-19. European Social Work Research. 1(1), 84–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/XPUV7930
[20] Brown, J., 1997. Circular Questioning: An Introductory Guide. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy. 18(2), 109–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1467-8438.1997.tb00276.x
[21] Social Work England, 2019. Professional Standards. Available from: https://www.socialworkengland.org.uk/standards/professional-standards/ (cited 20 December 2025).
[22] Parker, J., 2025. Social Work Practice: Assessment, Planning, Intervention and Review. Learning Matters: London, UK.
[23] British Association of Social Workers, 2018. Professional Capabilities Framework for Social Work in England Guidance on Using the 2018 Refreshed PCF. Available from: https://basw.co.uk/sites/default/files/2023-07/PCF%20Final%20Documents%20Overview%2011%20June%202018.pdf (cited 20 December 2025).
[24] Land, R., Meyer, J.H.F., Baillie, C., 2010. Editors' Preface: Threshold Concepts and Transformational Learning. In Threshold Concepts and Transformational Learning. Sense Publishers: Rotterdam, The Netherlands. pp. ix–xlii.
[25] Bower, M., 2004. Psychoanalytic Theories for Social Work Practice: Thinking under Fire. Routledge: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203341155_chapter_1
[26] Barradell, S., 2013. The Identification of Threshold Concepts: A Review of Theoretical Complexities and Methodological Challenges. Higher Education. 65, 265–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9542-3
[27] Clandinin, D.J., Huber, J., 2010. Narrative Inquiry. In: McGaw, B., Baker, E., Peterson, P.P. (Eds.). International Encyclopedia of Education, 3rd ed. Elsevier: New York, NY, USA. pp. 436–441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01387-7
[28] Wang, C.C., Geale, S.K., 2015. The Power of Story: Narrative Inquiry as a Methodology in Nursing Research. International Journal of Nursing Sciences. 2(2), 195–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2015.04.014
[29] Kwong, J.M., Fawson, P.R., 2022. Practitioner Wisdom: A Conceptual Approach. The British Journal of Social Work. 52(8), 4721–4737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcac086
[30] Taylor, M., Folarin, E., Greenchester, A., 2023. The Impact on Two Practising Social Workers Who Taught Social Work Students in a University Setting. International Journal of Practice-Based Learning in Health and Social Care. 11(1), 92–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18552/ijpblhsc.v11i1.781
[31] Moseley, A., Taylor, M., Wilson, S., et al., 2024. Reflections from Members of a Collaborative Social Work Practitioner-Academic Research Team. Critical and Radical Social Work. 12(3), 432–440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/20498608Y2024D000000027
[32] Taylor, C.A., 2018. Edu-Crafting Posthumanist Adventures in/for Higher Education. Parallax. 24(3), 371–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2018.1496585
[33] Bateson, G., 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA.
[34] Deleuze, G., Guattari, F., 1994. What Is Philosophy? Verso Books: London, UK.
[35] Banks, S., 2020. Ethics and Values in Social Work. Bloomsbury Academic: London, UK.
[36] Thompson, N., 2020. Anti-Discriminatory Practice: Equality, Diversity and Social Justice. Bloomsbury Publishing: London, UK.
[37] Kamel, H., 2024. Understanding the Impact of AI Hallucinations on the University Community. Cybrarians Journal. 73, 111–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70000/cj.2024.73.622
[38] Molala, T.S., 2025. Social Work in the Digital Age: Towards Adopting Artificial Intelligence in Social Work. International Social Work. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00208728251383134
[39] Taylor, M., James, S., 2023. How Social Work Managers Can Benefit from Teaching Social Work Students in a University. Irish Journal of Academic Practice. 11(1), 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21427/8R7P-FS57
[40] Holzinger, A., Saranti, A., Angerschmid, A., et al., 2023. Toward Human-Level Concept Learning: Pattern Benchmarking for AI Algorithms. Patterns. 4(8), 100788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100788
[41] Haarlammert, M., Birman, D., Oberoi, A., et al., 2017. Inside-Out: Representational Ethics and Diverse Communities. American Journal of Community Psychology. 60(3–4), 414–423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12188
[42] Jude, J., 2018. The Practice of Systemic Reflexivity. Journal of Social Work Practice. 32(1), 45–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2017.1291499
[43] Trevithick, P., 2008. Revisiting the Knowledge Base of Social Work: A Framework for Practice. British Journal of Social Work. 38(6), 1212–1237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm026
[44] Memarian, B., Doleck, T., 2023. Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics (FATE) in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Higher Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 5, 100152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100152
[45] Lan, H., 2025. Sustainable Development of Social Responsibility in Universities in the Digital Era. Information Development. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669241303124
[46] Aubrey, K., Riley, A., 2022. Understanding and Using Educational Theories, 3rd ed. Sage: London, UK.
[47] Simon, G., 2023. Reflexivity 3: Breaking Out of Reflexive Loops to Decolonise Practice. Murmurations: Journal of Transformative Systemic Practice. 6(2), 53–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28963/6.2.4
[48] Bearman, M., Ryan, J., Ajjawi, R., 2023. Discourses of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Critical Literature Review. Higher Education. 86(2), 369–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00937-2
[49] Loyens, S.M.M., Gijbels, D., 2008. Understanding the Effects of Constructivist Learning Environments: Introducing a Multi-Directional Approach. Instructional Science. 36(5), 351–357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9059-4
[50] Segal, M., 2025. Confronting and Managing Ethical Dilemmas in Social Work Using ChatGPT. European Journal of Social Work. 28(1), 155–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2024.2377786
[51] Lou-Barton, G., Davis, S.D., 2019. Systems Theory. In: Lebow, J., Chambers, A., Breunlin, D.C. (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 2894–2899. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_327
[52] Sennett, R., 2019. Building and Dwelling: Ethics for the City. Penguin Books UK: London, UK.
[53] Von Bertalanffy, L., 2017. The History and Status of General Systems Theory. Academy of Management Journal. 15(4), 407–426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/255139
[54] St. Pierre, E.A., 2000. Poststructural Feminism in Education: An Overview. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 13(5), 477–515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390050156422
[55] Nuwasiima, M., Ahonon, M.P., Kadiri, C., 2024. The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning in Social Work Practice. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 24(1), 80–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.24.1.2998
[56] Walker, A.P., Banks, L., Gibbs, D.J., et al., 2025. Generative Artificial Intelligence Use among Social Work Students: The Role of Perceived Utility and Knowledge. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work. 23(1), 177–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2025.2596186
[57] Barad, K., 2003. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 28(3), 801–831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
[58] Reynolds, V., 2019. Justice-Doing at the Intersections of Power: Community Work, Therapy and Supervision. Dulwich Centre Publications: Adelaide, Australia.
