Understanding Communication Skill during Blended Learning: A Partially Mixed-Methods Analysis
Authors
-
Pooja Jaswal
Department of Education, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda 151401, India
-
Biswajit Behera
*
Division of Educational Research, National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT), New Delhi 110016, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55121/jele.v2i1.1169Abstract
The present study executed blended learning to develop students' communication skills. The study aimed to explore how blended learning enhances the communication skills of secondary school students. The participants were 29 secondary school students who were selected using a purposive sampling technique. The study mainly explores communication patterns collected from qualitative data. Qualitative data were collected through field notes, focus group interviews, and students’ learning logs. Quantitative data on communication skills were collected using a standardised tool administered to 29 participants. The scale encompassed four key dimensions: (1) awareness of one's own communication style, (2) understanding and valuing others' communication styles, (3) practising empathy, and (4) interaction during blended learning. Responses were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale: 5 (Always), 4 (Very often), 3 (Sometimes), 2 (Seldom), and 1 (Never). The accumulated scores of each participant were quantitative in nature. The communication scale served a supplementary, exploratory purpose to triangulate qualitative findings. Hence, the study used a partially mixed sequential dominant status design. The results identified eight themes: listening to others, supporting others, accepting others' views, writing ability, online sharing, responding, encouraging others, and making gestures. Integrated findings depicted that blended learning enabled students to have positive experiences in improving their communication skills. Thus, blended learning should be designed to allow learners to practice what they have learned from face-to-face instruction anytime and anywhere.
Keywords:
Blended Learning, Communication, Group Sharing, CollaborationReferences
[1] Saimon, M., Lavicza, Z., Dana-Picard, T., 2023. Enhancing the 4Cs among college students of a communication skills course in Tanzania through a project-based learning model. Education and Information Technologies. 28(6), 6269–6285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11406-9
[2] Pardede, P., 2020. Integrating the 4Cs into EFL integrated skills learning. Journal of English Teaching. 6(1), 71–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v6i1.190
[3] Hummel, T.G., Cohen, F., Anders, Y., 2023. Parents’ trust in their child’s preschool: Associations with child and family characteristics and aspects of parent-preschool communication. Early Education and Development. 34(5), 1057–1074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2022.2101344
[4] van Laar, E., van Deursen, A.J.A.M., van Dijk, J.A.M., et al., 2020. Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers: A systematic literature review. Sage Open. 10(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
[5] Mali, D., Lim, H., 2021. How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic? The International Journal of Management Education. 19(3), 100552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100552
[6] National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT), 2023. National Curriculum Framework for School Education 2023. NCERT: New Delhi, India. Available from: https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NCF-School-Education-Pre-Draft.pdf
[7] National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT), 2005. National Curriculum Framework 2005. NCERT: New Delhi, India. Available from: https://ncert.nic.in/pdf/nc-framework/nf2005-english.pdf
[8] Dhawan, S., 2020. Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 49(1), 5–22.
[9] Ortega-Arranz, A., Amarasinghe, I., Martínez-Monés, A., et al., 2024. Collaborative activities in hybrid learning environments: Exploring teacher orchestration load and students’ perceptions. Computers & Education. 219, 105105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105105
[10] Lohiniva, M., Isomöttönen, V., 2021. Novice programming students' reflections on study motivation during COVID-19 pandemic. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Lincoln, NE, USA, 13–16 October 2021; pp. 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637367
[11] Amarasinghe, I., Hernández-Leo, D., Ulrich Hoppe, H., 2021. Deconstructing orchestration load: Comparing teacher support through mirroring and guiding. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 16, 307–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09351-9
[12] Kamaruzaman, N.A., Hasan, N.A.M., 2026. Reimagining inclusive HyFlex teaching through participatory communication and Universal Design for Learning. Learning Environment Research. 29, 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-026-09567-2
[13] Lai, Z.C.C., 2026. AI in EFL blended learning: Impact on speaking performance and learning resilience. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education. 11, 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-025-00367-4
[14] Hasanah, H., Malik, M.N., 2020. Blended learning in improving students’ critical thinking and communication skills at University. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences. 15(5), 1295–1306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i5.5168
[15] Banditvilai, C., 2016. Enhancing students’ language skills through blended learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning. 14(3), 223–232. DOI: https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/1757
[16] Lightbown, P.M., Spada, N., 2020. Teaching and learning L2 in the classroom: It’s about time. Language Teaching. 53(4), 422–432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000454
[17] Liang, M.Y., Bonk, C.J., 2009. Interaction in blended EFL learning: Principles and practice. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 6(1), 3–15. DOI: https://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_09/Jan_09.pdf#page=7
[18] Monteiro, E., Morrison, K., 2014. Challenges for collaborative blended learning in undergraduate studies. Educational Research and Evaluation. 20(7–8), 564–591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2014.997126
[19] Prohorets, E., Plekhanova, M., 2015. Interaction intensity levels in blended learning environment. Procedia –Social and Behavioural Sciences. 174, 3818–3823.
[20] Kumar, J.A., Bervell, B., 2019. Google Classroom for mobile learning in higher education: Modelling the initial perceptions of students. Education and Information Technologies. 24(2), 1793–1817. DOI: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-018-09858-z
[21] Shana, Z., Alyatim, T.M., Alkhazaleh, M., et al., 2021. The use of Google Classroom to support the learning process. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies. 16(5), 171–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.20210901.oa10
[22] Sujannah, W.D., Cahyono, B.Y., Astuti, U.P., 2020. Effect of blended learning using Google Classroom on writing ability of EFL students across autonomy levels. Teaching English with Technology. 20(2), 82–97.
[23] Sholikh, M.N., Sulisworo, D., Maruto, G., 2019. Effects of cooperative blended learning using Google Classroom on critical thinking skills. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Community Development (ICCD 2019), Bandar Seri Begawan, Indonesia, 24–25 July 2019; pp. 326–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/iccd-19.2019.86
[24] Vaughan, N., Lawrence, K., 2013. Investigating the role of mobile devices in a blended pre-service teacher education program. Canadian Journal of Higher Education. 43(3), 56–77. DOI: https://journals.sfu.ca/cjhe/index.php/cjhe/article/view/184675/184311
[25] Roschelle, J., Rafanan, K., Bhanot, R., et al., 2010. Scaffolding group explanation and feedback with handheld technology: Impact on students’ mathematics learning. Educational Technology Research and Development. 58, 399–419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9142-9
[26] Banados, E., 2006. A blended-learning pedagogical model for teaching and learning EFL successfully through an online interactive multimedia environment. CALICO Journal. 23(3), 533–550.
[27] Giordano, V., Koch, H., Godoy-Santos, A., et al., 2017. WhatsApp Messenger as an adjunctive tool for telemedicine: An overview. Interactive Journal of Medical Research. 6(2), e11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.6214
[28] Aswir, A., Hadi, M.S., Dewi, F.R., 2021. Google Meet application as an online learning media for descriptive text material. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran. 4(1), 189–194.
[29] Plano Clark, V.L., 2017. Mixed methods research. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 12(3), 305–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262619
[30] Leech, N.L., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., 2009. A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity. 43(2), 265–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3
[31] Schatzmann, L., Strauss, A.L., 1973. Field Research: Strategies for a Natural Sociology. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
[32] Luders, C., 2004. Field observation and ethnography. In: Flick (Ed.). A Companion to Qualitative Research. Sage Publications: London, UK. pp. 222–230.
[33] Agosto, D.E., Copeland, A.J., Zach, L., 2013. Testing the benefits of blended education: Using social technology to foster collaboration and knowledge sharing in face-to-face LIS courses. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. 54(2), 94–107.
[34] Sriarunrasmee, J., Techataweewan, W., Mebusaya, R.P., 2015. Blended learning supporting self-directed learning and communication skills of Srinakharinwirot University's first-year students. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 197, 1564–1569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.111
[35] Suwono, H., Dewi, E.K., 2019. Problem-based learning blended with online interaction to improve motivation, scientific communication and higher order thinking skills of high school students. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2081(1), 030003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5094001
[36] Zahedi, S., Bryant, C.L., Iyer, A., et al., 2023. The use of blended learning to promote learner-centered pedagogy in elementary mathematics classrooms. Educational Research for Policy and Practice. 22, 389–408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-023-09346-3
[37] Schön, D.A., 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA.
