Exploring Gender and Academic Major Differences in Academic Self-Efficacy Among University Students in Xi’an, China

Authors

  • Yueqi Liu

    Faculty of Social Sciences and Liberal Arts, UCSI University, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, Cheras 56000, Malaysia
  • Genevieve Dipolog-Ubanan *

    Faculty of Social Sciences and Liberal Arts, UCSI University, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, Cheras 56000, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55121/jele.v1i1.543

Keywords:

Academic Self-Efficacy , Academic Performance , Chinese University Students , Gender Disparities , STEM and Non-STEM Fields , Higher Education

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between academic self-efficacy and academic performance among university students in Xi’an, China, while also exploring disparities in self-efficacy based on gender and academic major. Grounded in Bandura’s social cognitive theory, the research employs a quantitative, cross-sectional correlational design. A total of 389 undergraduate students from 29 universities were recruited through stratified random sampling. Data were collected using the College Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (CASES) and the Academic Performance Scale (APS) and analyzed using Pearson correlation and independent samples t-tests. The results reveal a moderate to strong positive correlation between academic self-efficacy and academic performance (r = 0.594, p < 0.001), indicating that students with higher self-efficacy tend to achieve better academic performance. Additionally, male students exhibited
significantly higher self-efficacy levels than female students, and STEM students reported greater self-efficacy compared to non-STEM students. These findings highlight the role of academic self-efficacy in student success and suggest that universities should implement targeted interventions, such as mentorship programs and structured feedback mechanisms, to enhance self-efficacy. Addressing gender disparities and providing additional support for non-STEM students can further promote equity in higher education. Future research should consider longitudinal studies and additional contextual factors to deepen the understanding of self-efficacy development and its impact on academic performance.

References

[1] Bandura, A., 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social-Cognitive View. The Academy of Management Review. 12(1), 169.

[2] Yusof, N.S.H.C., Abd Razak, N.F., Nordin, N.I., et al., 2021. Self-efficacy, Motivation, Learning Strategy and Their Impacts on Academic Performance. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 11(9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i9/11028

[3] Freire, C., Ferradás, M. del M., Regueiro, B., et al., 2020. Coping Strategies and Self-Efficacy in University Students: A Person-Centered Approach. Frontiers in Psychology. 11(841), 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00841

[4] Honicke, T., Broadbent, J., 2016. The Influence of Academic Self-Efficacy on Academic Performance: A Systematic Review. Educational Research Review. 17, 63–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002

[5] Fu, Y., 2024. The Impact of Gaokao High-Stakes Testing on Student Mental Health in China: An Analysis of Stress Levels and Coping Mechanisms Among Senior High School Students. Research and Advances in Education. 3(5), 23–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56397/rae.2024.05.03

[6] Lei, W., Wang, X., Dai, D.Y., et al., 2022. Academic Self-Efficacy and Academic Performance Among High School Students: A Moderated Mediation Model of Academic Buoyancy and Social Support. Psychology in the Schools. 59(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22653

[7] Wang, M.T., Guo, J., Degol, J.L., 2020. The Role of Sociocultural Factors in Student Achievement Motivation: A Cross-Cultural Review. Adolescent Research Review. 5(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00124-y

[8] Bandura, A., 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–604. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/28274869/Albert_Bandura_Self_Efficacy_The_Exercise_of_Control_W_H_Freeman_and_Co_1997_pdf (cited 12 January 2025).

[9] Cuc, M.C., 2019. The Relationship Between Self-Esteem and Academic Success. The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. 63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.06.6

[10] Wei, B., Dipolog-Ubanan, G.F., Khodi, A., et al., 2023. The Effect of Learning Strategy and Self-Efficacy on Speaking Competence of Higher Vocational College Students: Anxiety as a Mediator. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice. 29(4), 1437–1447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i5.4194

[11] Fonteyne, L., Duyck, W., De Fruyt, F., 2017. Program-Specific Prediction of Academic Achievement on the Basis of Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Factors. Learning and Individual Differences. 56, 34–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.05.003

[12] Usher, E.L., Pajares, F., 2008. Sources of Self-Efficacy in School: Critical Review of the Literature and Future Directions. Review of Educational Research. 78(4), 751–796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321456

[13] Zimmerman, B.J., 2002. Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory into Practice. 41(2), 64–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

[14] Mulaudzi, I.C., 2023. Factors Affecting Students’ Academic Performance: A Case Study of the University Context. Journal of Social Science for Policy Implications. 11(1), 18–26. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378709144 (cited 6 September 2024).

[15] Schunk, D.H., Zimmerman, B.J., Weinstein, C.E., 2023. Self-Regulating Academic Study Time: A Strategy Approach. In: Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 181–199.

[16] Guven, M., Baldan Babayıgıt, B., 2020. Self-Regulated Learning Skills of Undergraduate Students and the Role of Higher Education in Promoting Self-Regulation. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 20(89), 47-70. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344494839 (cited 6 September 2024).

[17] Manda, D., 2023. The Effect of Providing Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation on Student Learning Difficulties. Celebes Journal of Elementary Education. 1(2), 46–54.

[18] Estriegana, R., Medina, J., Robina, R., et al., 2021. Virtual Learning Environment to Encourage Students’ Relationships and Cooperative Competence Acquisition. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education v. 1, Tallinn, Estonia, June 26–28 2021; pp. 53–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3430665.3456363

[19] Gillen-O’Neel, C., 2019. Sense of Belonging and Student Engagement: A Daily Study of First- and Continuing-Generation College Students. Research in Higher Education. 62(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09570-y

[20] Eagly, A.H., Kite, M.E., 1987. Are Stereotypes of Nationalities Applied to Both Women and Men? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 53(3), 451–462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.451

[21] Hartman, R.L., Barber, E.G., 2020. Women in the workforce: the effect of gender on occupational self-efficacy, work engagement and career aspirations. Gender in Management: An International Journal. 35(1), 92–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/gm-04-2019-0062

[22] Chan, R.C.H., 2022. A social cognitive perspective on gender disparities in self-efficacy, interest, and aspirations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): the influence of cultural and gender norms. International Journal of STEM Education. 9(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00352-0

[23] Johnson, I.Y., Muse, W.B., 2017. Choice of Academic Major at a Public Research University: The Role of Gender and Self-Efficacy. Research in Higher Education. 58(4), 365–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-016-9431-1

[24] Wood, D.R., 2016. The impact of students’ perceived relatedness and competence upon their motivated engagement with learning activities: a self-determination theory perspective [PhD Thesis]. University of Birmingham: Birmingham, UK. pp. 1–200. Available from: http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/6627/1/Wood16PhD.pdf (cited 6 February 2025).

[25] Schunk, D.H., DiBenedetto, M.K., 2022. Self-Efficacy and Engaged Learners. Springer EBooks. pp. 155–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07853-8_8

[26] Romdhani, A., Sahli, F., Ghouili, H., et al., 2024. Exploring the impact of verbal encouragement on strength, endurance, and psychophysiological responses: enhancing teaching strategies in sports science education. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1360717

[27] Colgan, N.K., 2016. Effect of Perceived Academic Pressure on Depression, Anxiety, Stress and Self-efficacy in Leaving Certificate Students. Available from: https://esource.dbs.ie/server/api/core/bitstreams/56ddd47b-f657-43fc-842d-e0aadfeb94bb/content (cited 6 February 2025).

[28] Weyant, E., 2022. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries. 19(1-2), 1–2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2022.2046231

[29] Talsma, K., Schüz, B., Schwarzer, R., et al., 2018. I believe, therefore I achieve (and vice versa): A meta-analytic cross-lagged panel analysis of self-efficacy and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences. 61, 136–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.015

[30] Li, C., Bai, F., 2020. The role of academic self-efficacy in Chinese students’ academic performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology. 112(5), 981–995.

[31] Zhao, Z., Ren, P., Yang, Q., 2024. Student self-management, academic achievement: Exploring the mediating role of self-efficacy and the moderating influence of gender insights from a survey conducted in 3 universities in America. ArXiv.org. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.11029

[32] Wang, M.-T., Degol, J.L., 2017. Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions. Educational Psychology Review. 29(1), 119–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x

[33] Maries, A., Karim, N.I., Singh, C., 2020. Active Learning in an Inequitable Learning Environment Can Increase the Gender Performance Gap: The Negative Impact of Stereotype Threat. The Physics Teacher. 58(6), 430–433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0001844

[34] Li, Y., Zhang, X., 2021. Parental expectations and gender differences in academic self-efficacy among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Adolescence. 68(3), 102–112.

[35] Sithole, A., Chiyaka, E., Mccarthy, P., et al., 2017. Student Attraction, Persistence and Retention in STEM Programs: Successes and Continuing Challenges. Higher Education Studies. 7(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n1p46

[36] Kuchynka, S., Reifsteck, T.V., Gates, A.E., et al., 2021. Developing Self-Efficacy and Behavioral Intentions Among Underrepresented Students in STEM: The Role of Active Learning. Frontiers in Education. 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.668239

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (May 2025)

Section

Articles