Onomasiological and Semasiological Perspectives in Studies on Neology

Authors

  • Bruno Maroneze *

    School of Communication, Federal University of Dourados, Dourados, MS 79804-970, Brazil
  • João Henrique Lara Ganança

    Sao Paulo State Department of Education, Sao Paulo, SP 01022-000, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55121/le.v1i1.188

Keywords:

Neology, Onomasiology, Semasiology, Morphology, Lexical Semantics

Abstract

This paper presents a theoretical and methodological model for applying the concepts of onomasiology and semasiology to studies on neology. The creation of a neologism can be seen as an onomasiological process (from concept to denomination), whereas the interpretation of a neologism may be regarded as a semasiological process (from denomination to concept). In other words, the creator of a neologism starts from the concept he/she has in mind to find the best way to express it linguistically (onomasiology); the decoder of a neologism, in turn, starts from a neological expression to identify the meaning(s) intended by it (semasiology). In analyzing a neologism from one perspective or the other, different questions may be asked: a) from an onomasiological point of view, what linguistic resources are available to the speaker to create a neologism with the intended meaning; what resources are best suited to the specific communicative intentions of the creator of a neologism; how do phonological, syntactic, semantic, and factors influence the choice of a lexical creation mechanism? b) from a semasiological point of view, what are the possible meanings of a given neologism; what mechanisms can the listener use to properly interpret a neologism? The argument is exemplified with the analysis of neologisms in the Base de neologismos do português brasileiro contemporâneo (Contemporary Brazilian Portuguese Neologism Database) and in the corpus of journalistic blogs that integrate Ganança’s dissertation.

References

[1] Geeraerts, D., 1997. Diachronic Prototype Semantics. Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK.

[2] Maroneze, B., 2011. Um estudo da mudança de classe gramatical em unidades lexicais neológicas [A study on word class change in neological lexical units] [PhD Thesis]. São Paulo, SP: Universidade de São Paulo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/T.8.2011.tde-28092011-102939

[3] Guilbert, L., 1972. Théorie du néologisme. Cahiers de l’Association Internationale des Etudes Françaises. 25, 9–29. Available from: https://www.persee.fr/doc/caief_0571-5865_1973_num_25_1_1020 (cited 16 January 2025).

[4] Guilbert, L., 1975. La créativité lexicale. Larousse: Paris, France.

[5] Sablayrolles, J.F., 1996–1997. Néologismes: une typologie des typologies. Cahiers du CIEL. Université Paris 7: Paris, France. pp. 11–48.

[6] Maroneze, B., 2005. Um estudo da nominalização no Português do Brasil com base em unidades lexicais neológicas [A study on nominalization in Brazilian Portuguese based on neological lexical units] [Master Thesis]. São Paulo, SP: Universidade de São Paulo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/D.8.2006.tde-22022006-200500

[7] Alves, I.M., 2004. Neologismo. Criação lexical [Neologism. Lexical creation], 2nd ed. Ática: São Paulo, Brazil.

[8] Alves, I.M., 2004. A unidade lexical neológica: do histórico-social ao morfológico. [Neological lexical unit: from social-history to morphology] In: Isquerdo, A.N., Krieger, M.G. (eds.). As ciências do léxico [Studies on the lexicon], vol. II. Ed. UFMS: Campo Grande, Brazil. pp. 77–87.

[9] Ganança, J.H.L., 2017. Um estudo da prefixação em unidades lexicais neológicas coletadas de blogs da internet [A study on prefixation in neological lexical units collected from online blogs] [Master Thesis]. São Paulo, SP: Universidade de São Paulo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/D.8.2017.tde-05072017-105742

[10] Maroneze, B.; Ganança, J.H.L., 2021. Perspectivas onomasiológica e semasiológica nos estudos de neologia. LaborHistórico. 6(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24206/lh.v6i1.31296

[11] Blank, A., 1999. Why do new meanings occur? A cognitive typology of the motivations for lexical semantic change. In: Blank, A., Koch, P. (eds.). Historical Semantics and Cognition. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany. pp. 61–89.

[12] Langacker, R.W., 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: descriptive application. Stanford University Press: Stanford, USA.

[13] Alves, I.M., 2006. A observação sistemática da neologia lexical: subsídios para o estudo do léxico [Systematic observation of lexical neology: contributions to the study of the lexicon]. ALFA: Revista de Linguística. 50(2), 131–144. Available from: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/1415 (cited 31 March 2025).

[14] Langacker, R.W., 2008. Cognitive Grammar: a basic introduction. Oxford University Press: New York, USA.

[15] Štekauer, P., 2011. Fundamental principles of an onomasiological theory of English word-formation. In: Grzega, J. (ed.). A Recollection of 11 Years of Onomasiology Online (2000-2010). University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt: Eichstätt, Germany. pp. 15–54. Available from: https://www1.ku.de/SLF/EngluVglSW/OnOn-Total.pdf (cited 11 November 2024).

[16] Rocha, L.C.A., 1999. A nominalização no português do Brasil. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem. 8(1), 5–52.

[17] Plag, I., 2003. Word-Formation in English. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[18] Croft, W,; Cruse, D.A., 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[19] Alves, I.M., 2000. Um estudo sobre a neologia lexical: os microssistemas prefixais do português contemporâneo [Habilitation Thesis]. Universidade de São Paulo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/T.8.2000.tde-17072023-125209

[20] Cruse, D.A., 2000. Meaning in language. An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[21] Rainer, F., 2005. Semantic change in word formation. Linguistics. 43(2), 415–441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.2.415

[22] Lakoff, G.; Johnson, M., 1980. Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USA.

[23] Panther, K.-U.; Radden, G. (eds.), 1999. Metonymy in language and thought. John Benjamins: Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

[24] Silva, A.S., 2006. O mundo dos sentidos em português. Polissemia, semântica e cognição. [The world of senses in Portuguese. Polysemy, semantics and cognition] Almedina: Coimbra, Portugal.

[25] Cunha, C.; Cintra, L.F.L., 1985. Nova gramática do português contemporâneo [New contemporary Portuguese grammar]. Nova Fronteira: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

[26] Lapa, M.R., 1968. Estilística da língua portuguesa [Portuguese language Stylistics], 5th ed. Livraria Acadêmica: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

[27] Martins, N.S., 1997. Introdução à Estilística [Introduction to Stylistics] , 2nd ed. T. A. Queiroz: São Paulo, Brazil.

[28] Viaro, M.E., 2006. Problemas de morfologia e semântica histórica do sufixo -eiro [Problems of historical morphology and semantics of the suffix -eiro]. Estudos Lingüísticos. 35, 1443–1452.

[29] Areán-García, N., 2007. Estudo comparativo de aspectos semânticos do sufixo -ista no português e no galego [A comparative study of semantic aspects of the suffix -ista in Portuguese and Galician] [Master Thesis]. São Paulo, SP: Universidade de São Paulo. Available from: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8142/tde-04102007-144618/ (cited 11 November 2024).

[30] Lacotiz, A., 2007. Valores semânticos dos sufixos -ança/-ença -ância/-ência no português [Diachronic study of the functions and the semantic values of suffixes -ança/-ença, -ância/-ência in the Portuguese] [Master Thesis]. São Paulo, SP: Universidade de São Paulo. Available from: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8142/tde-28012008-112539/ (cited 11 November 2024).

[31] Freitas, É.S.S., 2008. Em busca do mento perdido. Análise semântico-diacrônica do sufixo -mento, no português [In search of the lost 'mento': the diachronic morphological analisis of the suffix MENTO, in Portuguese language] [Master Thesis]. São Paulo, SP: Universidade de São Paulo. Available from: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8142/tde-29092008-151130/ (cited 11 November 2024).

[32] Simões, L., 2009. Estudo semântico e diacrônico do sufixo ‘-dade’ na língua portuguesa [Semantic and diachronic study of the suffix -dade in the Portuguese language] [Master Thesis]. São Paulo, SP: Universidade de São Paulo. Available from: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8142/tde-04022010-161225/ (cited 11 November 2024).

[33] Gonçalves, A.A.G., 2009. Diacronia e produtividade dos sufixos -agem, -igem, -ugem, -ádego, -ádigo e -ádiga no português [Diachrony and productivity of the suffixes -agem, -igem, -ugem, -ádego, -ádigo and -ádiga in Portuguese] [Master Thesis]. São Paulo, SP: Universidade de São Paulo. Available from: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8142/tde-30112009-142459/ (cited 11 November 2024).

Downloads

How to Cite

Maroneze, B., & Lara Ganança, J. H. (2025). Onomasiological and Semasiological Perspectives in Studies on Neology. Linguistic Exploration, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.55121/le.v1i1.188

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (December 2024)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Bruno Maroneze, João Henrique Lara Ganança

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.