E-Participation, Rural Regime, and Network Governance: A Case of Balien River Conservation


  • Liu Shuhuan
  • Peng Cheng




regime theory, network governance, river conservation


The regime theory has been widely applied to analyze the governing capacity for urban community development. However, it has seldom been translated to the countryside, even though rural communities often reveal some potential for self-governance and a capacity to act. With the emergence of information technology, social network services have become popular and have changed the social interactions between the public and private sectors. By considering the rural case of river conservation in New Taipei City, this paper used the regime theory to investigate the governing capacity of rural collaborative networks and the influence of social network services on coordination. We found that the regime theory can be used to explore rural communities with strong collaborative networks and local identities. The adoption of communication tools based on social network services strengthens informal public-private coordination wherein the power geometry of rural regimes is upgraded from ‘power-to’ to ‘power-amidst’, thus, advancing the solidarity of the community networks and prompting the rise of vital coalitions and the governing capacity of rural actors.


[1] Stone, C.N. Regime Politics: Governing At-lanta 1946-1988; University Press of Kansas: Lawrence, KS, USA, 1989.

[2] Beer, A. Leadership and the Governance of Rural Communities. J. Rural Stud. 2014, 34, 254–262.

[3] Horlings, I.; Tops, P.; van Ostaaijen, J.; Cor-nelissen, E. Vital Coalitions—The Urban Re-gime Theory as Theoretical Framework for Analysing Public-Private Partnerships and (Self-)Governance in Rural Regions. In The Organization of Innovation and Transitions; Working Papers No. 2; TransForum: Zoeter-meer, The Netherlands, 2006; pp. 3–44.

[4] Horlings, I.; Tops, P.; van Otaaijen, J. Re-gimes and Vital Coalitions in Rural–Urban Regions in the Netherlands. In Beyond the Rural-Urban Divide: Cross-Continental Per-spectives on the Differentiated Countryside and Its Regulation; Anderson, K., Lehtola, M., Eklund, E., Eds.; Salmi, Emerald Group Pub-lishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2009; pp. 191–220.

[5] Horlings, I. (Ed.) Vital Coalitions, Vital Re-gions: Partnership for Sustainable Regional Development; Wageningen Academic Pub-lishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2010.

[6] Herman, F.; Horlings, I.; Beers, P.J.; Mom-maas, H. The Contested Redefinition of a Sustainable Countryside: Revisiting Frouws’ Rurality Discourses. Sociol. Ruralis 2010, 50, 46–63.

[7] Bertuzzi, N. Urban Regimes and the Right to the City: An Analysis of the No Expo Net-work and its Protest Frames. Rev. Crit. Ciênc. Soc. 2017, 113, 107–128.

[8] Camou, M. Labor-Community Coalitions Through an Urban Regime Lens: Institutions and Ideas inbuilding Power from Be-low. Urban Aff. Rev. 2014, 50, 623–624.

[9] Levend, S.; Erdem, R. Evaluation of Urban Deisions in the Context of Urban Regime Theory: The Case of Konya Courthouse Pro-ject. Int. J. Eng. Invent. 2017, 6, 16–34.

[10] Pierre, J. Can Urban Regimes Travel in Time and Space? Urban Regime Theory, Urban Governance Theory, and Comparative Urban Politics. Urban Aff. Rev. 2014, 50, 864–889.

[11] Ravazzi, S.; Belligni, S. Explaining “Power to” Incubation and Agenda Building in an Urban Regime. Urban Aff. Rev. 2016, 52, 323–347.

[12] Stone, C.N. Reflections on Regime Politics: From Governing Coalition to Urban Political Order. Urban Aff. Rev. 2015, 5, 101–137.

[13] Lyon, L.; Driskell, R. The Community in Ur-ban Society, 2nd ed.; Waveland Press: Long Grove, IL, USA, 2012.

[14] Wates, N. The Community Planning Hand-book; Earthscan Publications: London, UK, 2006.

[15] John, P. Local Governance in Western Europe; Sage: London, UK, 2001.

[16] Ojo, A.; Mellouli, S. Deploying Governance Networks for Societal Challenges. Gov. Inf. Q. 2016.

[17] Gilchrist, A. The Well-connected Community: A Networking Approach to Community De-velopment; Polity Press: London, UK, 2004.

[18] Hunter, F. Community Power Structure: A Study of Decision Makers; University of North Carolina Press: Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 1953.

[19] Dahl, R.A. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 1961.

[20] Bernard, J. The Sociology of Commu-nity; Scott, Foresman and Company: Oakland, CA, USA, 1973.



2023-02-08 — Updated on 2023-02-09


How to Cite

Shuhuan , L., & Cheng , P. (2023). E-Participation, Rural Regime, and Network Governance: A Case of Balien River Conservation. New Countryside, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.55121/nc.v1i2.72 (Original work published February 8, 2023)