Towards a Cultural Sociology of the Uses of Classical Literature: Deploying Literary Representations of Rome and the Romans in England between the 15th and 18th Centuries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55121/cl.v1i1.115Keywords:
Classical, Literature, Roman, Rome, Cultural, Sociology, ReceptionAbstract
Studies of receptions of ancient Greek and Roman literature analyze how so-called ‘classical’ texts are variously taken up and deployed by persons existing at later points in history. So far, the nature of such reception has not been conceptualized in an explicitly sociological manner. This paper proposes one way to do that, drawing upon key ideas developed by the Yale School of Cultural Sociology. This is done in order to re-narrate the ways in which ancient Roman texts were used by various interested parties in England, and later the United Kingdom, between the 15th and 18th centuries. The paper shows how Italian humanist understandings of the classicality of ancient Roman texts were taken up by English humanists, thereby purifying the overall set of such texts, rendering them seemingly context-free and adaptable to changing social circumstances. The relatively autonomous and free-floating nature of Roman literary texts defined as ‘classical’ allowed them to be taken up in different ways at different times for different purposes by different sorts of actors, especially aristocratic ones or those closely associated with aristocratic viewpoints. Texts describing republican Rome, and those depicting the transition from that political condition to the emergence of the Roman empire, were particularly appealing to English exegetes in the 17th and 18th centuries. They were deployed to make sense of the English Civil War and its aftermath, to carve out variant political identities, and to reflect upon the rise of the British Empire, which was understood to have surpassed its Roman counterpart, at the same time as it was feared that it might succumb eventually to a similar demise. The hopes and fears of English elites, as these were woven into the creation of political identities, were worked out through reflection upon and deployment of Roman texts taken to be timeless, processes that the paper models in a distinctive cultural sociological fashion.
References
[1] Addison, J., 1753. Remarks on Several Parts of Italy, &c. in the Years, 1701, 1702, 1703. By the Late Right Honourable Joseph Addison, Esq [Internet]. [cited 2023 Oct 9]. Available from: https://eds-s-ebscohost-com.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/eds/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=72688153-3892-47b4-94f3-1b7a0ed3a907%40redis&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=edsgec.CW0105347842&db=edsgec
[2] Martindale, C., Thomas, R.F., 2006. Classics and the uses of reception. Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken.
[3] Hardwick, L., Stray, C., 2007. A companion to classical receptions. Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken.
[4] Braund, S., 2022. Vergil “disrobed”: John Vicars’ “home-spun English gray-coat plain” Aeneid. Classical Receptions Journal. 14(3), 312-335.
[5] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/crj/clac008
[6] Yarrow, L.M., 2018. The tree and sunset motif: The long shadow of Roman imperialism in representations of Africa. Classical Receptions Journal. 10(3), 275-311.
[7] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/crj/cly004
[8] Hingley, R., 2000. Roman officers and English gentlemen. Routledge: London. pp. 1-244.
[9] Scott, S., 2014. Britain in the classical world: Samuel Lysons and the art of Roman Britain. Classical Receptions Journal. 6(2), 294-337.
[10] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/crj/clt030
[11] Greenwood, E., 2016. Reception studies: The cultural mobility of classics. Daedalus. 145(2), 41-49.
[12] Bourdieu, P., 2000. Pascalian meditations. Polity Press: Cambridge.
[13] Alexander, J.C., 2003. The meanings of social life: A cultural sociology. Oxford University Press: Oxford. pp. 1-26+91-93+85+97+197-199.
[14] Alexander, J.C., Reed, I.A., 2009. Meaning and method: The cultural approach to sociology. Routledge: New York.
[15] Durkheim, E., 2002. The elementary forms of the religious life. George Allen & Unwin Ltd: London.
[16] Alexander, J.C., Smith, P., 2019. The strong programme in cultural sociology: Meaning first. The Routledge handbook of cultural sociology. Routledge: London. pp. 13-22.
[17] Kane, A., 1991. Cultural analysis and historical sociology: The analytic and concrete forms of the autonomy of culture. Sociological Theory. 9(1), 53-69.
[18] DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/201873
[19] Eyerman, R., 2011. The cultural sociology of political assassination: From MLK to RFK to Fortuyn and van Gogh. Palgrave MacMillan: New York. pp. viii+vii.
[20] Alexander, J.C., Breese, E., 2011. Introduction: On social suffering and its cultural construction. Narrating trauma: On the impact of collective suffering. Paradigm: Boulder.
[21] Gao, R., Alexander, J.C., 2011. Remembrance of things past: Cultural trauma, the ‘Nanking Massacre’, and Chinese identity. The Oxford handbook of cultural sociology. Oxford University Press: Oxford. pp. 583-610.
[22] Woods, E.T., 2019. Cultural trauma: Ron Eyerman and the founding of a new research paradigm. American Journal of Cultural Sociology. 7(2), 260-274.
[23] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-019-00071-0
[24] Withington, P., 2010. Society in early modern England: The vernacular origins of some powerful ideas. Polity Press: Cambridge. pp. 1-17.
[25] Hankins, J., 2019. The virtue politics of the Italian humanists. Beyond reception: Renaissance humanism and the transformation of classical antiquity. De Gruyter: Berlin/Boston, MA. pp. 95-114.
[26] Boitani, P., 2007. Petrarch and the ‘barbari Britanni’. Petrarch in Britain: Interpreters, imitators and translators over 700 Years. Oxford University Press: Oxford. pp. 9-25.
[27] Milner, S., 2012. The Italian peninsula: Reception and dissemination. Humanism in fifteenth century Europe. Medium Aevum Monographs/SSMLL: Oxford. pp. 1-30.
[28] Einstein, L., 1902. Italian renaissance in England. The Macmillan Company: London. pp. 1-23+37+58-75+189-197.
[29] Lievsay, J.L., 1964. The Elizabethan image of Italy. Folger Books: Washington,.
[30] Allen, P.S., 1903. Linacre and Latimer in Italy. The English Historical Review. 18(71), 514-517.
[31] Bate, J., 1996. The Elizabethans in Italy. Travel and drama in Shakespeare’s time. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. pp. 1-9+71.
[32] Simonini, R.C., 1952. Italian scholarship in Renaissance England. The Orange Printshop: Chapel Hill. pp. 1-2.
[33] Weiss, R., 1941. Humanism in England during the fifteenth century. Blackwell: Oxford.
[34] Woolfson, J., 2009. Thomas Hoby, William Thomas, and Mid-Tudor travel to Italy. The Oxford handbook of Tudor literature: 1485-1603. Oxford University Press: Oxford. pp. 404-417.
[35] Parks, G.B., 1962. The genesis of Tudor interest in Italian. PMLA. 77(5), 529-535.
[36] DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/460402
[37] Howard, C., 1914. English travellers of the Renaissance. John Lane: London.
[38] Wiener, C.Z., 1971. The beleaguered isle: A study of Elizabethan and Early Jacobean anti-Catholicism. Past and Present. 51(1), 27-62.
[39] Law, C., Nicholas, L.R., 2020. Introduction. Roger Ascham and his sixteenth century world. Brill: Leiden/Boston. pp. 1-19.
[40] Ord, M., 2002. Classical and contemporary Italy in Roger Ascham’s The Scholemaster (1570). Renaissance Studies. 16(2), 202-216.
[41] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-4658.00011
[42] Olsen, T.G., 2017. Ascham’s The Scholemaster, Italianate Englishmen, and the Protestant Circe. Reformation. 12(1), 103-108.
[43] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/refm.v12.103
[44] Ascham, R., 1570. The Scholemaster [Internet]. [cited 2023 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/1844/pg1844.html
[45] Culhane, P., 2004. Philemon Holland’s Livy: Peritexts and contexts. Translation and Literature. 13(2), 268-286.
[46] Rosenberg, E., 1943. Giacomo Castelvetro: Italian publisher in Elizabethan London and his patrons. Huntington Library Quarterly. 6(2), 119-148.
[47] DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3815657
[48] Parkin, S., 2003. Foreign-language printing in London: 1500-1900. The British Library: London.
[49] Clarke, M.L., 1959. Classical education in Britain: 1500-1900. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
[50] Ogilvie, R.M., 1964. Latin and Greek: A history of the influence of the classics on English life from 1600 to 1918. Routledge & Kegan Paul: London. pp. 1-23+38+40.
[51] Marrapodi, M., Cappuzzo, M., Hoenselaars, A.J., et al., 1997. Shakespeare’s Italy: Functions of Italian locations in Renaissance drama. Manchester University Press: Manchester.
[52] Marrapodi, M., 1998. The Italian world of English Renaissance drama: Cultural exchange and intertextuality. Associated University Presses: Cranbury, NJ.
[53] Mingay, G.E., 1976. The rise and fall of a ruling class. Longman: London.
[54] Stone, L., Stone, J.C.F., 1984. An open elite? England 1540-1880. Clarendon Press: Oxford. pp. 105.
[55] Thackray, I.Y., 1984. Zion undermined: The Protestant belief in a popish plot during the English interregnum. History Workshop Journal. 18(1), 28-52.
[56] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/18.1.28
[57] Porter, R., 1991. English society in the 18th century. Penguin Books: London.
[58] Clark, J.C.D., 2000. English society, 1660-1832: Religion, ideology and politics during the ancien régime. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
[59] Hammond, P., 1991. The Kings two bodies: Representations of Charles II. Culture, politics and society in Britain 1600-1800. Manchester University Press: Manchester. pp. 13-48.
[60] Mingay, G.E., 1963. English landed society in the eighteenth century. Routledge and Kegan Paul: London.
[61] Ayres, P.J., 1997. Classical culture and the idea of Rome in the eighteenth century. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. pp. xiii, pp. 1-22.
[62] Colley, L., 2003. Britons: Forging the nation 1707-1837. Pimlico Press: London.
[63] Debs, M., 2013. Using cultural trauma: Gandhi’s assassination, partition and secular nationalism in post-independence India. Nations and Nationalism. 19(4), 635-653.
[64] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12038
[65] Kumar, K., 2012. Greece and Rome in the British empire: Contrasting role models. Journal of British Studies. 51(1), 76-101.
[66] Black, J., 2003. Italy and the grand tour. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT. pp. 4-5+145+160-161+148+174.
[67] Hampson, N., 1990. The enlightenment. Penguin Books Ltd.: London. pp. 45+56+166.
[68] Haydon, C., 1984. Anti-Catholicism in eighteenth-century England: A political and social study. Manchester University Press: Manchester.
[69] Bush, M.L., 1984. The English aristocracy: A comparative synthesis. Manchester University Press: Manchester. pp. 37.
[70] Smith, R.A., 1972. Eighteenth-century English politics: Patrons and place hunters. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.: New York. pp. 122.
[71] Highet, G., 1949. The classical tradition: Greek and Roman influences on western literature. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
[72] Clark, J.C.D., 1986. Revolution and rebellion: State and society in England in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
[73] Cannon, J., 1984. Aristocratic century: The peerage of eighteenth-century England. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. pp. 47+155.
[74] Sachs, J., 2009. Roman antiquity: Classical Rome in the British imagination, 1789-1832. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
[75] Black, J., 2001. Eighteenth-century Britain: 1688-1783. Palgrave: Basingstoke.
[76] Ward, A., 1964. The Tory view of roman history. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900. 4(3), 413-456.
[77] DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/449491
[78] Turner, F.M., 1986. British politics and the demise of the Roman Republic: 1700-1939. The Historical Journal. 29(3), 577-599.
[79] Fox, R.L., 2006. The classical world: An epic history of Greece and Rome. Penguin Books Ltd.: London.
[80] Locke, J., 1869. Two treatises of government. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. pp. 213.
[81] Thorpe, C., 2023. Cultural sociology of cultural representations: Visions of Italy and the Italians in England and Britain from the renaissance to the present day. Routledge: Oxford.
[82] Kelsall, M.M., 1966. The meaning of Addison’s Cato. The Review of English Studies. 17(66), 149-162.
[83] Dickinson, H.T., 1977. Liberty and property: Political ideology in eighteenth-century Britain. Weidenfeld and Nicolson: London. pp. 26.
[84] Ferguson, N., 2003. Empire: How Britain made the modern world. Allen Lane: London.
[85] Black, J., Gregory, J., 1991. Culture, politics and society in Britain 1600-1800. Manchester University Press: Manchester. pp. 1-9.
[86] Calvi, L., 2018. “The name of King will light upon a Tarquin”: Republicanism, exclusion, and the name of King in Nathaniel Lee’s Lucius Junius Brutus. From republic to restoration: legacies and departures. Manchester University Press: Manchester. pp. 309-325.
[87] Porter, R., 2000. Enlightenment: Britain and the creation of the modern world. Allen Lane: London. pp. 426.
[88] Johnson, J.W., 1967. The formation of English neo-classical thought. Princeton University Press: Princeton. pp. 97.
[89] Walpole, H., 1937-1983. Correspondence, Yale edition, 48 vols. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT. pp. 234.
[90] Vance, N., 1999. Decadence and the subversion of empire. Roman presences: Perceptions on Rome in European culture, 1789-1945. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. pp. 110-123.
[91] Zucker, P., 1961. Ruins: An aesthetic hybrid. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 20(2), 119-130.
[92] DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/427461
[93] Leffler, P.K., 1978. From humanist to enlightenment historiography: A case study of François Eudes de Mézeray. French Historical Studies. 10(3), 416-438.
[94] Spadafora, D., 1951. The idea of progress in eighteenth-century Britain. Yale University Press: New Haven.
[95] Pocock, J.G.A., 1985. Virtue, commerce, and history: Essays on political thought and history, chiefly in the eighteenth century. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. pp. 143-144.
[96] Gibbon, E., 1983. The history of the decline and fall of the roman empire. Folio Society: London. pp. viii+301.