Law as Psychic Ontology: Prohibition, Fantasy, and the Affective Life of Authority
Authors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55121/prr.v3i2.1259Abstract
This paper argues that law operates not only as an institutional or political order, but also as a psychic formation embedded within affect, desire, and recognition. The endurance of legal authority cannot be explained solely through coercion, consent, or procedural legitimacy. It also depends on how legality becomes internalized within psychic life and woven into attachments to order, belonging, and social intelligibility. Drawing on psychoanalytic theory, affect studies, socio-legal scholarship, and traditions within psychoanalytic jurisprudence, the paper develops an interdisciplinary account of how legal authority becomes emotionally compelling and socially durable. It examines how subjectivity is shaped through prohibition, fantasy, and ambivalent forms of recognition, and how collective symbols, rituals, and legal imaginaries sustain attachments to legality even under conditions of inequality, exclusion, or disillusionment. The analysis further argues that affect should not be understood as opposed to legal reason, but as part of the background conditions shaping how legal authority is perceived, interpreted, and inhabited. At the same time, affective responsiveness remains subject to normative constraints necessary for consistency, accountability, and procedural fairness. The paper concludes by proposing a psychoanalytic jurisprudence of attunement, one that treats legality as relationally and affectively lived while remaining attentive to the ethical and institutional limits of legal authority. Rather than abandoning legal reasoning, such an approach reconsiders how authority is exercised, experienced, and sustained within social life.
Keywords
Psychoanalytic Jurisprudence, Legal Authority, Recognition, Affect, SubjectivityReferences
[1] Tamanaha, B.Z., 2021. Legal pluralism across the global South: Colonial origins and contemporary consequences. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law. 53(2), 168–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2021.1942606
[2] Spaak, T., Mindus, P. (Eds.), 2021. The Cambridge Companion to Legal Positivism. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
[3] Nikolakakis, N., 2024. Legitimacy, power, and authority: A Weberian perspective. Sociedade e Estado. 39(1), e49343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-20243901e49343
[4] Tyler, T.R., 2023. Whither legitimacy? Legal authority in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 19, 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110722-074236
[5] Tanke, J., 2023. The gentle way in governing: Foucault and the question of neoliberalism. Philosophy and Social Criticism. 49(3), 257–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537221079673
[6] Ewick, P., Silbey, S.S., 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226212708.001.0001
[7] Kozak-Isik, G., 2025. Rethinking legal consciousness under legal pluralism. Social & Legal Studies. 35(3), 371–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639251379869
[8] Nelken, D., 2024. Wikilegality and legal consciousness. Journal of Law and Society. 51(S1), S13–S29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12484
[9] Silbey, S.S., 2005. After legal consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 1, 323–368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115938
[10] Szilágyi, I.H., 2022. Social legal consciousness or legal culture? Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review. 7(2), 5–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53116/pgaflr.2022.2.1
[11] Constable, M., 2014. Our Word Is Our Bond: How Legal Speech Acts Work. Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA, USA.
[12] Perry-Kessaris, A., Barnes, V., 2025. Fantasy legal exhibitions. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly. 76(2), 247–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v76i2.1202
[13] Stolk, S., 2025. Critical Legal Geography, Spatial Cognition, and International Law. In: van Aaken, A., Hirsch, M. (Eds.). International Legal Theory and the Cognitive Turn. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. pp. 240–264.
[14] Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A., 2021. Performing law, performing the city. McGill GLSA Research Series. 1(1), 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26443/glsars.v1i1.165
[15] Goodrich, P., 1995. Oedipus Lex: Psychoanalysis, History, Law. University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520332935
[16] Legendre, P., 1997. Law and the Unconscious: A Psychoanalytic Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK.
[17] Schroeder, J.L., 1998. The Vestal and the Fasces: Hegel, Lacan, Property, and the Feminine. University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA.
[18] Salecl, R., 2002. The Spoils of Freedom: Psychoanalysis and Feminism after the Fall of Socialism. Routledge: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203046104
[19] Fanon, F., 1967. Black Skin, White Masks. Grove Press: New York, NY, USA.
[20] Hartman, S.V., 1997. Scenes of Subjection: Terror, Slavery, and Self-Making in Nineteenth-Century America. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA.
[21] Mbembe, A., 2019. Necropolitics. Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478007227
[22] Freud, S., 1961. The Ego and the Id. Strachey, J. (Ed.). W. W. Norton & Company: New York, NY, USA.
[23] Freud, S., 1961. Civilization and Its Discontents. Moyn, S. (Ed.). Strachey, J. (Trans.). W. W. Norton & Company: New York, NY, USA.
[24] Žižek, S., 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. Verso: London, UK.
[25] Alparone, D., 2023. The violent origin of the law: The link between signifier and jouissance in the criminal act. International Journal of Psychoanalysis and Education. 3(1), 45–59.
[26] Rose, N., 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488856
[27] Klein, M., 1997. Love, Guilt and Reparation and Other Works 1921–1945. Free Press: New York, NY, USA.
[28] Winnicott, D.W., 1965. The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. International Universities Press: New York, NY, USA.
[29] Benjamin, J., 1988. The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem of Domination. Pantheon Books: New York, NY, USA.
[30] Bourdieu, P., 1987. The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field. Hastings Law Journal. 38, 805–853.
[31] Freud, S., 2001. Totem and Taboo, 2nd ed. Routledge: London, UK.
[32] Manderson, D., 2000. Songs without Music: Aesthetic Dimensions of Law and Justice. University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA.
[33] Wang, H., Dai, M., 2024. Moralization of law, heavy-penaltyism, and retributive justice: A corpus-assisted study of legal consciousness on Chinese social media. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice. 79, 100700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2024.100700
[34] Davies, M., 2026. A plural nomos: Law, life, and knowledge. Law and Critique. 37(1), 87–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-024-09392-7
[35] Cornell, D., 2014. Law and Revolution in South Africa: Ubuntu, Dignity, and the Struggle for Constitutional Transformation. Fordham University Press: New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823257577.001.0001
[36] Freud, S., 2010. Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. Strachey, J. (Ed.). W. W. Norton & Company: New York, NY, USA.
[37] Brown, W., 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism's Stealth Revolution. Zone Books: New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt17kk9p8
[38] Lacey, N., 1998. Unspeakable Subjects: Feminist Essays in Legal and Social Theory. Hart Publishing: Oxford, UK.
[39] Hegel, G.W.F., 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit. Miller, A.V. (Trans.). Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
[40] Honneth, A., 1995. The Struggle for Recognition. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
[41] Butler, J., 1997. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford University Press: Redwood City, CA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503616295
[42] Newman, D., Sandberg, R. (Eds.), 2024. Law and Humanities, Vol. 1. Anthem Press: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.9941116.5
[43] Dewi, Y.T.N., Samsura, D.A., Pandiangan, A., et al., 2025. Discriminatory legal pluralism: The fragile authority of Sasi as living law in Maluku. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13582291261441349
[44] Liu, Q., 2024. Legal collusion: Legal consciousness under China's one-child policy. Law and Society Inquiry. 49(4), 2052–2073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2023.79
[45] Onțanu, E.A., Tai, E.T.T., 2025. Digital technology and procedural justice: Towards a geography of justice. Tilburg Law Review. 30(2), 96–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/tilr.422
Downloads
How to Cite
Copyright & License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vered Ben David
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submit Manuscript
