Sartre’s ‘Freedom’ and Society: Existentialist’s Dilemma in Naturalistic View

Authors

  • Anirban Ghosh

    Department of Zoology, School of Sciences, Netaji Subhas Open University, Kolkata 700064, India
  • Malabika Chakrabarti *

    Department of Philosophy, Ananda Mohan College, Kolkata 700009, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55121/prr.v1i1.203

Keywords:

Existentialism, Sartre, Humanism, Freedom, Communism, Consciousness, Survival

Abstract

Existentialism dealt with the essence of human existence and established its priority over others where freedom of act for a conscious mind was the prime factor. Jean-Paul Sartre emphasized on such individual freedom with imposition of some liabilities over it for humanity. Sartre and other philosophers furnished different causes for such restrictions. However, the general concept of natural and evolutionary science is also competent and capable to explain this reservation of freedom. Present article will discuss the background of why such an interruption was required in Sartre’s concept of complete freedom. At the same time the article will analyse whether and how far Sartre’s concept of complete freedom of a conscious mind was relevant from the historical, social and evolutionary biological perspective with an analysis of consciousness from scientific perspective. Examining Sartre’s dilemma on freedom and its relevance with a naturalistic angle, authors tried to answer whether negotiation for freedom was a humanitarian attribute or an obvious natural compulsion for the sustainability of the naturally evolving human association and community. Finally, importance of Sartre in the context of the socio-political scenario of that time has been clarified to justify his views. Simultaneously, the act of a conscious mind in a natural community of human association has been explained to show why it is actually compelling to make a trade-off for freedom in a society.

References

[1] Kierkegaard, S., 1941. Concluding Unscientific Postscript, 1st ed. Princeton University Press: New Jersy, USA. pp. 1–328.

[2] Sartre, J.P., 1956. Existentialism and Humanism. World Publishing Co.: London, UK. pp. 1–124.

[3] Chatterjee, M., 1973. The Existential Outlook. Orient Longman Ltd: Delhi, India. pp. 1–176.

[4] Sartre, J.P., 1956. Being and Nothingness. Philosophical Library: New York, USA. pp. 21–134.

[5] Nietzsche, F., 1996. On the Genealogy of Morals. Oxford World’s Classics: Oxford, UK. pp. 1–208.

[6] Nietzsche, F., 1997. Thus Spake Zarathustra. Wordsworth Classics of World Literature: London, UK. pp. 1–352.

[7] Amanda, O., Missy, S., Matt, M., et al., 2010. Jean-Paul Sartre denounces communism. Available from: https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/november-9/sartre-renounces-communists (cited 12 November 2024)

[8] Sartre, J.P., 1964. The Nobel Prize. Available from: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/1964/press-release/ (cited 12 November 2024)

[9] Sartre, J.P., 1991. Critique of Dialectical Reason Volume 1: Theory of Practical Ensembles. Verso: London, UK. pp. 674–745.

[10] Sartre, J.P., 1991. Critique of Dialectical Reason Volume 2: The Intelligibility of History. Verso: London, UK. pp. 354–428.

[11] Sartre, J.P., 1950. What is Literature. Methuen & Co. Ltd: London, UK. pp. 1–288.

[12] Ponty, M.M., 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge and Kegan Paul: London, UK. pp. 1–696.

[13] Odum, E.P., 1963. Ecology. Holt, Rinehart & Winston: New York, USA. pp. 25–134.

[14] Gould, S.J., Lewontin, R.C., 1979. The Spandrels of San Marco and The Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 205(1161), pp. 581–598.

[15] Blackham, H.J., 1965. Six Existentialist Thinkers. Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd: London, UK. pp. 110–165.

[16] Marx, K., 1986. Thesis of Feuerbach. In: Marx-Engels Selected Works Volume I. Progress Publishers: Moscow, Russia. pp.13–15.

[17] Banks, W.E. et al., 2008. Neanderthal extinction by competitive exclusions. PLoS ONE. 3(12), e3972.

[18] Roberts, P., Stewart, B.A., 2018. Defining the ‘generalist specialist’ niche for Pleistocene Homo sapiens. Nature Human Behavior. 2(8), 542–550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0394-4

[19] Dunbar, R., 1998. Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. pp. 1–242.

[20] Harari, Y.N., 2011. Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. Penguin Random House: London, UK. pp. 22–44.

[21] Pinker, S. 1994. The Language Instinct. William Morrow Inc: New York, USA. pp. 332–369.

[22] Dawkins, R., 1986. The Blind Watchmaker. Penguin Books: London, UK. pp. 22–47.

[23] Dawkins, R., 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press Inc: New York, USA. pp. 166–266.

[24] Wilson, E.O., 2000. Sociobiology–The New Synthesis, 25th Anniversary ed. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, USA. pp.378–382.

[25] Hölldobler, B., Wilson, E.O., 2009. The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance, and Strangeness of Insect Societies, 1st ed. W.W. Norton & Co. Ltd: New York, USA. pp. 4–13.

[26] Hamilton, W.D., 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 7(1), 1–52.

[27] Wilkinson, G.S., 1988. Reciprocal altruism in bats and other mammals. Ethology and Sociobiology. 9(2–4), 85–100.

[28] LeDoux, J., 2019. The Deep History of Ourselves: The Four-Billion-Year Story of How We Got Conscious Brains. Penguin Books: New York, USA. pp. 326–334.

[29] Dennett, D., 1991. Consciousness Explained. Little Brown and Co.: London, UK. pp. 428–510.

[30] Koch, C., 2004. The Quest for Consciousness: A Neurobiological Approach, 1st ed. Roberts & Co: Englewood, USA. pp. 391–403.

[31] Kotchoubey, B., 2018. Human Consciousness: Where Is It From and What Is It for. Frontiers in Psychology. 9, 567. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00567

[32] Nani, A., Manuello, J., Mancuso, L., et al., 2019. The Neural Correlates of Consciousness and Attention: Two Sister Processes of the Brain. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 13, 1169. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01169

[33] Wittgenstein, L., 1996. Philosophische Grammatik. Springer: Wien, Austria. pp. 1–195.

[34] Brüne, M., Brüne-Cohrs, U., 2006. Theory of mind-evolution, ontogeny, brain mechanisms and psychopathology. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 30(4), 437–455.

[35] Sartre, J.P., 2003. Being and Nothingness. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 649–656.

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (December 2024)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Anirban Ghosh, Malabika Chakrabarti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.