Thought-Shaping, Reflection and the Refractive Element

Authors

  • Otto Paans *

    Independent Philosopher, 6369 Simpelveld, The Netherlands

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55121/prr.v1i1.278

Keywords:

Thought-Shaping, Reflection, Post-Kantian Philosophy, Relativism, Cognition, Philosophical Hermeneutics, Refraction

Abstract

Is it possible to think beyond the structuring and directing influences of thought-shaping? Or, phrased differently, how can thought-shaping be genuinely free and creative? My response in this essay is that we must move beyond the idea of thought-shaping as mere awareness or critical reflection. As I show, the notion of reflection itself has raised some philosophical issues of its own. Notably issues surrounding the limits of reason, the effective presence of biases, and overreliance on the notion of historical experience as they were transmitted from Kant to Hegel are critically discussed, with the aim of identifying a new direction to think about reflection. The development of reflection is examined via the thought of Gadamer, mainly through his hermeneutic conception of experience. After discussing these issues, I develop the notion of refraction, expanding on the concept as it was developed by Bergson. I explain how refraction relies on the appreciation of difference, thereby reorienting the entire field of thinking and overcoming the limitations inherent in the notion of reflection. This differentiating feature turns refraction into a creative and generative process. Concluding, I discuss how refraction supports free thinking by appealing to the notion of creative piety and the embrace as well as usage of limitations in thinking.

References

[1] Kant, I., 1775–1776. Anthropology friedländer. In: Kant, I. (ed.). Akademie Ausgabe, 25th ed. Akademie Ausgabe: Berlin, Germany. pp. 469–728. (in German).

[2] Kant, I., 1790. Critique of the power of judgment. In: Kant, I. (ed.). Akademie Ausgabe, 5th ed. Akademie Ausgabe: Berlin, Germany. pp. 165–485. (in German).

[3] Kant, I., 1781/1787. Critique of pure reason, A/B edition. In: Kant, I. (ed.). Akademie Ausgabe, 4th ed. Akademie Ausgabe: Berlin, Germany. pp. 1–251. (in German).

[4] Adorno, T., 1993. Hegel: Three Studies. Transl. Weber Nicholsen, S. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[5] Aurelius, M., 2006. Meditations. Transl. Hammond, M. Penguin: New York, NY, USA.

[6] Bachelard, G., 2002. The Formation of the Scientific Mind. Transl. Jones, M.M. Clinamen Press: Manchester, NH, USA.

[7] Bergson, H., 1950. Time and Free Will. An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness. George Allen and Unwin: London, UK.

[8] Burke, E., 2015. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Sublime and the Beautiful. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[9] Gadamer, H.-G., 1976. Hegel’s Dialectic. Five Hermeneutic Studies. Transl. Christopher Smith, P. Yale University Press: London, UK & New Haven, CT, USA.

[10] Gadamer, H.-G., 2013. Truth and Method. Transl. Weinsheimer, J., Marshall, D.G. Bloomsbury Publishing: London, UK.

[11] Hanna, R., Paans, O., 2021. Thought-shapers. Cosmos and History. 17(1), 1–72.

[12] Hanna, R., Paans, O., 2022. Creative Piety and Neo-Utopianism: Cultivating Our Global Garden. Cosmos and History. 18(1), 1–82.

[13] Hegel, G.W.F., 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit. Transl. Miller, A.V. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[14] Heidegger, M., 2015. Hegel. Transl. Arel, J., Feuerhahn, N. Indiana University Press: Bloomington/Indianapolis, IN, USA.

[15] Kant, I., 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Transl. Guyer, P., Matthews, E.. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[16] Kant, I,. 2012. Lectures on Anthropology. Transl. Wood, A., Louden, R. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[17] Kant, I., 2015. Critique of Pure Reason. Transl. Guyer, P. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[18] Kondor, Z. 2022. Thought-Shapers Embedded. Frontiers in Psychology. 13, 918820.

[19] Lingis, A., 2018. The Alphonso Lingis Reader. University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, MN, USA.

[20] Mullarkey, J., 2004. Forget the virtual: Bergson, actualism and the refraction of reality. Continental Philosophy Review. 37, 469–493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-005-7097-z

[21] Nelson, H., Stoltermann, E., 2014. The Design Way. Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[22] Nowotny, H., 1996. Time: The Modern and Postmodern Experience. Transl. Plaice. N., Polity Press: Cambridge, UK.

[23] Paans, O., 2020. Postmodernity and the politics of fragmentation. Borderless Philosophy. 3, 264–310.

[24] Paans. O., 2023. Kant’s cognitive gradualism: Reflection and experience. Contemporary Studies in Kantian Philosophy. 8, 102–121.

[25] Paans. O., 2024. Nebula rasa: The diaphanous as generative stimulus in architectural design. Arts and Communication. 2(1), 1922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36922/ac.1922

[26] Pippin, R., 2002. Gadamer’s Hegel. In: Dostal, R.J. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 225–246.

[27] Rheinberger, H.-J., 2005. Iterationen. Merve Verlag: Berlin, Germany.

[28] Schön, D., 1987. The Reflective Practitioner. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[29] Schön, D., 1992. Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Knowledge-Based Systems. 5(1), 3–14.

[30] Sennett, R., 2008. The Craftsman. Penguin Books: New York, NY, USA.

[31] Wittgenstein, L., 2015. Philosophical Investigations. Transl. Anscombe, G.E.M., Hacker, P.M.S.,Schulte, J. Wiley-Blackwell: London, UK.

[32] Zalta, E.N., Nodelman, U., 2025. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/ (cited 7 December 2024).

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (December 2024)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Otto Paans

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.