The The Paradoxes of the Modern Geistes: Critico-Comparative Introspect of the Previous Century

Authors

  • Alvin Servaña *

    School of Multidisciplinary Studies, De la Salle – College of Saint Benilde, Manila 1004, Philippines

    General Education, Polytechnic University of the Philippines – San Juan, San Juan City 1503, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55121/prr.v3i1.771

Keywords:

History of Knowledge, Critique of the Modern World, Critical Discourse Analysis, Christian-Hegelian Criticism, Philosophy of History

Abstract

This essay investigates the existential and philosophical dilemmas of modernity, drawing on the prophetic insights of Friedrich Nietzsche and José Rizal as critical entry points. Though situated on opposite ends of the globe, both thinkers discerned a paradox at the heart of modernity: its promise of liberation entwined with new forms of domination. Nietzsche’s pronouncement of the “death of God” diagnosed the spiritual vacuum of Western civilisation, while Rizal’s critique of colonial modernity exposed the violence embedded in imperial progress. Together, they illuminate the dialectics between emancipation and barbarism that have shaped the past century. Complementary reflections by Paul Johnson, Viktor Frankl, and Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn highlight modernity’s contradictions, particularly the instrumental rationality that enabled both human flourishing and systematic destruction. Cultural transformations, marked by the fragmentation of coherent narratives, are further exemplified in the literary visions of W. Somerset Maugham and Gabriel García Márquez, whose works capture the dissonance of fractured modern identities. The inquiry culminates in an exploration of hypermodernity’s crisis of selfhood, where digital “excarnation” threatens embodied human experience. Against this backdrop, the essay advocates for situated transcendence and moral imagination as pathways to reclaim sensibility amid disintegration. By echoing the voices of past thinkers, it calls for a conscious inhabiting of modernity’s tensions—an effort to confront paradoxes with compassion and creativity. Ultimately, the essay envisions more grounded in ethical vigilance and imaginative renewal, as antidotes to the alienation of the contemporary age. Echoing the voices of past thinkers, it calls for a nuanced engagement with the unresolved paradoxes of the modern Geistes—an effort to inhabit its tensions consciously and compassionately while envisioning more humanistic futures.

References

[1] Larrauri-Pertierra, I.X., 2020. On Gadamerian Hermeneutics: Fusions of Horizons, Dialogue, and Evolution(s) within Culture as Dynamic System of Meaning. Eidos: A Journal for Philosophy of Culture. 4(4), 45–62.

[2] Krahn, R.D.T., 2009. Gadamer's Fusion of Horizons and Intercultural Interpretation [Master’s Thesis]. University of Guelph: Guelph, ON, Canada.

[3] Edling, S., Löfström, J., Sharp, H., et al., 2022. Mapping Moral Consciousness in Research on Historical Consciousness and Education – A Summative Content Analysis of 512 Research Articles Published between 1980 and 2020. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 54(2), 282–300.

[4] Quijano, A., 2024. Foundational Essays on the Coloniality of Power. Mignolo, W., Segato, R.L. (Eds.). Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA.

[5] Quintero, P., 2024. An Introduction on Power and Coloniality of Power in Aníbal Quijano's Work. In: Rubbo, D.A. (Ed.). Aníbal Quijano: Dissidences and Crossroads of Latin American Critical Theory. Routledge: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032617749-12

[6] Mignolo, W.D., 2017. Coloniality Is Far from Over, and So Must Be Decoloniality. Afterall. 43. Available from: https://www.afterall.org/articles/coloniality-is-far-from-over-and-so-must-be-decoloniality/

[7] Chakrabarty, D., 2008. Provincialising Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA.

[8] Bhambra, G.K., 2014. Postcolonial and Decolonial Dialogues. Postcolonial Studies. 17(2), 115–121.

[9] Roberts, B., 2019. Media Archaeology and Critical Theory of Technology. In: Goodall, M., Roberts, B. (Eds.). New Media Archaeologies. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 155–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048532094.008

[10] Stiegler, B., 2011. Technics and Time. Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA, USA.

[11] Caruso, M., Spadaro, A., 2024. Digital Humanities and Artificial Intelligence: An Accelerationist Perspective of the Future. Proceedings. 96(1), 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024096010

[12] Frontoni, E., Paolanti, M., Migliorelli, L., et al., 2024. Editorial: Artificial Intelligence: The New Frontier in Digital Humanities. Frontiers in Computer Science. 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2024.1529826

[13] Clavert, F., Regan, A., Takats, S., 2024. AI & History. Journal of Digital History. Available from: https://journalofdigitalhistory.org/en/cfp/ai (cited 17 August 2025).

[14] Kissinger, H.A., Schmidt, E., Huttenlocher, D. 2021. The Age of AI: And Our Human Future. Little, Brown, and Company: London, UK.

[15] Hui, Y., 2017. For a Philosophy of Technology in China. Parrhesia. 27, 48–63.

[16] Taylor, C., 2007. A Secular Age. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[17] Hunter, I., 2011. Charles Taylor's A Secular Age and Secularisation in Early Modern Germany. Modern Intellectual History. 8(3), 621–646.

[18] Milbank, J., 2017. Radical Orthodoxy and Protestantism Today. Acta Theologica. S25, 43–72.

[19] Pickstock, C., 1998. After Writing: On the Liturgical Consummation of Philosophy. Blackwell: Oxford, UK.

[20] Grant, E.A., 2019. An Eschatological Critique of Catherine Pickstock's Liturgical Theology. New Blackfriars. 100, 493–508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nbfr.12400

[21] Grimley, M., 2013. The Fall and Rise of Church and State? Religious History, Politics and the State in Britain, 1961–2011. Studies in Church History. 49, 491–512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0424208400002308

[22] Hegel, G.W.F., 2010. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: The Science of Logic. Giovanni, G.D. (Ed.). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 385–394.

[23] Adorno, T.W., 1973. Negative Dialectics. Continuum: New York, NY, USA. pp. 141–161.

[24] Nietzsche, F., 1974. The Gay Science. Kaufmann, W. (Trans.). Vintage Books: New York, NY, USA. p. 181.

[25] Rose, G., 1992. The Broken Middle: Out of Our Ancient Society. Blackwell: Oxford, UK. pp. 17–35.

[26] Rizal, J., 1972. The Philippines a Century Hence. In Political and Historical Writings. Alzona, E. (Trans.). National Historical Institute: Manila, Philippines. p. 143.

[27] Arendt, H., 1963. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. Viking Press: New York, NY, USA.

[28] Frankl, V.E., 2006. Man's Search for Meaning. Beacon Press: Boston, MA, USA. p. 66.

[29] Solzhenitsyn, A., 1974. The Gulag Archipelago, 1918–1956: An Experiment in Literary Investigation, I. Whitney, T.P., Willettes, H.T. (Trans.). Harper & Row: New York, NY, USA. pp. 173–185.

[30] Solzhenitsyn, A., 2006. Live Not By Lies. In: Ericson Jr., E.E., Mahoney, D.J. (Eds.). The Solzhenitsyn Reader: New and Essential Writings, 1947–2005. ISI Books: Wilmington, DE, USA. pp. 556–558.

[31] Maugham, W.S., 2007. Of Human Bondage. Penguin Classics: New York, NY, USA. p. 656.

[32] García Márquez, G., 1970. One Hundred Years of Solitude. Harper & Row: New York, NY, USA.

[33] García Márquez, G., 1982. The Solitude of Latin America. Nobel Prize lecture. Available from: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/1982/marquez/lecture/ (cited 17 August 2025).

[34] Turkle, S., 2011. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books: New York, NY, USA. pp. 15–31.

[35] Stone, L., 2006. Continuous Partial Attention—Not the Same as Multi-Tasking. Business Week. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20090127061147/http://www.businessweek.com/business_at_work/time_management/archives/2008/07/continuous_part.html (cited 17 August 2025).

[36] Aristotle, 1985. Nicomachean Ethics. Irwin, T. (Trans.). Hackett Publishing: Indianapolis, IN, USA.

[37] Johnson, P., 1983. Modern Times: The World from the Twenties to the Nineties. Harper & Row: New York, NY, USA.

[38] Eagleton, T., 2014. Culture and the Death of God. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA.

[39] Hegel, G.W.F., 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. p. 19.

[40] Servaña, A. 2024. Report on Culture Towards Critical Rapport: Basis for Cautious, Conscious and Careful Contemporary Cultural Studies and Literacy. International Journal of Sociology and Social policy. 45(1–2), 106–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-04-2024-0156

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (March 2026): In Progress

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Alvin Servaña

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.